Yu Zhang, Martijn Tennekes, Tim de Jong, Lyana Curier, Bob Coecke, Min Chen
{"title":"Simulation-Based Optimization of User Interfaces for Quality-Assuring Machine Learning Model Predictions","authors":"Yu Zhang, Martijn Tennekes, Tim de Jong, Lyana Curier, Bob Coecke, Min Chen","doi":"https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3594552","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Quality-sensitive applications of machine learning (ML) require quality assurance (QA) by humans before the predictions of an ML model can be deployed. QA for ML (QA4ML) interfaces require users to view a large amount of data and perform many interactions to correct errors made by the ML model. An optimized user interface (UI) can significantly reduce interaction costs. While UI optimization can be informed by user studies evaluating design options, this approach is not scalable because there are typically numerous small variations that can affect the efficiency of a QA4ML interface. Hence, we propose using simulation to evaluate and aid the optimization of QA4ML interfaces. In particular, we focus on simulating the combined effects of human intelligence in initiating appropriate interaction commands and machine intelligence in providing algorithmic assistance for accelerating QA4ML processes. As QA4ML is usually labor-intensive, we use the simulated task completion time as the metric for UI optimization under different interface and algorithm setups. We demonstrate the usage of this UI design method in several QA4ML applications.</p>","PeriodicalId":3,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Electronic Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Electronic Materials","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3594552","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Quality-sensitive applications of machine learning (ML) require quality assurance (QA) by humans before the predictions of an ML model can be deployed. QA for ML (QA4ML) interfaces require users to view a large amount of data and perform many interactions to correct errors made by the ML model. An optimized user interface (UI) can significantly reduce interaction costs. While UI optimization can be informed by user studies evaluating design options, this approach is not scalable because there are typically numerous small variations that can affect the efficiency of a QA4ML interface. Hence, we propose using simulation to evaluate and aid the optimization of QA4ML interfaces. In particular, we focus on simulating the combined effects of human intelligence in initiating appropriate interaction commands and machine intelligence in providing algorithmic assistance for accelerating QA4ML processes. As QA4ML is usually labor-intensive, we use the simulated task completion time as the metric for UI optimization under different interface and algorithm setups. We demonstrate the usage of this UI design method in several QA4ML applications.
机器学习(ML)的质量敏感应用需要在部署ML模型的预测之前由人类进行质量保证(QA)。QA for ML (QA4ML)接口要求用户查看大量数据并执行许多交互以纠正ML模型所犯的错误。优化的用户界面(UI)可以显著降低交互成本。虽然UI优化可以通过用户研究来评估设计选项,但这种方法是不可伸缩的,因为通常有许多小的变化会影响QA4ML界面的效率。因此,我们建议使用仿真来评估和帮助QA4ML接口的优化。特别是,我们专注于模拟人类智能在启动适当的交互命令和机器智能在为加速QA4ML过程提供算法辅助方面的综合效果。由于QA4ML通常是劳动密集型的,因此我们使用模拟任务完成时间作为不同接口和算法设置下UI优化的度量。我们将演示在几个QA4ML应用程序中使用这种UI设计方法。