Strategic Marketing Information System Planning: An Integrated BWM–ELECTRE Approach

IF 3.6 4区 管理学 Q2 MANAGEMENT Group Decision and Negotiation Pub Date : 2023-11-22 DOI:10.1007/s10726-023-09861-x
Nitidetch Koohathongsumrit, Pongchanun Luangpaiboon
{"title":"Strategic Marketing Information System Planning: An Integrated BWM–ELECTRE Approach","authors":"Nitidetch Koohathongsumrit, Pongchanun Luangpaiboon","doi":"10.1007/s10726-023-09861-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Under competitive business scenarios, project selection is a crucial process for ensuring that projects appropriately align with an organization’s goals, available resources, and relationships. This study proposes a novel hybrid decision support model that integrates the best–worst method (BWM) with the elimination and choice expressing reality (ELECTRE) method to solve project selection problems. The approach can be used to determine the weights of criteria by comparing two vectors and to provide the best result based on concordance and discordance analysis. An empirical study regarding the selection of strategic marketing information system projects is conducted to demonstrate the proposed methodology’s benefits and rationality. The findings show that using the BWM–ELECTRE approach systematically leads to solid decision-making results involving compromise rankings based on quantitative and qualitative data, including decision-makers’ preferences. This study contributes to the literature with a new methodology that consumes less time, provides high consistency, and enables subjectivity reduction in human-based judgments while providing helpful information to decision-makers in choosing the best project and/or outranking results among different relationships, resource constraints, or dynamic environments.</p>","PeriodicalId":47553,"journal":{"name":"Group Decision and Negotiation","volume":"67 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Group Decision and Negotiation","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10726-023-09861-x","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Under competitive business scenarios, project selection is a crucial process for ensuring that projects appropriately align with an organization’s goals, available resources, and relationships. This study proposes a novel hybrid decision support model that integrates the best–worst method (BWM) with the elimination and choice expressing reality (ELECTRE) method to solve project selection problems. The approach can be used to determine the weights of criteria by comparing two vectors and to provide the best result based on concordance and discordance analysis. An empirical study regarding the selection of strategic marketing information system projects is conducted to demonstrate the proposed methodology’s benefits and rationality. The findings show that using the BWM–ELECTRE approach systematically leads to solid decision-making results involving compromise rankings based on quantitative and qualitative data, including decision-makers’ preferences. This study contributes to the literature with a new methodology that consumes less time, provides high consistency, and enables subjectivity reduction in human-based judgments while providing helpful information to decision-makers in choosing the best project and/or outranking results among different relationships, resource constraints, or dynamic environments.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
战略营销信息系统规划:一个集成的BWM-ELECTRE方法
在竞争激烈的业务场景下,项目选择是确保项目与组织的目标、可用资源和关系适当结合的关键过程。本文提出了一种新的混合决策支持模型,该模型将最佳-最差方法(BWM)与消除和选择表达现实(ELECTRE)方法相结合来解决项目选择问题。该方法可以通过比较两个向量来确定指标的权重,并根据一致性和不一致性分析提供最佳结果。通过对战略营销信息系统项目选择的实证研究,论证了所提出方法的效益和合理性。研究结果表明,系统地使用BWM-ELECTRE方法可以得出可靠的决策结果,其中包括基于定量和定性数据(包括决策者的偏好)的折衷排名。该研究为文献提供了一种新的方法,该方法消耗的时间更少,提供了高一致性,并且能够减少基于人的判断的主观性,同时为决策者在不同关系,资源约束或动态环境中选择最佳项目和/或排名结果提供了有用的信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
6.70%
发文量
32
期刊介绍: The idea underlying the journal, Group Decision and Negotiation, emerges from evolving, unifying approaches to group decision and negotiation processes. These processes are complex and self-organizing involving multiplayer, multicriteria, ill-structured, evolving, dynamic problems. Approaches include (1) computer group decision and negotiation support systems (GDNSS), (2) artificial intelligence and management science, (3) applied game theory, experiment and social choice, and (4) cognitive/behavioral sciences in group decision and negotiation. A number of research studies combine two or more of these fields. The journal provides a publication vehicle for theoretical and empirical research, and real-world applications and case studies. In defining the domain of group decision and negotiation, the term `group'' is interpreted to comprise all multiplayer contexts. Thus, organizational decision support systems providing organization-wide support are included. Group decision and negotiation refers to the whole process or flow of activities relevant to group decision and negotiation, not only to the final choice itself, e.g. scanning, communication and information sharing, problem definition (representation) and evolution, alternative generation and social-emotional interaction. Descriptive, normative and design viewpoints are of interest. Thus, Group Decision and Negotiation deals broadly with relation and coordination in group processes. Areas of application include intraorganizational coordination (as in operations management and integrated design, production, finance, marketing and distribution, e.g. as in new products and global coordination), computer supported collaborative work, labor-management negotiations, interorganizational negotiations, (business, government and nonprofits -- e.g. joint ventures), international (intercultural) negotiations, environmental negotiations, etc. The journal also covers developments of software f or group decision and negotiation.
期刊最新文献
GAN-Based Privacy-Preserving Intelligent Medical Consultation Decision-Making UCD–CE Integration: A Hybrid Approach to Reinforcing User Involvement in Systems Requirements Elicitation and Analysis Tasks Fostering Psychological Safety in Global Virtual Teams: The Role of Team-Based Interventions and Digital Reminder Nudges Advancing Content Synthesis in Macro-Task Crowdsourcing Facilitation Leveraging Natural Language Processing On the Combinatorial Acceptability Entropy Consensus Metric for Multi-Criteria Group Decisions
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1