首页 > 最新文献

Vaccine最新文献

英文 中文
The risk of pregnancy-related adverse outcomes after COVID-19 vaccination: Propensity score-matched analysis with influenza vaccination 接种 COVID-19 疫苗后妊娠相关不良后果的风险:与流感疫苗接种的倾向得分匹配分析
IF 4.5 3区 医学 Q2 IMMUNOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-11-25 DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2024.126506
Yu Jung Choi , Jaehun Jung , Minsun Kang , Min Joo Choi , Won Suk Choi , Yu Bin Seo , Hak-Jun Hyun , Yoonsun Yoon , Young June Choe , Geum Joon Cho , Young-Eun Kim , Dong Wook Kim , Hye Seong , Eliel Nham , Jin Gu Yoon , Ji Yun Noh , Joon Young Song , Woo Joo Kim , Hee Jin Cheong

Introduction

Coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19) vaccination rates in pregnant women remain low owing to safety concerns. When evaluating vaccine safety, comparisons with unvaccinated individuals may lead to healthy vaccinee bias. This study aimed to investigate the association between mRNA-based COVID-19 vaccination and pregnancy-related adverse outcomes compared with influenza vaccination.

Methods

A propensity score-matched cohort study was conducted using the National Health Insurance Service insurance claims database, combined with COVID-19 and influenza vaccination registration data from the Korea Disease Control and Prevention Agency. Based on the age, comorbidities, insurance type, region, hospital type, gestational age at vaccination, and primiparity, the COVID-19 vaccination-only group and influenza vaccination-only group were matched in a 1:3 ratio, while both (COVID-19 and influenza) vaccination group and influenza vaccination-only group were also matched in a 1:3 ratio. Logistic regression analysis was used to calculate odds ratios (ORs) with 95 % confidence intervals (CIs) between the two groups.

Results

From October 18, 2021, to March 3, 2022, 71,902 pregnant women were identified, and the vaccination records of 67,522 individuals were verified. Among them, 610 received the COVID-19 vaccination only, 49,952 received the influenza vaccination only, and 2405 received both vaccines. In the COVID-19 vaccination-only group, the risk of large for gestational age was higher than in the influenza vaccination-only group (OR = 2.285, 95 % CI = 1.155–4.522, P = 0.018). In the group that received both vaccinations, the risk of premature birth was higher (OR = 1.365, 95 % CI = 1.124–1.656, P = 0.002) than that in the influenza vaccination-only group but lower than the domestic baseline incidence rates. No significant differences were observed in other maternal and neonatal outcomes.

