Normative Framework for the Regulation of Holdout Creditors in the Sovereign Debt Market

Maria Oluyeju, Olufemi Oluyeju
{"title":"Normative Framework for the Regulation of Holdout Creditors in the Sovereign Debt Market","authors":"Maria Oluyeju, Olufemi Oluyeju","doi":"10.1163/18719732-bja10111","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article challenges the contemporary negative and dismissive narratives about distressed debt hedge funds (<jats:sc>DDHF</jats:sc>s), a subset of holdout creditors. A soft normative framework for regulating this category of creditors and other holdout creditors is however proposed to address their disruptive activities in the sovereign debt market. It is proposed that the Basel <jats:sc>III</jats:sc> framework be a conduit for enforcing the proposed normative framework because hedge funds are customers of institutions subject to Basel <jats:sc>III</jats:sc> oversight. One of the characteristics of these funds is their relatively sophisticated and high use of leverage. The authors therefore envisage the Basel <jats:sc>III</jats:sc> framework being expanded to provide for enforcement in this context. Finally, the normative framework proposed in this article differs from previous proposals including the Sovereign Debt Restructuring Mechanism (<jats:sc>SDRM</jats:sc>) and contractual solutions including Collective Action Clauses (<jats:sc>CAC</jats:sc>s) and exit consents as it proposes the Basel <jats:sc>III</jats:sc> framework as an enforcement mechanism and is not a contractual solution.","PeriodicalId":43487,"journal":{"name":"International Community Law Review","volume":"31 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Community Law Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/18719732-bja10111","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article challenges the contemporary negative and dismissive narratives about distressed debt hedge funds (DDHFs), a subset of holdout creditors. A soft normative framework for regulating this category of creditors and other holdout creditors is however proposed to address their disruptive activities in the sovereign debt market. It is proposed that the Basel III framework be a conduit for enforcing the proposed normative framework because hedge funds are customers of institutions subject to Basel III oversight. One of the characteristics of these funds is their relatively sophisticated and high use of leverage. The authors therefore envisage the Basel III framework being expanded to provide for enforcement in this context. Finally, the normative framework proposed in this article differs from previous proposals including the Sovereign Debt Restructuring Mechanism (SDRM) and contractual solutions including Collective Action Clauses (CACs) and exit consents as it proposes the Basel III framework as an enforcement mechanism and is not a contractual solution.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
主权债务市场中顽固债权人监管的规范框架
这篇文章挑战了当代关于不良债务对冲基金(ddhf)的负面和轻蔑的叙述,ddhf是顽固债权人的一个子集。然而,提出了一个管理这类债权人和其他顽固债权人的软规范框架,以解决他们在主权债务市场上的破坏性活动。由于对冲基金是受巴塞尔协议III监管的机构的客户,因此有人建议将巴塞尔协议III框架作为执行拟议规范框架的渠道。这些基金的特点之一是它们相对复杂和高杠杆的使用。因此,作者设想扩大巴塞尔协议III框架,以提供在这种情况下的执行。最后,本文提出的规范框架不同于以前的建议,包括主权债务重组机制(SDRM)和合同解决方案,包括集体行动条款(CACs)和退出同意,因为它提出巴塞尔协议III框架作为执行机制,而不是合同解决方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
20
期刊介绍: The Journal aims to explore the implications of various traditions of international law, as well as more current perceived hegemonic trends for the idea of an international community. The Journal will also look at the ways and means in which the international community uses and adapts international law to deal with new and emerging challenges. Non-state actors , intergovernmental and non-governmental organisations, individuals, peoples, transnational corporations and civil society as a whole - have changed our outlook on contemporary international law. In addition to States and intergovernmental organizations, they now play an important role.
期刊最新文献
Reflections on the Role of Fairness for the Sources of International Law The Imbalanced Geography of the Law on Use of Force in Self-Defence Government Recognition and the Dispute over the Venezuelan Gold Reserves in the Bank of England The Role of General Assembly Resolutions in the Identification of Customary International Law and the Chagos Archipelago Advisory Opinion An Indigenous Cosmovision for Earth-Centric Governance: Deconstructing the Normative Structure of International Law?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1