Triggering a variety of Nash-equilibria in oligopolistic electricity markets

IF 2 3区 工程技术 Q2 ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Optimization and Engineering Pub Date : 2023-11-22 DOI:10.1007/s11081-023-09866-0
Mihály Dolányi, Kenneth Bruninx, Erik Delarue
{"title":"Triggering a variety of Nash-equilibria in oligopolistic electricity markets","authors":"Mihály Dolányi, Kenneth Bruninx, Erik Delarue","doi":"10.1007/s11081-023-09866-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Liberalized electricity markets promise a cost-efficient operation and expansion of power systems but may as well introduce opportunities for strategic gaming for price-making agents. Given the rapid transition of today’s energy systems, unconventional generation and consumption patterns are emerging, presenting new challenges for regulators and policymakers to prevent strategic behavior. The strategic offering of various price-making agents in oligopolistic electricity markets resembles a multi-leader-common-follower game. The decision problem of each agent can be modeled as a bi-level optimization problem, consisting of the strategic agent’s decision problem at the upper-level, and the market clearing at the lower-level. When modeling a multi-leader game, i.e., a set of bi-level optimization problems, the resulting equilibrium problem with equilibrium constraints poses several challenges. Real-life applicability or policy-oriented studies are challenged by the potential multiplicity of equilibria and the difficulty of exhaustively exploring this range of equilibria. In this paper, the range of equilibria is explored by using a novel simultaneous solution method. The proposed solution technique relies on applying Scholtes’ regularization before concatenating the strategic actor’s decision problems’ optimality conditions. Hence, the attained solutions are stationary points with high confidence. In a stylized example, different strategic agents, including an energy storage system, are modeled to capture the asymmetric opportunities they may face when exercising market power. Our analysis reveals that these models’ outcomes may span a broad range, impacting the derived economic metrics significantly.</p>","PeriodicalId":56141,"journal":{"name":"Optimization and Engineering","volume":"25 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Optimization and Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11081-023-09866-0","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Liberalized electricity markets promise a cost-efficient operation and expansion of power systems but may as well introduce opportunities for strategic gaming for price-making agents. Given the rapid transition of today’s energy systems, unconventional generation and consumption patterns are emerging, presenting new challenges for regulators and policymakers to prevent strategic behavior. The strategic offering of various price-making agents in oligopolistic electricity markets resembles a multi-leader-common-follower game. The decision problem of each agent can be modeled as a bi-level optimization problem, consisting of the strategic agent’s decision problem at the upper-level, and the market clearing at the lower-level. When modeling a multi-leader game, i.e., a set of bi-level optimization problems, the resulting equilibrium problem with equilibrium constraints poses several challenges. Real-life applicability or policy-oriented studies are challenged by the potential multiplicity of equilibria and the difficulty of exhaustively exploring this range of equilibria. In this paper, the range of equilibria is explored by using a novel simultaneous solution method. The proposed solution technique relies on applying Scholtes’ regularization before concatenating the strategic actor’s decision problems’ optimality conditions. Hence, the attained solutions are stationary points with high confidence. In a stylized example, different strategic agents, including an energy storage system, are modeled to capture the asymmetric opportunities they may face when exercising market power. Our analysis reveals that these models’ outcomes may span a broad range, impacting the derived economic metrics significantly.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在寡头垄断电力市场中引发各种纳什均衡
开放的电力市场保证了电力系统的低成本运作和扩展,但也可能为价格制定机构带来战略博弈的机会。鉴于当今能源系统的快速转型,非常规的发电和消费模式正在出现,这给监管机构和政策制定者提出了新的挑战,以防止战略行为。在寡头垄断的电力市场中,各种定价主体的战略供给类似于一个多领导者-共同追随者的博弈。每个agent的决策问题可以建模为双层优化问题,上层是战略agent的决策问题,下层是市场出清问题。当对多领导者博弈进行建模时,即一组双层优化问题,所得到的具有均衡约束的均衡问题提出了若干挑战。现实生活中的适用性或以政策为导向的研究受到平衡的潜在多样性和详尽探索这一平衡范围的困难的挑战。本文采用一种新的同时求解方法,探讨了平衡的范围。所提出的解决技术依赖于在连接战略参与者的决策问题的最优性条件之前应用Scholtes正则化。因此,得到的解是高置信度的平稳点。在一个程式化的例子中,对不同的战略代理(包括能源存储系统)进行建模,以捕捉它们在行使市场力量时可能面临的不对称机会。我们的分析表明,这些模型的结果可能跨越广泛的范围,显著影响推导出的经济指标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Optimization and Engineering
Optimization and Engineering 工程技术-工程:综合
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
14.30%
发文量
73
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Optimization and Engineering is a multidisciplinary journal; its primary goal is to promote the application of optimization methods in the general area of engineering sciences. We expect submissions to OPTE not only to make a significant optimization contribution but also to impact a specific engineering application. Topics of Interest: -Optimization: All methods and algorithms of mathematical optimization, including blackbox and derivative-free optimization, continuous optimization, discrete optimization, global optimization, linear and conic optimization, multiobjective optimization, PDE-constrained optimization & control, and stochastic optimization. Numerical and implementation issues, optimization software, benchmarking, and case studies. -Engineering Sciences: Aerospace engineering, biomedical engineering, chemical & process engineering, civil, environmental, & architectural engineering, electrical engineering, financial engineering, geosciences, healthcare engineering, industrial & systems engineering, mechanical engineering & MDO, and robotics.
期刊最新文献
Optimizing compressor rotor–stator assembly process to minimize clearance non-uniformity An integrated economic production quantity model with shortages considering energy utilization in production and warehousing Optimization of the composition of residential buildings in a renewable energy community based on monitored data Optimized dispatch and component sizing for a nuclear-multi-effect distillation integrated energy system using thermal energy storage The multi-class Stackelberg prediction game with least squares loss
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1