{"title":"Strategic Marketing Information System Planning: An Integrated BWM–ELECTRE Approach","authors":"Nitidetch Koohathongsumrit, Pongchanun Luangpaiboon","doi":"10.1007/s10726-023-09861-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Under competitive business scenarios, project selection is a crucial process for ensuring that projects appropriately align with an organization’s goals, available resources, and relationships. This study proposes a novel hybrid decision support model that integrates the best–worst method (BWM) with the elimination and choice expressing reality (ELECTRE) method to solve project selection problems. The approach can be used to determine the weights of criteria by comparing two vectors and to provide the best result based on concordance and discordance analysis. An empirical study regarding the selection of strategic marketing information system projects is conducted to demonstrate the proposed methodology’s benefits and rationality. The findings show that using the BWM–ELECTRE approach systematically leads to solid decision-making results involving compromise rankings based on quantitative and qualitative data, including decision-makers’ preferences. This study contributes to the literature with a new methodology that consumes less time, provides high consistency, and enables subjectivity reduction in human-based judgments while providing helpful information to decision-makers in choosing the best project and/or outranking results among different relationships, resource constraints, or dynamic environments.</p>","PeriodicalId":47553,"journal":{"name":"Group Decision and Negotiation","volume":"67 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Group Decision and Negotiation","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10726-023-09861-x","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Under competitive business scenarios, project selection is a crucial process for ensuring that projects appropriately align with an organization’s goals, available resources, and relationships. This study proposes a novel hybrid decision support model that integrates the best–worst method (BWM) with the elimination and choice expressing reality (ELECTRE) method to solve project selection problems. The approach can be used to determine the weights of criteria by comparing two vectors and to provide the best result based on concordance and discordance analysis. An empirical study regarding the selection of strategic marketing information system projects is conducted to demonstrate the proposed methodology’s benefits and rationality. The findings show that using the BWM–ELECTRE approach systematically leads to solid decision-making results involving compromise rankings based on quantitative and qualitative data, including decision-makers’ preferences. This study contributes to the literature with a new methodology that consumes less time, provides high consistency, and enables subjectivity reduction in human-based judgments while providing helpful information to decision-makers in choosing the best project and/or outranking results among different relationships, resource constraints, or dynamic environments.
期刊介绍:
The idea underlying the journal, Group Decision and Negotiation, emerges from evolving, unifying approaches to group decision and negotiation processes. These processes are complex and self-organizing involving multiplayer, multicriteria, ill-structured, evolving, dynamic problems. Approaches include (1) computer group decision and negotiation support systems (GDNSS), (2) artificial intelligence and management science, (3) applied game theory, experiment and social choice, and (4) cognitive/behavioral sciences in group decision and negotiation. A number of research studies combine two or more of these fields. The journal provides a publication vehicle for theoretical and empirical research, and real-world applications and case studies. In defining the domain of group decision and negotiation, the term `group'' is interpreted to comprise all multiplayer contexts. Thus, organizational decision support systems providing organization-wide support are included. Group decision and negotiation refers to the whole process or flow of activities relevant to group decision and negotiation, not only to the final choice itself, e.g. scanning, communication and information sharing, problem definition (representation) and evolution, alternative generation and social-emotional interaction. Descriptive, normative and design viewpoints are of interest. Thus, Group Decision and Negotiation deals broadly with relation and coordination in group processes. Areas of application include intraorganizational coordination (as in operations management and integrated design, production, finance, marketing and distribution, e.g. as in new products and global coordination), computer supported collaborative work, labor-management negotiations, interorganizational negotiations, (business, government and nonprofits -- e.g. joint ventures), international (intercultural) negotiations, environmental negotiations, etc. The journal also covers developments of software f or group decision and negotiation.