Conclusion

mRNA-based COVID-19 vaccination in pregnant women is safe without a remarkable increase in adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes. Given the high morbidity and mortality rates of COVID-19 in pregnant women, it is reasonable to recommend COVID-19 vaccination for pregnant women.
导言科罗纳病毒 2019(COVID-19)疫苗在孕妇中的接种率仍然很低,这是出于安全考虑。在评估疫苗安全性时,与未接种者进行比较可能会导致健康接种者偏差。本研究旨在调查与流感疫苗接种相比,基于 mRNA 的 COVID-19 疫苗接种与妊娠相关不良结局之间的关联。方法利用国民健康保险服务保险理赔数据库,结合韩国疾病预防控制机构提供的 COVID-19 和流感疫苗接种登记数据,进行倾向得分匹配队列研究。根据年龄、合并症、保险类型、地区、医院类型、接种时的胎龄和初产妇情况,只接种 COVID-19 疫苗组和只接种流感疫苗组按 1:3 的比例进行匹配,同时接种(COVID-19 和流感)疫苗组和只接种流感疫苗组也按 1:3 的比例进行匹配。结果从 2021 年 10 月 18 日到 2022 年 3 月 3 日,共识别出 71902 名孕妇,并核实了 67522 人的疫苗接种记录。其中,610 人只接种了 COVID-19 疫苗,49952 人只接种了流感疫苗,2405 人接种了两种疫苗。仅接种 COVID-19 疫苗组的胎龄过大风险高于仅接种流感疫苗组(OR = 2.285,95 % CI = 1.155-4.522,P = 0.018)。在同时接种两种疫苗的组别中,早产风险高于只接种流感疫苗组别(OR = 1.365,95 % CI = 1.124-1.656,P = 0.002),但低于国内基线发病率。结论孕妇接种基于 mRNA 的 COVID-19 疫苗是安全的,不会明显增加孕产妇和新生儿的不良后果。鉴于 COVID-19 在孕妇中的高发病率和高死亡率,建议孕妇接种 COVID-19 疫苗是合理的。
{"title":"The risk of pregnancy-related adverse outcomes after COVID-19 vaccination: Propensity score-matched analysis with influenza vaccination","authors":"Yu Jung Choi ,&nbsp;Jaehun Jung ,&nbsp;Minsun Kang ,&nbsp;Min Joo Choi ,&nbsp;Won Suk Choi ,&nbsp;Yu Bin Seo ,&nbsp;Hak-Jun Hyun ,&nbsp;Yoonsun Yoon ,&nbsp;Young June Choe ,&nbsp;Geum Joon Cho ,&nbsp;Young-Eun Kim ,&nbsp;Dong Wook Kim ,&nbsp;Hye Seong ,&nbsp;Eliel Nham ,&nbsp;Jin Gu Yoon ,&nbsp;Ji Yun Noh ,&nbsp;Joon Young Song ,&nbsp;Woo Joo Kim ,&nbsp;Hee Jin Cheong","doi":"10.1016/j.vaccine.2024.126506","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.vaccine.2024.126506","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19) vaccination rates in pregnant women remain low owing to safety concerns. When evaluating vaccine safety, comparisons with unvaccinated individuals may lead to healthy vaccinee bias. This study aimed to investigate the association between mRNA-based COVID-19 vaccination and pregnancy-related adverse outcomes compared with influenza vaccination.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A propensity score-matched cohort study was conducted using the National Health Insurance Service insurance claims database, combined with COVID-19 and influenza vaccination registration data from the Korea Disease Control and Prevention Agency. Based on the age, comorbidities, insurance type, region, hospital type, gestational age at vaccination, and primiparity, the COVID-19 vaccination-only group and influenza vaccination-only group were matched in a 1:3 ratio, while both (COVID-19 and influenza) vaccination group and influenza vaccination-only group were also matched in a 1:3 ratio. Logistic regression analysis was used to calculate odds ratios (ORs) with 95 % confidence intervals (CIs) between the two groups.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>From October 18, 2021, to March 3, 2022, 71,902 pregnant women were identified, and the vaccination records of 67,522 individuals were verified. Among them, 610 received the COVID-19 vaccination only, 49,952 received the influenza vaccination only, and 2405 received both vaccines. In the COVID-19 vaccination-only group, the risk of large for gestational age was higher than in the influenza vaccination-only group (OR = 2.285, 95 % CI = 1.155–4.522, <em>P</em> = 0.018). In the group that received both vaccinations, the risk of premature birth was higher (OR = 1.365, 95 % CI = 1.124–1.656, <em>P</em> = 0.002) than that in the influenza vaccination-only group but lower than the domestic baseline incidence rates. No significant differences were observed in other maternal and neonatal outcomes.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>mRNA-based COVID-19 vaccination in pregnant women is safe without a remarkable increase in adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes. Given the high morbidity and mortality rates of COVID-19 in pregnant women, it is reasonable to recommend COVID-19 vaccination for pregnant women.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":23491,"journal":{"name":"Vaccine","volume":"44 ","pages":"Article 126506"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5,"publicationDate":"2024-11-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142707343","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Poor vaccine responders mask the true trend in vaccine effectiveness against progression to severe disease 疫苗反应不佳者掩盖了疫苗在防止疾病恶化方面的真实效果趋势
IF 4.5 3区 医学 Q2 IMMUNOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-11-24 DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2024.126516
Natalie E. Dean , M. Elizabeth Halloran , Veronika I. Zarnitsyna
Vaccines can reduce an individual's risk of infection and their risk of progression to severe disease given infection. The latter effect is less commonly estimated but is relevant for vaccine impact modeling and cost-effectiveness calculations. Using a motivating example from the COVID-19 literature, we note how vaccine effectiveness against progression to severe disease can appear to increase from below 0 % to over 70 % within 8 months. With true biological strengthening of this magnitude being unlikely, we use a mathematical modeling framework to identify parameter combinations where this phenomenon can occur. Fundamental features are an immunocompetent population with high initial protection against infection, contrasted with a vulnerable subpopulation with poor vaccine response against infection and progression. As a result, the earliest infections are among those with the weakest protection against severe disease. This work highlights methodological challenges in isolating a vaccine's effect on progression to severe disease after infection, and it signals the need for refined analytical methods to adjust for differences between the vaccinated infected and the unvaccinated infected populations.
疫苗可以降低个人的感染风险以及感染后恶化为严重疾病的风险。后一种效应较少被估计,但与疫苗影响建模和成本效益计算相关。通过 COVID-19 文献中一个有启发性的例子,我们注意到在 8 个月内,疫苗对严重疾病进展的预防效果似乎从 0% 以下增加到 70% 以上。由于这种程度的真正生物强化不太可能发生,我们使用数学建模框架来确定可能出现这种现象的参数组合。基本特征是免疫能力强的人群对感染具有较高的初始保护能力,而易受感染的亚人群对感染和疾病进展的疫苗反应较差。因此,最早感染的人群对严重疾病的保护能力最弱。这项工作凸显了在分离疫苗对感染后严重疾病进展的影响时所面临的方法学挑战,并表明需要改进分析方法,以调整已接种疫苗的感染人群与未接种疫苗的感染人群之间的差异。
{"title":"Poor vaccine responders mask the true trend in vaccine effectiveness against progression to severe disease","authors":"Natalie E. Dean ,&nbsp;M. Elizabeth Halloran ,&nbsp;Veronika I. Zarnitsyna","doi":"10.1016/j.vaccine.2024.126516","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.vaccine.2024.126516","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Vaccines can reduce an individual's risk of infection and their risk of progression to severe disease given infection. The latter effect is less commonly estimated but is relevant for vaccine impact modeling and cost-effectiveness calculations. Using a motivating example from the COVID-19 literature, we note how vaccine effectiveness against progression to severe disease can appear to increase from below 0 % to over 70 % within 8 months. With true biological strengthening of this magnitude being unlikely, we use a mathematical modeling framework to identify parameter combinations where this phenomenon can occur. Fundamental features are an immunocompetent population with high initial protection against infection, contrasted with a vulnerable subpopulation with poor vaccine response against infection and progression. As a result, the earliest infections are among those with the weakest protection against severe disease. This work highlights methodological challenges in isolating a vaccine's effect on progression to severe disease after infection, and it signals the need for refined analytical methods to adjust for differences between the vaccinated infected and the unvaccinated infected populations.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":23491,"journal":{"name":"Vaccine","volume":"43 ","pages":"Article 126516"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5,"publicationDate":"2024-11-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142702070","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Associations between family planning, healthcare access, and female education and vaccination among under-immunized children 计划生育、医疗保健服务、女性教育与免疫接种不足儿童的疫苗接种之间的关系
IF 4.5 3区 医学 Q2 IMMUNOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-11-24 DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2024.126540
Francisco Castillo-Zunino , Kyra A. Hester , Pinar Keskinocak , Dima Nazzal , Hannah K. Smalley , Matthew C. Freeman

Background

Increasing childhood vaccination, family planning, healthcare access, and women's empowerment are targets of the Sustainable Development Goals (SDG). Barriers to healthcare access impede vaccination; tackling goals holistically could create larger gains than siloed efforts. We studied Nepal, Senegal, and Zambia to test the association between childhood vaccinations and other SDG indicators to identify clustered deprivations. We quantified how under-immunized children with few – or no – vaccines and their mothers were vulnerable in SDG areas.

Methods

We analyzed Demographic and Health Surveys from Nepal, Senegal, and Zambia. Through ordinal logistic regressions, controlling for household/mother's characteristics, we identified strong predictors of the number of vaccine doses one-year-old children received. Through bootstrapping and optimal propensity scores matching, we compared children with no or few vaccine doses (0–2 doses in early 2000s, or 0–4 in late 2010s) to children who received eight doses (DTP1–3, MVC1, Pol1–3, and BCG vaccines).

Findings

Mothers of children who received eight doses were 14–30 % more likely than mothers of children with few or no doses to have accessed a health facility in the last year (95 % CIs were 16–44 % in Nepal 2001, −5 % to 33 % Nepal 2016, 3–26 % Senegal 2005, 1–31 % Senegal 2019, 9–38 % Zambia 2001–02, 7–36 % Zambia 2018), knew on average 0.7–1.5 more contraceptive methods (0.9–2.0 Nepal 2005, 0.1–1.5 Nepal 2016, 0.6–1.7 Senegal 2005, 0.2–1.7 Senegal 2019, 0.1–1.4 Zambia 2001–02, 0.5–1.4 Zambia 2018), and had 10–22 % higher literacy rates (12–32 % Nepal 2001, −7 % to 36 % Nepal 2016, 10–26 % Senegal 2005, −3 to 22 % Senegal 2019, −4 % to 28 % Zambia 2001–02, 5–36 % Zambia 2018).

