A five-year retrospective study on patterns of casuistry and insights on the current status of wildlife rescue and rehabilitation centers in Chile

IF 1.3 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q3 BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION Revista Chilena de Historia Natural Pub Date : 2019-09-09 DOI:10.1186/s40693-019-0086-0
Francisca Romero, Angelo Espinoza, Nicole Sallaberry-Pincheira, Constanza Napolitano
{"title":"A five-year retrospective study on patterns of casuistry and insights on the current status of wildlife rescue and rehabilitation centers in Chile","authors":"Francisca Romero, Angelo Espinoza, Nicole Sallaberry-Pincheira, Constanza Napolitano","doi":"10.1186/s40693-019-0086-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BackgroundHuman activities are permanently threatening wildlife. Wildlife Rescue and Rehabilitation Centers (WRRC) have served for the rescue, rehabilitation and reinsertion of affected and recovered animals.MethodsWe reviewed the casuistry of five wildlife rescue and rehabilitation centers in Chile over 5 years, and described the main causes of admission, most affected taxonomic groups and final outcomes of the admitted individuals, shedding light into general patterns and relevant factors currently affecting wildlife in Chile. To understand the current work and status of WRRC system in Chile, we also conducted a qualitative survey to WRRC personnel and Agricultural and Livestock Service (SAG) regional offices regarding their operation.ResultsA total of 3418 cases of animals admitted to WRRC were obtained; 95.3% corresponded to native species. Of native animal cases, 86.0% corresponded to birds, 12.3% were mammals and 1.7% reptiles. Trauma was the most frequently observed cause of admission in all three native fauna groups (35.8% in birds, 23.2% in mammals, 27.8% in reptiles).ConclusionsWRRC are a tool for conservation and education of wild animal species in Chile, however WRRC and SAG regional office personnel highlighted several deficiencies in the current system and suggested opportunities for improvement. The current WRRC system needs modernization and financial support from the Chilean state to fulfil their relevant mission.","PeriodicalId":21247,"journal":{"name":"Revista Chilena de Historia Natural","volume":"23 1","pages":"1-10"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2019-09-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"27","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Chilena de Historia Natural","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40693-019-0086-0","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 27

Abstract

BackgroundHuman activities are permanently threatening wildlife. Wildlife Rescue and Rehabilitation Centers (WRRC) have served for the rescue, rehabilitation and reinsertion of affected and recovered animals.MethodsWe reviewed the casuistry of five wildlife rescue and rehabilitation centers in Chile over 5 years, and described the main causes of admission, most affected taxonomic groups and final outcomes of the admitted individuals, shedding light into general patterns and relevant factors currently affecting wildlife in Chile. To understand the current work and status of WRRC system in Chile, we also conducted a qualitative survey to WRRC personnel and Agricultural and Livestock Service (SAG) regional offices regarding their operation.ResultsA total of 3418 cases of animals admitted to WRRC were obtained; 95.3% corresponded to native species. Of native animal cases, 86.0% corresponded to birds, 12.3% were mammals and 1.7% reptiles. Trauma was the most frequently observed cause of admission in all three native fauna groups (35.8% in birds, 23.2% in mammals, 27.8% in reptiles).ConclusionsWRRC are a tool for conservation and education of wild animal species in Chile, however WRRC and SAG regional office personnel highlighted several deficiencies in the current system and suggested opportunities for improvement. The current WRRC system needs modernization and financial support from the Chilean state to fulfil their relevant mission.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
一项关于智利野生动物救援和康复中心现状的诡辩模式和见解的五年回顾性研究
人类活动正在永久地威胁着野生动物。野生动物救援和康复中心(WRRC)为受感染和康复的动物提供救援、康复和重新融入社会的服务。方法回顾智利5个野生动物救助和康复中心近5年来的发病情况,描述入院个体的主要原因、最受影响的分类类群和最终结果,揭示目前智利野生动物的一般模式和相关因素。为了了解智利WRRC系统的当前工作和现状,我们还对WRRC人员和农牧服务局(SAG)区域办事处进行了定性调查。结果共获得收治动物3418例;95.3%为本地种。其中,鸟类占86.0%,哺乳动物占12.3%,爬行动物占1.7%。外伤是三种本地动物群中最常见的入院原因(鸟类为35.8%,哺乳动物为23.2%,爬行动物为27.8%)。结论WRRC是智利野生动物物种保护和教育的一个工具,但WRRC和SAG区域办事处的工作人员指出了目前系统中的一些不足之处,并提出了改进的机会。目前的WRRC系统需要现代化和智利国家的财政支持,以完成其相关使命。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Revista Chilena de Historia Natural
Revista Chilena de Historia Natural 环境科学-生态学
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
18.20%
发文量
9
审稿时长
>36 weeks
期刊介绍: Revista Chilena de Historia Natural (RCHN) publishes original research dealing with past and present phenomena from organismic to higher levels of biological organization, considering both empirical and theoretical studies on all kinds of taxa and environments. The major areas covered by RCHN are: botany and zoology; physiological and behavioral ecology; population biology; community and ecosystem ecology; systematics, biogeography and evolution.
期刊最新文献
Correction: Unveiling emerging interdisciplinary research challenges in the highly threatened sclerophyllous forests of central Chile Genomics resources for the Rapa Nui (Eastern Island) spiny lobster Panulirus pascuensis (Crustacea: Decapoda: Achelata) Where is dinner? The spatiality of the trophic niche of terrestrial mammalian carnivores in Chile, a systematization for their conservation The iconographic evolution of Patagonian and Fuegian canids Vascular flora of Punta Arenas city: comparative analysis of composition, life forms, and biogeographic origins
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1