Benthic community establishment on different concrete mixtures introduced to a German deep-water port

4区 地球科学 Q2 Agricultural and Biological Sciences Helgoland Marine Research Pub Date : 2021-06-19 DOI:10.1186/s10152-021-00550-3
Lydia R. Becker, Ingrid Kröncke, Andreas Ehrenberg, Volkert Feldrappe, Kai Bischof
{"title":"Benthic community establishment on different concrete mixtures introduced to a German deep-water port","authors":"Lydia R. Becker, Ingrid Kröncke, Andreas Ehrenberg, Volkert Feldrappe, Kai Bischof","doi":"10.1186/s10152-021-00550-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Concrete is a widely used building material in coastal constructions worldwide. However, limited natural resources used in the production process, as well as high CO2-emission due to the calcination process of limestone and the thermal energy demand for Portland cement clinker production, raise the demand for alternative constituents. Alternative mixture types should be environmentally friendly and, at best, mimic natural hard substrates. Here five different concrete mixtures, containing different cements (Portland cement and blast furnace cements) and aggregates (sand, gravel, iron ore and metallurgical slags) were made. Three replicate cubes (15 × 15 × 15 cm) of each type were then deployed in a German deep-water Port, the JadeWeserPort, to study benthic community establishment after one year. Results are compared to a similar experiment conducted in a natural hard ground environment (Helgoland Island, Germany). Results indicate marked differences in settled communities in the Port site compared to natural environments. At the Port site community composition did not differ with the concrete mixtures. Surface orientation of the cubes (front/top/back) revealed significant differences in species abundances and compositions. Cubes hold more neobiota in the Port site than in natural hard ground environments. Implications for the usage of new concrete mixtures are discussed.","PeriodicalId":55063,"journal":{"name":"Helgoland Marine Research","volume":"59 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Helgoland Marine Research","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s10152-021-00550-3","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Concrete is a widely used building material in coastal constructions worldwide. However, limited natural resources used in the production process, as well as high CO2-emission due to the calcination process of limestone and the thermal energy demand for Portland cement clinker production, raise the demand for alternative constituents. Alternative mixture types should be environmentally friendly and, at best, mimic natural hard substrates. Here five different concrete mixtures, containing different cements (Portland cement and blast furnace cements) and aggregates (sand, gravel, iron ore and metallurgical slags) were made. Three replicate cubes (15 × 15 × 15 cm) of each type were then deployed in a German deep-water Port, the JadeWeserPort, to study benthic community establishment after one year. Results are compared to a similar experiment conducted in a natural hard ground environment (Helgoland Island, Germany). Results indicate marked differences in settled communities in the Port site compared to natural environments. At the Port site community composition did not differ with the concrete mixtures. Surface orientation of the cubes (front/top/back) revealed significant differences in species abundances and compositions. Cubes hold more neobiota in the Port site than in natural hard ground environments. Implications for the usage of new concrete mixtures are discussed.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在不同混凝土混合物上建立底栖生物群落引入德国深水港
混凝土是世界各国沿海建筑中广泛使用的一种建筑材料。然而,生产过程中使用的有限的自然资源,以及石灰石煅烧过程产生的高二氧化碳排放和波特兰水泥熟料生产的热能需求,提高了对替代成分的需求。替代混合物类型应该是环保的,最好是模仿自然的硬基质。在这里制作了五种不同的混凝土混合物,含有不同的水泥(波特兰水泥和高炉水泥)和骨料(砂、砾石、铁矿石和冶金渣)。然后将每种类型的三个复制立方体(15 × 15 × 15 cm)放置在德国深水港JadeWeserPort,研究一年后底栖生物群落的建立。结果与在自然硬地环境中进行的类似实验(德国Helgoland岛)进行了比较。结果表明,与自然环境相比,港口遗址的定居社区存在显著差异。在港口地区,社区组成与混凝土混合物没有差异。立方体的表面朝向(前/上/后)显示出物种丰度和组成的显著差异。在港口场地,立方体比在自然硬地面环境中容纳更多的新生物。讨论了使用新型混凝土混合料的意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Helgoland Marine Research
Helgoland Marine Research 地学-海洋学
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Helgoland Marine Research is an open access, peer reviewed journal, publishing original research as well as reviews on all aspects of marine and brackish water ecosystems, with a focus on how organisms survive in, and interact with, their environment. The aim of Helgoland Marine Research is to publish work with a regional focus, but with clear global implications, or vice versa; research with global emphasis and regional ramifications. We are particularly interested in contributions that further our general understanding of how marine ecosystems work, and that concentrate on species’ interactions.
期刊最新文献
Variation characteristics of ocean sediment Fe levels and their relationship with grain sizes in culture areas over a long period Who lives where? Macrobenthic species distribution over sediment types and depth classes in the eastern North Sea In the Asia-Pacific region, the COI DNA test revealed the divergence of the bivalve mollusc Mactra chinensis into three species; can these species be distinguished using shell coloration and sperm structure? Living and dead foraminiferal assemblage from the supratidal sand Japsand, North Frisian Wadden Sea: distributional patterns and controlling factors Benthic community establishment on different concrete mixtures introduced to a German deep-water port
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1