A comparative analysis of the FIUs and FATF compliance of Canada, Australia, The Netherlands and India

IF 1.3 Q3 CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY Journal of Money Laundering Control Pub Date : 2023-11-17 DOI:10.1108/jmlc-09-2023-0155
Durgesh Pandey
{"title":"A comparative analysis of the FIUs and FATF compliance of Canada, Australia, The Netherlands and India","authors":"Durgesh Pandey","doi":"10.1108/jmlc-09-2023-0155","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3>Purpose</h3>\n<p>This paper aims to analyse the Financial Intelligence Units (FIUs) of Canada, Australia, The Netherlands and India, focussing on key internal and external processes, such as the exchange of information, operations and compliance with Financial Action Task Force (FATF) recommendations. The paper relies on secondary sources to compare and assess the practices and strategies employed by FIUs within these jurisdictions.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Design/methodology/approach</h3>\n<p>The paper relies on secondary sources to compare and assess the practices and strategies used by FIUs within these jurisdictions.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Findings</h3>\n<p>The ability to combat money laundering and the financing of terrorism (AML/CFT) in countries is influenced by several internal and external factors, including the efficiency of their FIUs’ and compliance with FATF recommendations. The analysis of FIUs across the countries demonstrates a raft of multifaceted challenges and concerns. Yet, when it comes to compliance with FATF’s recommendations, shared concerns emerge, hinting at the complex interplay between country-specific operations and global compliance standards. The paper recommends enhancements to the FIUs’ operational efficiency and overall effectiveness in combating financial crimes.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Research limitations/implications</h3>\n<p>The paper’s findings are limited to openly available data (such as annual reports and internet sources) for the respective countries. The paper relies on the transparency of FIUs through public media, focusing on comparing and analysing the FIUs of only four specific countries, which limits the generalisations of the findings.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Practical implications</h3>\n<p>This paper is significant for policymakers and FIU authorities, as they strive to improve the effectiveness of their units and assess their performance in alignment with international standards. The comparative analysis of the FIUs of India, Australia, Canada and The Netherlands provides valuable insights and recommendations that can inform policymakers and operational strategies towards enhancing how FIUs function globally.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Originality/value</h3>\n<p>This paper offers a unique comparative analysis of the FIUs of India, Australia, Canada and The Netherlands. Its findings have practical implications for policymakers and FIU authorities towards enhancing performance against international AML/CFT standards and promoting global cooperation.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->","PeriodicalId":46042,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Money Laundering Control","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Money Laundering Control","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/jmlc-09-2023-0155","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

This paper aims to analyse the Financial Intelligence Units (FIUs) of Canada, Australia, The Netherlands and India, focussing on key internal and external processes, such as the exchange of information, operations and compliance with Financial Action Task Force (FATF) recommendations. The paper relies on secondary sources to compare and assess the practices and strategies employed by FIUs within these jurisdictions.

Design/methodology/approach

The paper relies on secondary sources to compare and assess the practices and strategies used by FIUs within these jurisdictions.

Findings

The ability to combat money laundering and the financing of terrorism (AML/CFT) in countries is influenced by several internal and external factors, including the efficiency of their FIUs’ and compliance with FATF recommendations. The analysis of FIUs across the countries demonstrates a raft of multifaceted challenges and concerns. Yet, when it comes to compliance with FATF’s recommendations, shared concerns emerge, hinting at the complex interplay between country-specific operations and global compliance standards. The paper recommends enhancements to the FIUs’ operational efficiency and overall effectiveness in combating financial crimes.

Research limitations/implications

The paper’s findings are limited to openly available data (such as annual reports and internet sources) for the respective countries. The paper relies on the transparency of FIUs through public media, focusing on comparing and analysing the FIUs of only four specific countries, which limits the generalisations of the findings.

Practical implications

This paper is significant for policymakers and FIU authorities, as they strive to improve the effectiveness of their units and assess their performance in alignment with international standards. The comparative analysis of the FIUs of India, Australia, Canada and The Netherlands provides valuable insights and recommendations that can inform policymakers and operational strategies towards enhancing how FIUs function globally.

Originality/value

This paper offers a unique comparative analysis of the FIUs of India, Australia, Canada and The Netherlands. Its findings have practical implications for policymakers and FIU authorities towards enhancing performance against international AML/CFT standards and promoting global cooperation.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
加拿大、澳大利亚、荷兰和印度FIUs和FATF合规性比较分析
本文旨在分析加拿大、澳大利亚、荷兰和印度的金融情报单位(fiu),重点关注关键的内部和外部流程,如信息交换、运营和遵守金融行动特别工作组(FATF)的建议。本文依靠二手资料来比较和评估这些司法管辖区的外国投资委员会所采用的做法和策略。设计/方法/方法本文依靠二手资料来比较和评估这些司法管辖区内外国投资机构使用的做法和策略。各国打击洗钱和恐怖主义融资(AML/CFT)的能力受到若干内部和外部因素的影响,包括其外国投资委员会的效率和对金融行动特别工作组建议的遵守情况。对各国外国投资委员会的分析显示了一系列多方面的挑战和担忧。然而,当涉及到遵守FATF的建议时,共同的担忧出现了,这暗示了国家特定业务与全球合规标准之间复杂的相互作用。报告建议提高外国投资委员会在打击金融犯罪方面的运作效率和整体效力。研究局限性/意义本文的研究结果仅限于各自国家的公开数据(如年度报告和互联网资源)。这篇论文依赖于公共媒体对外国投资委员会的透明度,只对四个特定国家的外国投资委员会进行了比较和分析,这限制了研究结果的概括。本文对政策制定者和金融情报机构当局具有重要意义,因为他们正在努力提高其单位的有效性,并根据国际标准评估其绩效。对印度、澳大利亚、加拿大和荷兰的外国投资委员会的比较分析提供了宝贵的见解和建议,可以为政策制定者和运营战略提供信息,以加强外国投资委员会在全球的运作。原创性/价值本文对印度、澳大利亚、加拿大和荷兰的fiu进行了独特的比较分析。其研究结果对政策制定者和金融情报机构提高反洗钱/反恐融资国际标准的绩效和促进全球合作具有实际意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Money Laundering Control
Journal of Money Laundering Control CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY-
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
27.30%
发文量
59
期刊最新文献
Facets of drug trafficking in Manipur, a border state of India: volumes, ethnicity and value Evolution of the whistleblowing regime: the UAE model Improving client risk classification with machine learning to increase anti-money laundering detection efficiency Deciphering the links: evaluating central bank transparency impact on corruption perception index in G20 countries Banks’ internal governance obligations vis-à-vis money laundering risks emerging from the new technology-enabled means to transfer funds or value (“crypto assets”)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1