Interpretation

Children with few or no vaccine doses and their mothers were behind in access to family planning, healthcare, and education compared to fully vaccinated children and their mothers. Such differences can further impede immunizations; integrated education and health services are needed to improve vaccination outcomes.
背景提高儿童疫苗接种率、计划生育、医疗保健普及率和妇女赋权是可持续发展目标 (SDG) 的具体目标。获得医疗保健服务的障碍阻碍了疫苗接种;与各自为政的努力相比,从整体上实现目标可以取得更大的收益。我们对尼泊尔、塞内加尔和赞比亚进行了研究,以检验儿童疫苗接种与其他可持续发展目标指标之间的关联性,从而确定贫困集群。我们对尼泊尔、塞内加尔和赞比亚的人口与健康调查进行了分析。通过控制家庭/母亲特征的序数逻辑回归,我们确定了一岁儿童接种疫苗剂量的有力预测因素。通过引导和最优倾向得分匹配,我们将未接种疫苗或接种疫苗次数较少(2000 年代初为 0-2 次,2010 年代末为 0-4 次)的儿童与接种了 8 次疫苗(DTP1-3、MVC1、Pol1-3 和卡介苗)的儿童进行了比较。研究结果接种八剂疫苗的儿童的母亲在过去一年中到医疗机构就诊的可能性比接种少剂疫苗或未接种疫苗的儿童的母亲高出 14-30% (尼泊尔 2001 年的 95% CIs 为 16-44%,尼泊尔 2016 年为 -5% 至 33%,塞内加尔 2005 年为 3-26%,塞内加尔 2019 年为 1-31%,赞比亚 2001-02 年为 9-38%,赞比亚 2018 年为 7-36%),平均知道 0.多 0.7-1.5 种避孕方法(尼泊尔 2005 年 0.9-2.0,尼泊尔 2016 年 0.1-1.5,塞内加尔 2005 年 0.6-1.7,塞内加尔 2019 年 0.2-1.7,赞比亚 2001-02 年 0.1-1.4,赞比亚 2018 年 0.5-1.4)。4 赞比亚 2018),识字率高 10-22%(尼泊尔 2001 年 12-32%,尼泊尔 2016 年-7%-36%,塞内加尔 2005 年 10-26%,塞内加尔 2019 年-3-22%,赞比亚 2001-02 年-4%-28%,赞比亚 2018 年 5-36%)。解释接种疫苗剂量少或未接种疫苗的儿童及其母亲在获得计划生育、医疗保健和教育方面落后于完全接种疫苗的儿童及其母亲。这种差异会进一步阻碍免疫接种;需要综合的教育和医疗服务来改善疫苗接种结果。
{"title":"Associations between family planning, healthcare access, and female education and vaccination among under-immunized children","authors":"Francisco Castillo-Zunino ,&nbsp;Kyra A. Hester ,&nbsp;Pinar Keskinocak ,&nbsp;Dima Nazzal ,&nbsp;Hannah K. Smalley ,&nbsp;Matthew C. Freeman","doi":"10.1016/j.vaccine.2024.126540","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.vaccine.2024.126540","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Increasing childhood vaccination, family planning, healthcare access, and women's empowerment are targets of the Sustainable Development Goals (SDG). Barriers to healthcare access impede vaccination; tackling goals holistically could create larger gains than siloed efforts. We studied Nepal, Senegal, and Zambia to test the association between childhood vaccinations and other SDG indicators to identify clustered deprivations. We quantified how under-immunized children with few – or no – vaccines and their mothers were vulnerable in SDG areas.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We analyzed Demographic and Health Surveys from Nepal, Senegal, and Zambia. Through ordinal logistic regressions, controlling for household/mother's characteristics, we identified strong predictors of the number of vaccine doses one-year-old children received. Through bootstrapping and optimal propensity scores matching, we compared children with no or few vaccine doses (0–2 doses in early 2000s, or 0–4 in late 2010s) to children who received eight doses (DTP1–3, MVC1, Pol1–3, and BCG vaccines).</div></div><div><h3>Findings</h3><div>Mothers of children who received eight doses were 14–30 % more likely than mothers of children with few or no doses to have accessed a health facility in the last year (95 % CIs were 16–44 % in Nepal 2001, −5 % to 33 % Nepal 2016, 3–26 % Senegal 2005, 1–31 % Senegal 2019, 9–38 % Zambia 2001–02, 7–36 % Zambia 2018), knew on average 0.7–1.5 more contraceptive methods (0.9–2.0 Nepal 2005, 0.1–1.5 Nepal 2016, 0.6–1.7 Senegal 2005, 0.2–1.7 Senegal 2019, 0.1–1.4 Zambia 2001–02, 0.5–1.4 Zambia 2018), and had 10–22 % higher literacy rates (12–32 % Nepal 2001, −7 % to 36 % Nepal 2016, 10–26 % Senegal 2005, −3 to 22 % Senegal 2019, −4 % to 28 % Zambia 2001–02, 5–36 % Zambia 2018).</div></div><div><h3>Interpretation</h3><div>Children with few or no vaccine doses and their mothers were behind in access to family planning, healthcare, and education compared to fully vaccinated children and their mothers. Such differences can further impede immunizations; integrated education and health services are needed to improve vaccination outcomes.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":23491,"journal":{"name":"Vaccine","volume":"44 ","pages":"Article 126540"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5,"publicationDate":"2024-11-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142707276","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
COVID-19 vaccine acceptance and 5C psychological antecedents amid the omicron surge in South Korea and China COVID-19 疫苗在韩国和中国的接种率和 5C 心理诱因。
IF 4.5 3区 医学 Q2 IMMUNOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-11-22 DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2024.126515
Minjung Lee , Chenyuan Qin , Yubin Lee , Jie Deng , Myoungsoon You , Jue Liu

Background

It is crucial to emphasize the necessity of annual COVID-19 vaccination, particularly for vulnerable populations like older and chronically ill individuals.

Objectives

This study aimed to quantify the level of vaccination acceptance and its 5C psychological antecedents in the South Korean and Chinese populations and also to identify the predictors, considering contextual variations that influence vaccine acceptance in both countries.

Methods

A cross-sectional survey study was undertaken in South Korea and China between March 15 and March 30, 2023, coinciding with the emergence of the SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variant in both nations. The study comprised 1000 participants from South Korea and 3000 participants from China. A chi-square analysis, t-tests and multivariable logistic regression analysis were employed to evaluate the factors influencing the acceptance of COVID-19 vaccines.

Results

A higher degree of vaccine acceptance was observed among Chinese participants (48.5 %), in contrast to the 16.8 % among South Koreans. Analyzing the psychological antecedents for vaccination, the Chinese cohort showed high vaccine confidence, whereas South Koreans had increased constraint perceptions. Psychological antecedents, particularly Confidence, play a significant positive role in vaccine acceptance in both South Korea (OR 2.98, CI [2.26–4.01], p < 0.001) and China (OR 2.93, CI [2.58–3.33], p < 0.001), while Constraints in South Korea (OR 0.83, CI [0.69–0.99], p < 0.05) and China (OR 0.86, CI [0.79–0.94], p < 0.001) contribute negatively to vaccine acceptance. Notably, divergent trends in the impact of age and underlying health conditions on vaccine acceptance were observed.

