Monopsony Power in Occupational Labor Markets

IF 1 4区 管理学 Q3 INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS & LABOR Journal of Labor Research Pub Date : 2019-06-03 DOI:10.1007/s12122-019-09289-w
Fabio Méndez, Facundo Sepúlveda
{"title":"Monopsony Power in Occupational Labor Markets","authors":"Fabio Méndez, Facundo Sepúlveda","doi":"10.1007/s12122-019-09289-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We collect data from the 1979 National Longitudinal Survey of Youth and create comparable measures of monopsonistic power for up to 46 occupational labor markets in the USA, starting in 1979 and ending in 2000. Our results suggest most occupational labor markets during that period were characterized by substantial amounts of monopsonistic, wage-setting power. Furthermore, after controlling for individual, time, and industry fixed effects, our results show a negative and significant correlation between the extent of monopsony power that characterizes a market and both, the wages and fringe benefits received by workers.","PeriodicalId":46592,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Labor Research","volume":"106 1-3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-06-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Labor Research","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12122-019-09289-w","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS & LABOR","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

We collect data from the 1979 National Longitudinal Survey of Youth and create comparable measures of monopsonistic power for up to 46 occupational labor markets in the USA, starting in 1979 and ending in 2000. Our results suggest most occupational labor markets during that period were characterized by substantial amounts of monopsonistic, wage-setting power. Furthermore, after controlling for individual, time, and industry fixed effects, our results show a negative and significant correlation between the extent of monopsony power that characterizes a market and both, the wages and fringe benefits received by workers.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
职业劳动力市场中的垄断力量
我们收集了1979年全国青年纵向调查的数据,并对美国46个职业劳动力市场的垄断力量进行了比较,从1979年开始到2000年结束。我们的研究结果表明,在这一时期,大多数职业劳动力市场的特点是大量的垄断,工资设定权力。此外,在控制了个人、时间和行业固定效应之后,我们的结果显示,市场垄断程度与工人获得的工资和附加福利两者之间存在显著的负相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Labor Research
Journal of Labor Research INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS & LABOR-
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
12.50%
发文量
12
期刊介绍: Mission Statement The Journal of Labor Research provides an outlet for original research on all aspects of behavior affecting labor market outcomes. The Journal provides a forum for both empirical and theoretical research on labor economics. The journal welcomes submissions issues relating to labor markets and employment relations, including labor demand and supply, personnel economics, unions and collective bargaining, employee participation, dispute resolution, labor market policies, types of employment relationships, the interplay between labor market variables and policy issues in labor economics are published by the Journal. The Journal of Labor Research also publishes book reviews relating to these topics.
期刊最新文献
The Effect of Paid Maternity Leave on Fertility and Mothers’ Labor Force Participation Correction to: Childcare Responsibilities and Parental Labor Market Outcomes During the COVID-19 Pandemic Childcare Responsibilities and Parental Labor Market Outcomes During the COVID-19 Pandemic The incidence and effects of decentralized wage bargaining in Finland Mobile Politicians: Opportunistic Career Moves
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1