Maternal–Fetal Attachment and Domestic Violence Against Iranian and Afghan Pregnant Women: A Cross-Cultural Study

IF 1.5 Q2 CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY Violence and Gender Pub Date : 2021-12-01 DOI:10.1089/vio.2020.0101
Mahlagha Dehghan, Jamileh Farokhzadian, Hakimeh Ferdosi, Faroukh Abazari, Parya Jangipour Afshar, Hojjat Sheikhbardsiri
{"title":"Maternal–Fetal Attachment and Domestic Violence Against Iranian and Afghan Pregnant Women: A Cross-Cultural Study","authors":"Mahlagha Dehghan, Jamileh Farokhzadian, Hakimeh Ferdosi, Faroukh Abazari, Parya Jangipour Afshar, Hojjat Sheikhbardsiri","doi":"10.1089/vio.2020.0101","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Women who have experienced more physical and psychological violence are at a higher risk of stress and depression and cannot develop a relationship with their fetuses. The present study aimed to compare maternal–fetal attachment (MFA) and domestic violence (DV) against Iranian pregnant women (IPW) and Afghan pregnant women (APW). This cross-sectional study was conducted on IPW and APW referred to Kerman health care facilities in 2019. The multistage, cluster-stratified sampling method was used and 300 questionnaires were distributed, of which 12 incomplete questionnaires were excluded. A total of 146 IPW and 142 APW completed the study. Data collection tools were the demographic and clinical information questionnaire, maternal–fetal attachment scale, and domestic violence questionnaire. Results showed that the mean scores of MFA in IPW and APW were 92.87 ± 12.55 and 103.6 ± 19.65, respectively. In addition, the mean scores of DV in IPW and APW were 9.63 ± 8.13 and 10.51 ± 9.1, respectively. A significant reverse correlation was found between the MFA and DV variables in IPW (<i>r</i> = −0.18, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.05) and APW (<i>r</i> = −0.14, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.05). A significant difference was found between the MFA and job status, as well as between DV and husband's addiction, in IPW. In addition, a significant difference was observed between MFA and unplanned pregnancy as well as between DV, unplanned pregnancy, history of physical illness, housing status, fetal gender, and number of children in APW. Multiple regression models showed that among DV components, verbal violence had more significant correlation with MFA in IPW and sexual violence had more significant correlation with MFA in APW. This study examined the MFA and DV against IPW and APW. Results suggest that national and local policies in Iran should examine factors contributing to DV against IPW and APW and focus on how to reduce the impact of DV on MFA.","PeriodicalId":45010,"journal":{"name":"Violence and Gender","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Violence and Gender","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/vio.2020.0101","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Women who have experienced more physical and psychological violence are at a higher risk of stress and depression and cannot develop a relationship with their fetuses. The present study aimed to compare maternal–fetal attachment (MFA) and domestic violence (DV) against Iranian pregnant women (IPW) and Afghan pregnant women (APW). This cross-sectional study was conducted on IPW and APW referred to Kerman health care facilities in 2019. The multistage, cluster-stratified sampling method was used and 300 questionnaires were distributed, of which 12 incomplete questionnaires were excluded. A total of 146 IPW and 142 APW completed the study. Data collection tools were the demographic and clinical information questionnaire, maternal–fetal attachment scale, and domestic violence questionnaire. Results showed that the mean scores of MFA in IPW and APW were 92.87 ± 12.55 and 103.6 ± 19.65, respectively. In addition, the mean scores of DV in IPW and APW were 9.63 ± 8.13 and 10.51 ± 9.1, respectively. A significant reverse correlation was found between the MFA and DV variables in IPW (r = −0.18, p < 0.05) and APW (r = −0.14, p < 0.05). A significant difference was found between the MFA and job status, as well as between DV and husband's addiction, in IPW. In addition, a significant difference was observed between MFA and unplanned pregnancy as well as between DV, unplanned pregnancy, history of physical illness, housing status, fetal gender, and number of children in APW. Multiple regression models showed that among DV components, verbal violence had more significant correlation with MFA in IPW and sexual violence had more significant correlation with MFA in APW. This study examined the MFA and DV against IPW and APW. Results suggest that national and local policies in Iran should examine factors contributing to DV against IPW and APW and focus on how to reduce the impact of DV on MFA.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
伊朗和阿富汗孕妇的母胎依恋与家庭暴力:一项跨文化研究
遭受更多身体和心理暴力的妇女面临更高的压力和抑郁风险,无法与胎儿建立关系。本研究旨在比较伊朗孕妇(IPW)和阿富汗孕妇(APW)的母胎依恋(MFA)和家庭暴力(DV)。本横断面研究是在2019年对克尔曼医疗机构的IPW和APW进行的。采用多阶段整群分层抽样方法,共发放问卷300份,剔除不完整问卷12份。共有146名IPW和142名APW完成了这项研究。数据收集工具为人口统计学和临床信息问卷、母胎依恋量表和家庭暴力问卷。结果IPW和APW的MFA平均评分分别为92.87±12.55和103.6±19.65。此外,IPW和APW的DV平均得分分别为9.63±8.13和10.51±9.1。IPW (r = - 0.18, p < 0.05)和APW (r = - 0.14, p < 0.05)的MFA和DV变量之间呈显著负相关。在IPW中,MFA与工作状态、家暴与丈夫成瘾之间存在显著差异。此外,MFA与计划外妊娠、家庭暴力、计划外妊娠、身体病史、住房状况、胎儿性别、子女数量在APW中存在显著差异。多元回归模型显示,在家庭暴力构成要素中,言语暴力与家庭暴力行为的相关性更显著,性暴力与家庭暴力行为的相关性更显著。本研究考察了MFA和DV对IPW和APW的影响。结果表明,伊朗的国家和地方政策应研究导致家庭暴力与IPW和APW的因素,并将重点放在如何减少家庭暴力对MFA的影响上。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Violence and Gender
Violence and Gender CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY-
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
6.70%
发文量
23
期刊介绍: Violence and Gender is the only peer-reviewed journal focusing on the role of gender in the understanding, prediction, and prevention of acts of violence. The Journal is the international forum for the critical examination of biological, genetic, behavioral, psychological, racial, ethnic, and cultural factors as they relate to the gender of perpetrators of violence. Through peer-reviewed research, roundtable discussions, case studies, and other original content, Violence and Gender explores the difficult issues that are vital to threat assessment and prevention of the epidemic of violence. Violence and Gender coverage includes: Alcohol and chemical use/abuse Anthropology, social, and cultural influences Biology and physiology Brain health Brain trauma & injury Early childhood development Environmental influences Gender Genetics Group violence: gang, peer, political, government, and religious Mental health: illnesses, disorders, diseases, and conditions Neuropsychology Neuroscience Paraphilic behavior Parenting and familial influences Peer influences Personality and temperament Predatory behavior & aggression Psychopathy Psychopharmacology School, college/university, and workplace influences Sexuality Spirituality Suicidology Threat assessment warning behaviors Video games, films, television, the Internet, and media Violent fantasies Weapons.
期刊最新文献
Intimate Partner Violence on Women: The Relationship Between Perceived Stress, Posttraumatic Cognitions, Mental Health, and Emotional Intelligence Gender Violence and Sexual Harassment Against Women Within Academic Spaces: Challenges and Constraints Gender-Based Heat Map Images of Campus Walking Settings: A Reflection of Lived Experience Questioning Gender Assumptions of Domestic Violence Intervention Programs: A Qualitative Study Reproductive Coercion and Abuse: The Potential Protective Scope of Existing Family Violence Legislation in Australia
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1