Conclusions

This study reveals a substantial disparity in acceptance, psychological antecedents, and predictors of vaccine acceptance between China and South Korea. This importance of understanding contextual factors influencing public vaccine acceptance is emphasized. There is an urgent need for robust vaccination strategies that boost confidence and alleviate constraints to COVID-19 vaccination, which should be tailored to the unique contextual factors of each country.
背景:强调每年接种 COVID-19 疫苗的必要性至关重要:强调每年接种 COVID-19 疫苗的必要性至关重要,尤其是对于老年人和慢性病患者等易感人群:本研究旨在量化韩国和中国人群对疫苗接种的接受程度及其 5C 心理前因,并考虑影响两国疫苗接受程度的环境变化,确定预测因素:方法:2023 年 3 月 15 日至 3 月 30 日期间,在韩国和中国开展了一项横断面调查研究,当时两国都出现了 SARS-CoV-2 Omicron 变种。韩国有 1000 名参与者,中国有 3000 名参与者。研究采用了卡方分析、t 检验和多变量逻辑回归分析来评估 COVID-19 疫苗接受度的影响因素:结果:中国参与者对疫苗的接受度较高(48.5%),而韩国参与者的接受度仅为 16.8%。在分析接种疫苗的心理诱因时,中国受试者对接种疫苗表现出较高的信心,而韩国受试者则对接种疫苗有更多的约束感。心理前因,尤其是信心,对韩国人接受疫苗起着显著的积极作用(OR 2.98,CI [2.26-4.01],p 结论:中国人和韩国人的疫苗接种率存在显著差异:本研究揭示了中国和韩国在疫苗接受度、心理诱因和预测因素方面的巨大差异。研究强调了了解影响公众疫苗接受度的背景因素的重要性。目前迫切需要强有力的疫苗接种策略,以增强信心并缓解 COVID-19 疫苗接种的限制因素,这些策略应适合每个国家的独特背景因素。
{"title":"COVID-19 vaccine acceptance and 5C psychological antecedents amid the omicron surge in South Korea and China","authors":"Minjung Lee ,&nbsp;Chenyuan Qin ,&nbsp;Yubin Lee ,&nbsp;Jie Deng ,&nbsp;Myoungsoon You ,&nbsp;Jue Liu","doi":"10.1016/j.vaccine.2024.126515","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.vaccine.2024.126515","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>It is crucial to emphasize the necessity of annual COVID-19 vaccination, particularly for vulnerable populations like older and chronically ill individuals.</div></div><div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>This study aimed to quantify the level of vaccination acceptance and its 5C psychological antecedents in the South Korean and Chinese populations and also to identify the predictors, considering contextual variations that influence vaccine acceptance in both countries.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A cross-sectional survey study was undertaken in South Korea and China between March 15 and March 30, 2023, coinciding with the emergence of the SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variant in both nations. The study comprised 1000 participants from South Korea and 3000 participants from China. A chi-square analysis, <em>t</em>-tests and multivariable logistic regression analysis were employed to evaluate the factors influencing the acceptance of COVID-19 vaccines.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A higher degree of vaccine acceptance was observed among Chinese participants (48.5 %), in contrast to the 16.8 % among South Koreans. Analyzing the psychological antecedents for vaccination, the Chinese cohort showed high vaccine confidence, whereas South Koreans had increased constraint perceptions. Psychological antecedents, particularly Confidence, play a significant positive role in vaccine acceptance in both South Korea (OR 2.98, CI [2.26–4.01], <em>p</em> &lt; 0.001) and China (OR 2.93, CI [2.58–3.33], p &lt; 0.001), while Constraints in South Korea (OR 0.83, CI [0.69–0.99], <em>p</em> &lt; 0.05) and China (OR 0.86, CI [0.79–0.94], p &lt; 0.001) contribute negatively to vaccine acceptance. Notably, divergent trends in the impact of age and underlying health conditions on vaccine acceptance were observed.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>This study reveals a substantial disparity in acceptance, psychological antecedents, and predictors of vaccine acceptance between China and South Korea. This importance of understanding contextual factors influencing public vaccine acceptance is emphasized. There is an urgent need for robust vaccination strategies that boost confidence and alleviate constraints to COVID-19 vaccination, which should be tailored to the unique contextual factors of each country.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":23491,"journal":{"name":"Vaccine","volume":"43 ","pages":"Article 126515"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5,"publicationDate":"2024-11-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142696304","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Optimizing protocols for the 919 strain-based bovine ephemeral fever virus vaccine (Ultravac®, Zoetis™): Evaluation of dose-dependent effectiveness and long-term immunity 优化基于 919 株的牛附红细胞体热病毒疫苗(Ultravac®,Zoetis™)的接种方案:剂量依赖性有效性和长期免疫力评估。
IF 4.5 3区 医学 Q2 IMMUNOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-11-22 DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2024.126531
Dan Gleser , Michal Cohen , Gabriel Kenigswald , Maor Kedmi , Benny Sharir , Eyal Klement
