Less is not more: 401(k) plan information and retirement planning choices

IF 1 4区 经济学 Q3 BUSINESS, FINANCE Journal of Pension Economics & Finance Pub Date : 2021-12-07 DOI:10.1017/s1474747221000445
Eric Cardella, Charlene M. Kalenkoski, Michael Parent
{"title":"Less is not more: 401(k) plan information and retirement planning choices","authors":"Eric Cardella, Charlene M. Kalenkoski, Michael Parent","doi":"10.1017/s1474747221000445","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This paper presents the results of a choice experiment that is designed to examine whether changing how plan information is presented affects planned retirement-savings behavior. The main hypothesis is that providing plan information in a more concise format with helpful recommendations, rather than providing lengthy and detailed information, will alter retirement-planning choices. The specific choices examined include: whether to enroll, how much to contribute, and how to structure (broadly) the asset allocation. The choice experiment is conducted on three different samples: (i) a Qualtrics panel of new employees, (ii) a Qualtrics panel of job seekers, and (iii) a sample of business-school students. Our results suggest that, controlling for demographic and other factors, our main hypothesis was not supported by the data in any of the samples. Thus, the data cast some doubt on the notion that simplifying and condensing the retirement-plan information presented to employees will result in vastly different retirement-planning choices.</p>","PeriodicalId":46635,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pension Economics & Finance","volume":"3 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pension Economics & Finance","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/s1474747221000445","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

This paper presents the results of a choice experiment that is designed to examine whether changing how plan information is presented affects planned retirement-savings behavior. The main hypothesis is that providing plan information in a more concise format with helpful recommendations, rather than providing lengthy and detailed information, will alter retirement-planning choices. The specific choices examined include: whether to enroll, how much to contribute, and how to structure (broadly) the asset allocation. The choice experiment is conducted on three different samples: (i) a Qualtrics panel of new employees, (ii) a Qualtrics panel of job seekers, and (iii) a sample of business-school students. Our results suggest that, controlling for demographic and other factors, our main hypothesis was not supported by the data in any of the samples. Thus, the data cast some doubt on the notion that simplifying and condensing the retirement-plan information presented to employees will result in vastly different retirement-planning choices.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
少不等于多:401(k)计划信息和退休计划选择
本文提出了一个选择实验的结果,该实验旨在检验改变计划信息的呈现方式是否会影响计划退休储蓄行为。主要的假设是,以更简洁的形式提供有帮助的建议的计划信息,而不是提供冗长和详细的信息,将改变退休计划的选择。研究的具体选择包括:是否注册,贡献多少,以及如何(广泛地)构建资产配置。选择实验在三个不同的样本上进行:(i) Qualtrics小组的新员工,(ii) Qualtrics小组的求职者,以及(iii)商学院学生的样本。我们的结果表明,在控制人口统计和其他因素后,我们的主要假设没有得到任何样本数据的支持。因此,这些数据对简化和压缩提供给员工的退休计划信息将导致截然不同的退休计划选择这一概念提出了一些质疑。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
8.30%
发文量
29
期刊最新文献
Social security and retirement around the world: lessons from a long-term collaboration What drives the growth of an open pension fund? A building block approach to retirement income design The actuarial sources of the rise in unfunded liabilities in America's defined benefit plans in the 21st century Introduction to the 20th Anniversary Special Issue of the Journal of Pension Economics and Finance
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1