A Theoretical Framework for Law and Macro-Finance

IF 2 Q1 LAW Journal of Financial Regulation Pub Date : 2022-09-09 DOI:10.1093/jfr/fjac011
M Konrad Borowicz
{"title":"A Theoretical Framework for Law and Macro-Finance","authors":"M Konrad Borowicz","doi":"10.1093/jfr/fjac011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article considers the effects of legal protections of creditors within the macro-financial theory of leverage cycles developed by John Geanakoplos. The theory posits that leverage is procyclical. I propose a theoretical framework, ‘Law and Macro-Finance’, comprising two main clams: (1) the strength of legal protections of creditors has an impact on the quantum of debt creditors are willing to underwrite not just the interest rate on that debt and (2) that quantum varies across the cycle in a procyclical fashion. In a boom, when asset prices are higher, leverage decreases, creating incentives for creditors to underwrite additional leverage secured on those assets without increasing the interest rate. The stronger the legal protections of creditors, the stronger the incentives to underwrite additional leverage based solely on the increasing value of the collateral. By creating such incentives, strong legal protections of creditors, associated with claims designated in the law as ‘bankruptcy remote’, will accelerate the boom and increase the vulnerability of the economy to shocks. On the normative side, this article proposes a countercyclical design of strong legal protections of creditors. The design makes the availability of such protections, typically achieved by reliance on the legal doctrine of ‘true sales’, conditioned on the adequacy of the price paid in the transaction. The adequacy, in turn, is determined in reference to the applicable schedule of collateral haircuts determined by the central bank.","PeriodicalId":42830,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Financial Regulation","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Financial Regulation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jfr/fjac011","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article considers the effects of legal protections of creditors within the macro-financial theory of leverage cycles developed by John Geanakoplos. The theory posits that leverage is procyclical. I propose a theoretical framework, ‘Law and Macro-Finance’, comprising two main clams: (1) the strength of legal protections of creditors has an impact on the quantum of debt creditors are willing to underwrite not just the interest rate on that debt and (2) that quantum varies across the cycle in a procyclical fashion. In a boom, when asset prices are higher, leverage decreases, creating incentives for creditors to underwrite additional leverage secured on those assets without increasing the interest rate. The stronger the legal protections of creditors, the stronger the incentives to underwrite additional leverage based solely on the increasing value of the collateral. By creating such incentives, strong legal protections of creditors, associated with claims designated in the law as ‘bankruptcy remote’, will accelerate the boom and increase the vulnerability of the economy to shocks. On the normative side, this article proposes a countercyclical design of strong legal protections of creditors. The design makes the availability of such protections, typically achieved by reliance on the legal doctrine of ‘true sales’, conditioned on the adequacy of the price paid in the transaction. The adequacy, in turn, is determined in reference to the applicable schedule of collateral haircuts determined by the central bank.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
法律与宏观金融的理论框架
本文从吉纳科普洛斯的杠杆周期宏观金融理论出发,考察了法律保护对债权人的影响。该理论假定杠杆是顺周期的。我提出了一个理论框架,“法律和宏观金融”,包括两个主要主张:(1)债权人的法律保护力度对债权人愿意承保的债务数量有影响,而不仅仅是债务的利率;(2)这个数量在整个周期中以顺周期的方式变化。在经济繁荣时期,当资产价格较高时,杠杆率会下降,从而激励债权人在不提高利率的情况下,为这些资产提供额外的杠杆担保。对债权人的法律保护越强,仅仅基于抵押品价值的增加而承保额外杠杆的动机就越强。通过建立这样的激励机制,对债权人的强有力的法律保护,以及法律规定的“破产风险”索赔,将加速繁荣,并增加经济对冲击的脆弱性。在规范方面,本文提出了对债权人强有力的法律保护的逆周期设计。这种设计使得这种保护的可用性,通常通过依赖于“真实销售”的法律原则来实现,条件是交易中支付的价格是否足够。而充分性则是参照中央银行确定的适用的抵押品减值时间表来确定的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
3.80%
发文量
12
期刊最新文献
Generative Artificial Intelligence and Cyber Security in Central Banking Enhancing Repo Market Transparency: The EU Securities Financing Transactions Regulation Correction to: Could it Happen in the EU? An Analysis of Loss Distributionbetween Shareholders and AT1 Bondholders under EU Law Ten Years of the Single Supervisory Mechanism: Looking into the Past, Navigating into the Future “Tis new to thee’: response to Gruenewald, Knijp, Schoenmaker, and van Tilburg
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1