Bovine Ephemeral Fever (BEF) is an arthropod-borne virus (arbovirus) that presents a significant challenge to the cattle industry due to its economic impact, primarily through the loss of milk production in dairy cows. Vaccination is the predominant strategy for managing the disease. We recently showed a vaccine effectiveness (VE) of 60 % of a vaccine based on the Australian 919 BEFV isolate, with a natural challenge occurring shortly after the administration of the second dose of the vaccine. Still, there is a lack of data regarding the duration of protective immunity after vaccination and its potential enhancement after the administration of three and four vaccine doses. To answer these questions we conducted a retrospective cohort study of 850 cows (7 herds), analyzing the influence of different vaccination regimens on VE and a serosurvey of 71 cows to test the longevity of BEFV-specific serum-neutralizing antibodies (SNAb). We adopted a quantitative methodology for BEF diagnosis with the use of commercially validated precision dairy monitoring technologies for milk reduction identification. Survival analysis was used to analyze the vaccine dose effectiveness. A Cox regression mixed-effect model (COXME) was fitted to the data. The analysis demonstrated the following VE compared to zero vaccine doses: 82 % (p-value<0.001) for four doses, 66 % (p-value<0.026) for three doses and 39 % (p-value = 0.3) for two doses. Corroborating with the VE results, the four-dose regimen exhibited the highest geometric mean titer (GMT) value (4.45, CI95% = 3.99, 4.91), followed by the three-dose regimen (3.53, CI95% = 3.08,3.98), and the two-dose regimen (2.17, CI95% = 1.77,2.57). In light of these findings, we recommend vaccinating calves as early as four to six months old with two doses spaced one month apart, followed by a third and even fourth dose administered between six to 12 months later, ideally close to the onset of the high-risk season.
牛短暂热(BEF)是一种节肢动物传播的病毒(虫媒病毒),主要通过奶牛产奶量的损失对经济产生影响,因此给养牛业带来了巨大挑战。疫苗接种是控制该疾病的主要策略。我们最近的研究表明,基于澳大利亚 919 BEFV 分离物的疫苗有效率(VE)为 60%,第二剂疫苗接种后不久就会出现自然挑战。然而,关于接种疫苗后保护性免疫力的持续时间及其在接种三剂和四剂疫苗后增强的可能性,目前还缺乏相关数据。为了回答这些问题,我们对 850 头奶牛(7 个牧场)进行了回顾性队列研究,分析了不同疫苗接种方案对 VE 的影响,并对 71 头奶牛进行了血清调查,以检测 BEFV 特异性血清中和抗体 (SNAb) 的持久性。我们采用定量方法诊断 BEF,并使用经过商业验证的精确乳制品监测技术进行牛奶减少鉴定。我们采用了生存分析法来分析疫苗剂量的有效性。数据采用了 Cox 回归混合效应模型 (COXME)。分析表明,与零疫苗剂量相比,VE 值为82%(p-value95% = 3.99,4.91),其次是三剂方案(3.53,CI95% = 3.08,3.98)和两剂方案(2.17,CI95% = 1.77,2.57)。鉴于这些研究结果,我们建议在犊牛四到六个月大时就为其接种疫苗,两次接种间隔一个月,然后在六到十二个月后接种第三次甚至第四次疫苗,最好在接近高风险季节开始时接种。
{"title":"Optimizing protocols for the 919 strain-based bovine ephemeral fever virus vaccine (Ultravac®, Zoetis™): Evaluation of dose-dependent effectiveness and long-term immunity","authors":"Dan Gleser ,&nbsp;Michal Cohen ,&nbsp;Gabriel Kenigswald ,&nbsp;Maor Kedmi ,&nbsp;Benny Sharir ,&nbsp;Eyal Klement","doi":"10.1016/j.vaccine.2024.126531","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.vaccine.2024.126531","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Bovine Ephemeral Fever (BEF) is an arthropod-borne virus (arbovirus) that presents a significant challenge to the cattle industry due to its economic impact<strong>,</strong> primarily through the loss of milk production in dairy cows. Vaccination is the predominant strategy for managing the disease. We recently showed a vaccine effectiveness (VE) of 60 % of a vaccine based on the Australian 919 BEFV isolate, with a natural challenge occurring shortly after the administration of the second dose of the vaccine. Still, there is a lack of data regarding the duration of protective immunity after vaccination and its potential enhancement after the administration of three and four vaccine doses. To answer these questions we conducted a retrospective cohort study of 850 cows (7 herds), analyzing the influence of different vaccination regimens on VE and a serosurvey of 71 cows to test the longevity of BEFV-specific serum-neutralizing antibodies (SNAb). We adopted a quantitative methodology for BEF diagnosis with the use of commercially validated precision dairy monitoring technologies for milk reduction identification. Survival analysis was used to analyze the vaccine dose effectiveness. A Cox regression mixed-effect model (COXME) was fitted to the data. The analysis demonstrated the following VE compared to zero vaccine doses: 82 % (<em>p</em>-value&lt;0.001) for four doses, 66 % (p-value&lt;0.026) for three doses and 39 % (p-value = 0.3) for two doses. Corroborating with the VE results, the four-dose regimen exhibited the highest geometric mean titer (GMT) value (4.45, CI<sub>95%</sub> = 3.99, 4.91), followed by the three-dose regimen (3.53, CI<sub>95%</sub> = 3.08,3.98), and the two-dose regimen (2.17, CI<sub>95%</sub> = 1.77,2.57). In light of these findings, we recommend vaccinating calves as early as four to six months old with two doses spaced one month apart, followed by a third and even fourth dose administered between six to 12 months later, ideally close to the onset of the high-risk season.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":23491,"journal":{"name":"Vaccine","volume":"43 ","pages":"Article 126531"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5,"publicationDate":"2024-11-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142696306","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Herpes zoster vaccination among Medicare beneficiaries with and without prescription drug coverage 有处方药保险和没有处方药保险的医疗保险受益人接种带状疱疹疫苗的情况。
IF 4.5 3区 医学 Q2 IMMUNOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-11-22 DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2024.126537
Yuping Tsai , Jessica Leung , Tara C. Anderson , Fangjun Zhou , James A. Singleton

