Reflections on the Role of Fairness for the Sources of International Law

Roman Kwiecień
{"title":"Reflections on the Role of Fairness for the Sources of International Law","authors":"Roman Kwiecień","doi":"10.1163/18719732-bja10127","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The paper discusses the relationship between the sources of international law and fairness. The author addresses this issue within the framework the following main question: what is the role of fairness for the formal sources of international law? By analysing the relationship between fairness and the formal sources of international law, the author also responds to two other, substantively relevant, questions: is the typology of these sources listed in Article 38 of the Statute of the <jats:sc>ICJ</jats:sc> fair?; is soft law a means to fairness in the sources? The author claims that fairness is neither a material nor formal source of international law but it is a procedural value which supports the legitimacy of the making of international law. Thus, it is relevant to the formal, not material, sources of international law. The term ‘formal sources’ is used in the paper in the twofold meaning. First, as <jats:italic>instrumentum</jats:italic> or ‘containers’ for rules and principles (where the law can be found), and, second, as processes and forms by which rules and principles are made. The author’s proposition is that fairness is primary relevant to the latter meaning. When the international law-making processes are fair, then their results, i.e., the formal sources conceived as <jats:italic>instrumentum</jats:italic> or ‘containers’ are also fair, and the law may be known. Rules and principles of international law are fair when they satisfy the requirements of a fair international law-making process, in particular, certainty, transparency and authoritativeness/representativeness. That is why, fairness may be seen as a crucial criterion of the legitimacy of international law-making processes. There are close relationships between fairness, law-making, legal certainty, effectiveness of rules and principles and the rule of law. These relationships mark the place of fairness in the sources of international law. The author seeks to point out that fairness as a product of the constantly changing social and political environment, does not occur in its pure form in practice. As such, fairness is a ‘matter of degree’ in the international law-making. That is why, a realistic goal of the international legal order is neutralization of unfairness as much as possible.","PeriodicalId":43487,"journal":{"name":"International Community Law Review","volume":"101 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Community Law Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/18719732-bja10127","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The paper discusses the relationship between the sources of international law and fairness. The author addresses this issue within the framework the following main question: what is the role of fairness for the formal sources of international law? By analysing the relationship between fairness and the formal sources of international law, the author also responds to two other, substantively relevant, questions: is the typology of these sources listed in Article 38 of the Statute of the ICJ fair?; is soft law a means to fairness in the sources? The author claims that fairness is neither a material nor formal source of international law but it is a procedural value which supports the legitimacy of the making of international law. Thus, it is relevant to the formal, not material, sources of international law. The term ‘formal sources’ is used in the paper in the twofold meaning. First, as instrumentum or ‘containers’ for rules and principles (where the law can be found), and, second, as processes and forms by which rules and principles are made. The author’s proposition is that fairness is primary relevant to the latter meaning. When the international law-making processes are fair, then their results, i.e., the formal sources conceived as instrumentum or ‘containers’ are also fair, and the law may be known. Rules and principles of international law are fair when they satisfy the requirements of a fair international law-making process, in particular, certainty, transparency and authoritativeness/representativeness. That is why, fairness may be seen as a crucial criterion of the legitimacy of international law-making processes. There are close relationships between fairness, law-making, legal certainty, effectiveness of rules and principles and the rule of law. These relationships mark the place of fairness in the sources of international law. The author seeks to point out that fairness as a product of the constantly changing social and political environment, does not occur in its pure form in practice. As such, fairness is a ‘matter of degree’ in the international law-making. That is why, a realistic goal of the international legal order is neutralization of unfairness as much as possible.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
关于公平对国际法渊源的作用的思考
本文讨论了国际法渊源与公正性之间的关系。作者在以下主要问题的框架内探讨了这一问题:公平对于国际法正式渊源的作用是什么?通过分析公平与国际法正式渊源之间的关系,作者还回答了另外两个实质相关的问题:《国际法院规约》第 38 条所列的这些渊源的类型是否公平? 软法是否是实现渊源公平的手段?作者认为,公平既不是国际法的实质渊源,也不是国际法的正式渊源,但它是一种程序价值,支持国际法制定的合法性。因此,它与国际法的正式渊源相关,而非物质渊源。本文中使用的 "正式渊源 "一词有两层含义。首先,作为规则和原则的工具或 "容器"(在这里可以找到法律);其次,作为制定规则和原则的过程和形式。作者的主张是,公平与后一种含义密切相关。如果国际法的制定过程是公平的,那么其结果,即被视为工具或 "容器 "的正式渊源也是公平的,法律也可能是可知的。当国际法的规则和原则满足公平的国际法制定过程的要求,特别是确定性、透明度和权威性/代表性的要求时,它们就是公平的。因此,公平性可被视为国际法制定过程合法性的重要标准。公平、制定法律、法律的确定性、规则和原则的有效性以及法治之间有着密切的关系。这些关系标志着公平在国际法渊源中的地位。作者试图指出,公平作为不断变化的社会和政治环境的产物,在实践中并不以纯粹的形式出现。因此,公平在国际法制定中是一个 "程度问题"。因此,国际法律秩序的一个现实目标就是尽可能地消除不公平。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
20
期刊介绍: The Journal aims to explore the implications of various traditions of international law, as well as more current perceived hegemonic trends for the idea of an international community. The Journal will also look at the ways and means in which the international community uses and adapts international law to deal with new and emerging challenges. Non-state actors , intergovernmental and non-governmental organisations, individuals, peoples, transnational corporations and civil society as a whole - have changed our outlook on contemporary international law. In addition to States and intergovernmental organizations, they now play an important role.
期刊最新文献
Reflections on the Role of Fairness for the Sources of International Law The Imbalanced Geography of the Law on Use of Force in Self-Defence Government Recognition and the Dispute over the Venezuelan Gold Reserves in the Bank of England The Role of General Assembly Resolutions in the Identification of Customary International Law and the Chagos Archipelago Advisory Opinion An Indigenous Cosmovision for Earth-Centric Governance: Deconstructing the Normative Structure of International Law?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1