Gender Gaps in Time Use and Labor Market Outcomes: What’s Norms Got to Do with it?

IF 1 4区 管理学 Q3 INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS & LABOR Journal of Labor Research Pub Date : 2020-08-29 DOI:10.1007/s12122-020-09306-3
Nan L. Maxwell, Nathan Wozny
{"title":"Gender Gaps in Time Use and Labor Market Outcomes: What’s Norms Got to Do with it?","authors":"Nan L. Maxwell, Nathan Wozny","doi":"10.1007/s12122-020-09306-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Although economists typically use efficiency gains to explain gender differences in time use and earnings, norms might also explain those differences. No study has attempted to quantify their relative influence, however. We use the American Community Survey and the American Time Use Survey to estimate an upper bound of the influence of efficiency gains relative to norms—broadly defined—using four groups of demographically matched individuals with relatively homogeneous within-group need for production. Results suggest that norms about work and home may explain 40% of the gap in time allocation for work and household production and about 60% of the wage gap. Norms about parenting may explain an additional 16 to 20% of the time use gaps and 25% of the wage gap. These findings suggest that research and policy might benefit from a grounding in a broad framework that includes both norms and efficiency gains.","PeriodicalId":46592,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Labor Research","volume":"3 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-08-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Labor Research","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12122-020-09306-3","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS & LABOR","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Although economists typically use efficiency gains to explain gender differences in time use and earnings, norms might also explain those differences. No study has attempted to quantify their relative influence, however. We use the American Community Survey and the American Time Use Survey to estimate an upper bound of the influence of efficiency gains relative to norms—broadly defined—using four groups of demographically matched individuals with relatively homogeneous within-group need for production. Results suggest that norms about work and home may explain 40% of the gap in time allocation for work and household production and about 60% of the wage gap. Norms about parenting may explain an additional 16 to 20% of the time use gaps and 25% of the wage gap. These findings suggest that research and policy might benefit from a grounding in a broad framework that includes both norms and efficiency gains.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
时间使用和劳动力市场结果的性别差距:规范与之有何关系?
尽管经济学家通常用效率增益来解释时间使用和收入方面的性别差异,但规范也可能解释这些差异。然而,没有研究试图量化它们的相对影响。我们使用美国社区调查和美国时间使用调查来估计相对于规范(广义定义)的效率增益影响的上限,使用四组人口统计学匹配的个体,组内生产需求相对均匀。结果表明,关于工作和家庭的规范可以解释40%的工作和家庭生产的时间分配差距,以及大约60%的工资差距。另外,育儿规范可能解释了16%至20%的时间使用差距和25%的工资差距。这些发现表明,研究和政策可能受益于一个既包括规范又包括效率提高的广泛框架。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Labor Research
Journal of Labor Research INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS & LABOR-
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
12.50%
发文量
12
期刊介绍: Mission Statement The Journal of Labor Research provides an outlet for original research on all aspects of behavior affecting labor market outcomes. The Journal provides a forum for both empirical and theoretical research on labor economics. The journal welcomes submissions issues relating to labor markets and employment relations, including labor demand and supply, personnel economics, unions and collective bargaining, employee participation, dispute resolution, labor market policies, types of employment relationships, the interplay between labor market variables and policy issues in labor economics are published by the Journal. The Journal of Labor Research also publishes book reviews relating to these topics.
期刊最新文献
The Effect of Paid Maternity Leave on Fertility and Mothers’ Labor Force Participation Correction to: Childcare Responsibilities and Parental Labor Market Outcomes During the COVID-19 Pandemic Childcare Responsibilities and Parental Labor Market Outcomes During the COVID-19 Pandemic The incidence and effects of decentralized wage bargaining in Finland Mobile Politicians: Opportunistic Career Moves
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1