Introduction

The Inflation Reduction Act (IRA) eliminated cost sharing for Medicare Part D-covered vaccines but did not address the cost burden faced by Medicare beneficiaries who did not have prescription drug coverage. This study aimed to determine the characteristics of beneficiaries without prescription drug coverage and to assess the association between the receipt of a herpes zoster vaccine and prescription drug coverage status.

Methods

We used the 2019–2023 National Health Interview Survey and included Medicare beneficiaries aged 65 years and older who enrolled in both Parts A and B or a Medicare Advantage plan. Descriptive statistics were used to examine beneficiaries' characteristics. Logistic regressions were used to examine the associations between the receipt of a herpes zoster vaccine and Medicare prescription drug coverage.

Results

The study included 33,578 beneficiaries and 93.5 % of beneficiaries had prescription drug coverage. The prevalence of lacking prescription drug coverage was higher among beneficiaries who did not have a college degree, had family income below the poverty level, had no flu shot and well visit within the past year, and had no usual place for care. The probability of receiving a herpes zoster vaccine was higher among beneficiaries with prescription drug coverage than those without prescription coverage (45.2 % versus 25.3 %).

Conclusions

Herpes zoster vaccination disparities between beneficiaries with and without prescription drug coverage existed before the IRA. Because the IRA only addresses the cost barrier facing by beneficiaries with prescription drug coverage, vaccination disparities was greater after the IRA implementation.
导言:通货膨胀削减法》(IRA)取消了医疗保险 D 部分承保疫苗的费用分担,但并未解决没有处方药承保的医疗保险受益人所面临的费用负担问题。本研究旨在确定没有处方药保险的受益人的特征,并评估接种带状疱疹疫苗与处方药保险状况之间的关联:我们使用了 2019-2023 年全国健康访谈调查,纳入了年龄在 65 岁及以上、同时参加了 A 部分和 B 部分或医疗保险优势计划的医疗保险受益人。我们使用描述性统计来研究受益人的特征。逻辑回归用于研究接种带状疱疹疫苗与医疗保险处方药覆盖范围之间的关联:研究包括 33,578 名受益人,93.5% 的受益人有处方药保险。在没有大学学历、家庭收入低于贫困线、过去一年内没有接种过流感疫苗和接受过健康检查以及没有固定医疗场所的受益人中,没有处方药保险的比例较高。有处方药保险的受益人接种带状疱疹疫苗的概率高于没有处方药保险的受益人(45.2% 对 25.3%):结论:在实施 IRA 之前,有处方药保险和没有处方药保险的受益人之间就存在带状疱疹疫苗接种的差异。由于 IRA 只解决了有处方药保险的受益人所面临的费用障碍,因此在 IRA 实施后,接种疫苗的差距更大了。
{"title":"Herpes zoster vaccination among Medicare beneficiaries with and without prescription drug coverage","authors":"Yuping Tsai ,&nbsp;Jessica Leung ,&nbsp;Tara C. Anderson ,&nbsp;Fangjun Zhou ,&nbsp;James A. Singleton","doi":"10.1016/j.vaccine.2024.126537","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.vaccine.2024.126537","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>The Inflation Reduction Act (IRA) eliminated cost sharing for Medicare Part D-covered vaccines but did not address the cost burden faced by Medicare beneficiaries who did not have prescription drug coverage. This study aimed to determine the characteristics of beneficiaries without prescription drug coverage and to assess the association between the receipt of a herpes zoster vaccine and prescription drug coverage status.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We used the 2019–2023 National Health Interview Survey and included Medicare beneficiaries aged 65 years and older who enrolled in both Parts A and B or a Medicare Advantage plan. Descriptive statistics were used to examine beneficiaries' characteristics. Logistic regressions were used to examine the associations between the receipt of a herpes zoster vaccine and Medicare prescription drug coverage.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The study included 33,578 beneficiaries and 93.5 % of beneficiaries had prescription drug coverage. The prevalence of lacking prescription drug coverage was higher among beneficiaries who did not have a college degree, had family income below the poverty level, had no flu shot and well visit within the past year, and had no usual place for care. The probability of receiving a herpes zoster vaccine was higher among beneficiaries with prescription drug coverage than those without prescription coverage (45.2 % versus 25.3 %).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Herpes zoster vaccination disparities between beneficiaries with and without prescription drug coverage existed before the IRA. Because the IRA only addresses the cost barrier facing by beneficiaries with prescription drug coverage, vaccination disparities was greater after the IRA implementation.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":23491,"journal":{"name":"Vaccine","volume":"43 ","pages":"Article 126537"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5,"publicationDate":"2024-11-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142696300","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Report of a SPEAC webinar 22 september 2023: Sensorineural hearing loss, lassa virus disease and vaccines 2023 年 9 月 22 日 SPEAC 网络研讨会报告:感音神经性听力损失、拉萨病毒病和疫苗。
IF 4.5 3区 医学 Q2 IMMUNOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-11-22 DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2024.126525
Nicholas S. Reed , Carmen C. Brewer , Gideon Akintunde , Faustina F. Blackie , Lovelyn Charles , Patricia Fast , Paul-Henri Lambert , Sylvanus Okogbenin , Slobodan Paessler , Daniel D. Pinschewer , Karina A. Top , Steven B. Black , Cornelia L. Dekker
Lassa virus (LASV) belongs to the Arenavirus family. LASV is endemic in several West Africa countries and causes viral hemorrhagic fevers. The Nigeria CDC has reported that an outbreak in 2024 in 28 states has resulted in 7767 suspected cases of Lassa fever, 971 confirmed cases and 166 confirmed deaths up to 11 August. Since infection with LASV can result in sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL) in up to 30% of patients, there are questions about whether triggering the immune response by immunization with LASV vaccines could potentially cause SNHL, although this has not been shown in clinical trials to date. To address this issue, the Coalition for Epidemic Preparedness Innovations (CEPI) and the Brighton Collaboration (BC) Safety Platform for Emergency vACcines (SPEAC) convened a three-hour webinar on 22 September 2023 to review what is known from both animal studies and human clinical trials and how hearing assessments in future clinical trials can help to assess the risk. This report summarizes the evidence presented and provides considerations for hearing assessment in expanded human trials of LASV vaccine candidates in children and adults.
拉沙病毒(LASV)属于阿伦病毒科。拉沙病毒在西非多个国家流行,会引起病毒性出血热。尼日利亚疾病预防控制中心报告称,2024 年在 28 个州爆发的拉沙热疫情截至 8 月 11 日已导致 7767 例疑似病例、971 例确诊病例和 166 例确诊死亡病例。由于感染拉沙热病毒可导致多达 30% 的患者出现感音神经性听力损失 (SNHL),因此有人质疑通过接种拉沙热疫苗来触发免疫反应是否可能导致感音神经性听力损失,尽管迄今为止临床试验尚未证明这一点。为解决这一问题,流行病防备创新联盟 (CEPI) 和布莱顿合作组织 (BC) 紧急疫苗安全平台 (SPEAC) 于 2023 年 9 月 22 日召开了一次三小时的网络研讨会,回顾了动物研究和人体临床试验的已知情况,以及未来临床试验中的听力评估如何帮助评估风险。本报告总结了所提供的证据,并为儿童和成人 LASV 候选疫苗扩大人体试验中的听力评估提供了考虑因素。
