Impact of upward and downward earnings management on stock returns

Asgar Ali, Manish Bansal
{"title":"Impact of upward and downward earnings management on stock returns","authors":"Asgar Ali, Manish Bansal","doi":"10.1108/sajbs-12-2020-0417","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3>Purpose</h3>\n<p>The current study aims at examining the impact of upward and downward earnings management on the cross-sections of stock return. The study also examines the moderating role of cross-sectional effects on the association between earnings management and stock returns.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Design/methodology/approach</h3>\n<p>The study employed univariate and bivariate-sorted portfolio-level analysis to investigate the issue. Fama–Macbeth cross-sectional regression is used to analyze the moderating role of different cross-sectional effects. The study used a sample of 3085 Bombay Stock Exchange (BSE) listed stocks spanning over 20 years from January 2000 to December 2019.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Findings</h3>\n<p>The findings suggest that investors have different perceptions toward different forms of earnings management. In other words, results exhibit that investors perceive downward earnings management as an element of risk; hence, they discount the returns at a higher rate. On the contrary, results show that upward earnings management is positively perceived by the investors; hence, they hold the stocks even at a lower rate of return. This relation is found to be consistent even after controlling the impact of marker effect, size effect, value effect and momentum effect.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Originality/value</h3>\n<p>This study is among pioneering studies that consider the direction of earnings management while examining its impact on the stock return. This study is also among the earlier attempts to examine the moderating role of four different cross-sectional effects by taking a uniform sample of stocks over the same period.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->","PeriodicalId":55618,"journal":{"name":"South Asian Journal of Business Studies","volume":"12 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"South Asian Journal of Business Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/sajbs-12-2020-0417","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

Purpose

The current study aims at examining the impact of upward and downward earnings management on the cross-sections of stock return. The study also examines the moderating role of cross-sectional effects on the association between earnings management and stock returns.

Design/methodology/approach

The study employed univariate and bivariate-sorted portfolio-level analysis to investigate the issue. Fama–Macbeth cross-sectional regression is used to analyze the moderating role of different cross-sectional effects. The study used a sample of 3085 Bombay Stock Exchange (BSE) listed stocks spanning over 20 years from January 2000 to December 2019.

Findings

The findings suggest that investors have different perceptions toward different forms of earnings management. In other words, results exhibit that investors perceive downward earnings management as an element of risk; hence, they discount the returns at a higher rate. On the contrary, results show that upward earnings management is positively perceived by the investors; hence, they hold the stocks even at a lower rate of return. This relation is found to be consistent even after controlling the impact of marker effect, size effect, value effect and momentum effect.

Originality/value

This study is among pioneering studies that consider the direction of earnings management while examining its impact on the stock return. This study is also among the earlier attempts to examine the moderating role of four different cross-sectional effects by taking a uniform sample of stocks over the same period.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
上行和下行盈余管理对股票收益的影响
目的本研究旨在探讨盈余向上管理与盈余向下管理对股票收益横截面的影响。研究还考察了横截面效应对盈余管理与股票收益之间关系的调节作用。设计/方法/方法本研究采用单变量和双变量分类的投资组合水平分析来调查这个问题。采用Fama-Macbeth横截面回归分析不同横截面效应的调节作用。该研究使用了2000年1月至2019年12月20年间孟买证券交易所(BSE) 3085只上市股票的样本。研究结果表明,投资者对不同形式的盈余管理有不同的看法。换句话说,结果表明,投资者将向下的盈余管理视为风险因素;因此,他们以更高的比率贴现收益。相反,结果表明,向上的盈余管理对投资者有积极的感知;因此,即使回报率较低,他们也会持有股票。即使在控制了市场效应、规模效应、价值效应和动量效应的影响后,这种关系仍然是一致的。原创性/价值本研究是在考察盈余管理对股票收益影响的同时考虑盈余管理方向的开创性研究之一。这项研究也是较早的尝试之一,通过在同一时期采取统一的库存样本来检查四种不同的横截面效应的调节作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
8.30%
发文量
18
期刊最新文献
Fostering sustainable employability: the nexus of social support and career competencies in healthcare Financial awareness, investment strategies and investor satisfaction: a multilayered empirical model testing in the Indian context Analytical modeling of perceived authenticity in AI assistants: application of PLS-predict algorithm and importance-performance map analysis Manifestations of loan growth – profitability and non-performing loans – a study of the Indian banking sector Do justice perceptions of performance appraisal practices affect organizational citizenship behavior through affective commitment? Evidence from the information technology industry
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1