{"title":"Report of a SPEAC webinar 22 september 2023: Sensorineural hearing loss, lassa virus disease and vaccines","authors":"Nicholas S. Reed ,&nbsp;Carmen C. Brewer ,&nbsp;Gideon Akintunde ,&nbsp;Faustina F. Blackie ,&nbsp;Lovelyn Charles ,&nbsp;Patricia Fast ,&nbsp;Paul-Henri Lambert ,&nbsp;Sylvanus Okogbenin ,&nbsp;Slobodan Paessler ,&nbsp;Daniel D. Pinschewer ,&nbsp;Karina A. Top ,&nbsp;Steven B. Black ,&nbsp;Cornelia L. Dekker","doi":"10.1016/j.vaccine.2024.126525","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.vaccine.2024.126525","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Lassa virus (LASV) belongs to the Arenavirus family. LASV is endemic in several West Africa countries and causes viral hemorrhagic fevers. The Nigeria CDC has reported that an outbreak in 2024 in 28 states has resulted in 7767 suspected cases of Lassa fever, 971 confirmed cases and 166 confirmed deaths up to 11 August. Since infection with LASV can result in sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL) in up to 30% of patients, there are questions about whether triggering the immune response by immunization with LASV vaccines could potentially cause SNHL, although this has not been shown in clinical trials to date. To address this issue, the Coalition for Epidemic Preparedness Innovations (CEPI) and the Brighton Collaboration (BC) Safety Platform for Emergency vACcines (SPEAC) convened a three-hour webinar on 22 September 2023 to review what is known from both animal studies and human clinical trials and how hearing assessments in future clinical trials can help to assess the risk. This report summarizes the evidence presented and provides considerations for hearing assessment in expanded human trials of LASV vaccine candidates in children and adults.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":23491,"journal":{"name":"Vaccine","volume":"43 ","pages":"Article 126525"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5,"publicationDate":"2024-11-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142696302","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Breakthroughs and insights: A comprehensive review of yellow fever vaccine breakthrough infection across 8 decades 突破与见解:全面回顾八十年来黄热病疫苗的突破性感染。
IF 4.5 3区 医学 Q2 IMMUNOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-11-21 DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2024.126423
Felicity J. Coulter , William B. Messer
The yellow fever vaccine 17D is one of the most successful live-attenuated vaccines ever developed, controlling mosquito-borne yellow fever virus and yellow fever disease worldwide. Introduced in 1937, 17D never underwent rigorous phase III clinical trials to evaluate safety or efficacy, and while protection in the field was quickly established, no prospective evaluation of vaccine efficacy has ever been conducted. One important measure of vaccine efficacy is breakthrough infection resulting from vaccine failure. Yellow fever breakthrough infection was previously formally evaluated in a policy-changing report conducted by the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices in 2015 but has not been reviewed since despite several recent outbreaks in South America and Africa. To address this knowledge gap, we conducted a literature search and reviewed 19 papers documenting breakthrough yellow fever infection between 1944 and 2023. There were up to 7793 suspected and up to 773 confirmed breakthrough cases reported in the literature, including thirteen cohort studies, four case reports, and two case series, which we summarize, evaluate the approaches used, and identify strengths and weakness. This review provides an important and much needed update on the topic of yellow fever breakthrough infection, drawing from recent outbreaks, highlighting limitations, and suggesting future approaches to further advance the field.
黄热病疫苗 17D 是迄今为止开发的最成功的减毒活疫苗之一,可在全球范围内控制由蚊子传播的黄热病病毒和黄热病。17D 于 1937 年推出,但从未进行过严格的 III 期临床试验来评估其安全性或有效性,虽然很快就在当地建立了保护作用,但从未对疫苗的有效性进行过前瞻性评估。疫苗效果的一个重要衡量标准是疫苗失效导致的突破性感染。黄热病突破性感染曾在 2015 年由免疫实践咨询委员会进行的一份改变政策的报告中进行过正式评估,但此后尽管最近在南美和非洲爆发了几次疫情,却再未进行过审查。为了填补这一知识空白,我们进行了文献检索,并查阅了 19 篇记录 1944 年至 2023 年期间黄热病突破性感染的论文。文献中报告了多达 7793 例疑似和 773 例确诊突破性感染病例,其中包括 13 项队列研究、4 项病例报告和 2 项系列病例,我们对这些研究进行了总结,对所用方法进行了评估,并找出了优缺点。本综述就黄热病突破性感染这一主题提供了重要且亟需的最新信息,借鉴了近期的疫情,强调了局限性,并提出了进一步推动该领域发展的未来方法。
{"title":"Breakthroughs and insights: A comprehensive review of yellow fever vaccine breakthrough infection across 8 decades","authors":"Felicity J. Coulter ,&nbsp;William B. Messer","doi":"10.1016/j.vaccine.2024.126423","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.vaccine.2024.126423","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The yellow fever vaccine 17D is one of the most successful live-attenuated vaccines ever developed, controlling mosquito-borne yellow fever virus and yellow fever disease worldwide. Introduced in 1937, 17D never underwent rigorous phase III clinical trials to evaluate safety or efficacy, and while protection in the field was quickly established, no prospective evaluation of vaccine efficacy has ever been conducted. One important measure of vaccine efficacy is breakthrough infection resulting from vaccine failure. Yellow fever breakthrough infection was previously formally evaluated in a policy-changing report conducted by the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices in 2015 but has not been reviewed since despite several recent outbreaks in South America and Africa. To address this knowledge gap, we conducted a literature search and reviewed 19 papers documenting breakthrough yellow fever infection between 1944 and 2023. There were up to 7793 suspected and up to 773 confirmed breakthrough cases reported in the literature, including thirteen cohort studies, four case reports, and two case series, which we summarize, evaluate the approaches used, and identify strengths and weakness. This review provides an important and much needed update on the topic of yellow fever breakthrough infection, drawing from recent outbreaks, highlighting limitations, and suggesting future approaches to further advance the field.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":23491,"journal":{"name":"Vaccine","volume":"43 ","pages":"Article 126423"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5,"publicationDate":"2024-11-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142694089","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
How do national immunization technical advisory groups assess and use evidence: Findings from the SYSVAC survey 国家免疫技术咨询组如何评估和使用证据:SYSVAC 调查的结果。
IF 4.5 3区 医学 Q2 IMMUNOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-11-20 DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2024.126538
Antonia Pilic , Louise Henaff , Christoph Steffen , Ole Wichmann , Vanessa Piechotta , Thomas Harder
National immunization technical advisory groups (NITAGs) develop evidence-based vaccination recommendations. Systematic reviews (SRs) are important tools in that process, but conducting them is very resource-intensive. Given the considerable number of immunization-related SRs published and to minimize duplication of effort, a more practical approach for NITAGs is to use existing SRs. Among multiple initiatives and resources to strengthen NITAGs, the freely accessible SYSVAC registry supports NITAGs in identifying suitable SRs when developing vaccination recommendations. Additional SYSVAC courses provide step-by-step training on how to use SRs.
This cross-sectional survey was conducted online and involved 108 participants globally. The aim was to explore NITAGs user experience with evidence retrieval, to assess impact and use of the SYSVAC resources and training needs. Data were collected using a structured questionnaire.
Most of the respondents were > 45 years old (75.9%) and represented 50 NITAGs from all six World Health Organization (WHO) regions. In total, 13/50 NITAGs (26.0%) had ease accessing full text publications. The preferred data sources to search for evidence were peer reviewed literature via PubMed and the WHO website (Strategic Advisory Group of Experts – SAGE – on Immunization). When developing vaccination recommendations, respondents stated using SRs mostly conducted by SAGE, other institutions or NITAGs (83.2%), recommendations of other countries (79.4%) and primary studies (73.8%). Respondents from 35 NITAGs stated to use the SYSVAC registry to search for evidence, leading to ≥69 recommendations being developed by NITAGs globally with its support. Aside existing SYSVAC courses on SR use, there was great interest in training on SR use in the development of vaccination recommendations.
Our survey gathered information on evidence use and training needs. Survey results serve as a starting point to improve support of NITAGs in developing recommendations.
国家免疫技术咨询组 (NITAG) 制定以证据为基础的疫苗接种建议。系统综述 (SR) 是这一过程中的重要工具,但进行系统综述非常耗费资源。鉴于已出版的与免疫接种相关的系统综述数量可观,为尽量减少重复劳动,NITAG 更为实用的方法是利用现有的系统综述。在加强 NITAG 的多种举措和资源中,可免费访问的 SYSVAC 注册表可帮助 NITAG 在制定疫苗接种建议时识别合适的 SR。此外,SYSVAC 课程还提供如何使用 SR 的分步培训。这项横断面调查在网上进行,全球共有 108 人参与。目的是了解 NITAGs 用户在证据检索方面的经验,评估 SYSVAC 资源的影响和使用情况以及培训需求。数据采用结构化问卷收集。大多数受访者年龄在 45 岁以上(75.9%),代表了来自世界卫生组织(WHO)所有六个地区的 50 个 NITAG。总共有 13/50 个 NITAG(26.0%)难以获取全文出版物。搜索证据的首选数据来源是通过 PubMed 和世卫组织网站(免疫战略专家咨询组)进行的同行评审文献。在制定疫苗接种建议时,受访者表示主要使用由 SAGE、其他机构或 NITAG(83.2%)开展的 SR、其他国家的建议(79.4%)和初级研究(73.8%)。来自 35 个 NITAG 的受访者表示使用 SYSVAC 登记册搜索证据,在其支持下,全球 NITAG 制定了≥69 项建议。除了现有的关于SR使用的SYSVAC课程外,人们对在制定疫苗接种建议时使用SR的培训也非常感兴趣。我们的调查收集了有关证据使用和培训需求的信息。调查结果可作为改善 NITAG 在制定建议方面的支持的起点。
{"title":"How do national immunization technical advisory groups assess and use evidence: Findings from the SYSVAC survey","authors":"Antonia Pilic ,&nbsp;Louise Henaff ,&nbsp;Christoph Steffen ,&nbsp;Ole Wichmann ,&nbsp;Vanessa Piechotta ,&nbsp;Thomas Harder","doi":"10.1016/j.vaccine.2024.126538","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.vaccine.2024.126538","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>National immunization technical advisory groups (NITAGs) develop evidence-based vaccination recommendations. Systematic reviews (SRs) are important tools in that process, but conducting them is very resource-intensive. Given the considerable number of immunization-related SRs published and to minimize duplication of effort, a more practical approach for NITAGs is to use existing SRs. Among multiple initiatives and resources to strengthen NITAGs, the freely accessible SYSVAC registry supports NITAGs in identifying suitable SRs when developing vaccination recommendations. Additional SYSVAC courses provide step-by-step training on how to use SRs.</div><div>This cross-sectional survey was conducted online and involved 108 participants globally. The aim was to explore NITAGs user experience with evidence retrieval, to assess impact and use of the SYSVAC resources and training needs. Data were collected using a structured questionnaire.</div><div>Most of the respondents were &gt; 45 years old (75.9%) and represented 50 NITAGs from all six World Health Organization (WHO) regions. In total, 13/50 NITAGs (26.0%) had ease accessing full text publications. The preferred data sources to search for evidence were peer reviewed literature via PubMed and the WHO website (Strategic Advisory Group of Experts – SAGE – on Immunization). When developing vaccination recommendations, respondents stated using SRs mostly conducted by SAGE, other institutions or NITAGs (83.2%), recommendations of other countries (79.4%) and primary studies (73.8%). Respondents from 35 NITAGs stated to use the SYSVAC registry to search for evidence, leading to ≥69 recommendations being developed by NITAGs globally with its support. Aside existing SYSVAC courses on SR use, there was great interest in training on SR use in the development of vaccination recommendations.</div><div>Our survey gathered information on evidence use and training needs. Survey results serve as a starting point to improve support of NITAGs in developing recommendations.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":23491,"journal":{"name":"Vaccine","volume":"43 ","pages":"Article 126538"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5,"publicationDate":"2024-11-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142690213","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Klebsiella pneumoniae bioconjugate vaccine functional durability in mice 肺炎克雷伯菌生物结合疫苗在小鼠体内的功能持久性。
IF 4.5 3区 医学 Q2 IMMUNOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-11-20 DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2024.126536
Paeton L. Wantuch , Cory J. Knoot , Emily C. Marino , Christian M. Harding , David A. Rosen
Klebsiella pneumoniae is a leading cause of hospital-acquired infections as well as the leading cause of neonatal sepsis worldwide. Further, increasing antibiotic resistance in this pathogen makes K. pneumoniae troublesome to treat. Despite its clinical importance, there is not yet an approved K. pneumoniae vaccine available. Here we tested antibody durability and long-term functionality of two previously reported bioconjugate vaccines targeting the K. pneumoniae capsular type K2 and O-antigen type O1v1. We demonstrate that both antibodies are durable in mice for up to six months with significant IgG titers. However, only the K2 antibodies exhibit functionality out to six months as evidenced by serum bactericidal activity and survival in a murine bacteremia challenge model. These results are another promising step towards demonstrating the clinical capacity of bioconjugate vaccines and their induction of durable antibody responses.
肺炎克雷伯菌是医院获得性感染的主要病因,也是全球新生儿败血症的主要病因。此外,这种病原体对抗生素的耐药性不断增加,使得肺炎克雷伯菌的治疗非常麻烦。尽管肺炎克氏菌在临床上非常重要,但目前还没有获得批准的肺炎克氏菌疫苗。在这里,我们测试了之前报道的两种针对肺炎克氏菌荚膜型 K2 和 O 抗原 O1v1 的生物结合疫苗的抗体持久性和长期功能性。我们证明,这两种抗体在小鼠体内的耐受时间长达六个月,并具有显著的 IgG 滴度。然而,只有 K2 型抗体在小鼠菌血症挑战模型中表现出血清杀菌活性和存活率,证明其在六个月内仍具有功能性。这些结果是证明生物结合疫苗的临床能力及其诱导持久抗体反应的又一充满希望的步骤。
{"title":"Klebsiella pneumoniae bioconjugate vaccine functional durability in mice","authors":"Paeton L. Wantuch ,&nbsp;Cory J. Knoot ,&nbsp;Emily C. Marino ,&nbsp;Christian M. Harding ,&nbsp;David A. Rosen","doi":"10.1016/j.vaccine.2024.126536","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.vaccine.2024.126536","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div><em>Klebsiella pneumoniae</em> is a leading cause of hospital-acquired infections as well as the leading cause of neonatal sepsis worldwide. Further, increasing antibiotic resistance in this pathogen makes <em>K. pneumoniae</em> troublesome to treat. Despite its clinical importance, there is not yet an approved <em>K. pneumoniae</em> vaccine available. Here we tested antibody durability and long-term functionality of two previously reported bioconjugate vaccines targeting the <em>K. pneumoniae</em> capsular type K2 and O-antigen type O1v1. We demonstrate that both antibodies are durable in mice for up to six months with significant IgG titers. However, only the K2 antibodies exhibit functionality out to six months as evidenced by serum bactericidal activity and survival in a murine bacteremia challenge model. These results are another promising step towards demonstrating the clinical capacity of bioconjugate vaccines and their induction of durable antibody responses.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":23491,"journal":{"name":"Vaccine","volume":"43 ","pages":"Article 126536"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5,"publicationDate":"2024-11-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142690214","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Vaccine
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1