Partial de-annuitization of public pensions vs. retirement age differentiation: Which is best to account for longevity differences?

IF 1 4区 经济学 Q3 BUSINESS, FINANCE Journal of Pension Economics & Finance Pub Date : 2022-12-09 DOI:10.1017/s1474747222000257
Vincent Vandenberghe
{"title":"Partial de-annuitization of public pensions vs. retirement age differentiation: Which is best to account for longevity differences?","authors":"Vincent Vandenberghe","doi":"10.1017/s1474747222000257","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Extensive research by demographers and economists has shown that longevity differs across socio-economic status (SES), with low-educated or low-income people living, on average, shorter lives than their better-endowed and wealthier peers. Therefore, a pension system with a unique retirement age is a priori problematic. The usual policy recommendation to address this problem is to differentiate the retirement age by SES. This paper explores the relative merits of partial de-annuitization of public pensions as a way of addressing the (imperfectly assessed) inequality of longevity.","PeriodicalId":46635,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pension Economics & Finance","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pension Economics & Finance","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/s1474747222000257","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Extensive research by demographers and economists has shown that longevity differs across socio-economic status (SES), with low-educated or low-income people living, on average, shorter lives than their better-endowed and wealthier peers. Therefore, a pension system with a unique retirement age is a priori problematic. The usual policy recommendation to address this problem is to differentiate the retirement age by SES. This paper explores the relative merits of partial de-annuitization of public pensions as a way of addressing the (imperfectly assessed) inequality of longevity.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
公共养老金的部分去年化vs.退休年龄差异:哪一个最能解释寿命差异?
人口统计学家和经济学家的广泛研究表明,不同社会经济地位(SES)的人的寿命不同,受教育程度低或收入低的人的平均寿命比条件更好、更富有的同龄人短。因此,单独规定退休年龄的养老金制度存在先天问题。解决这一问题的通常政策建议是按社会经济地位区分退休年龄。本文探讨了公共养老金部分去年化作为解决(不完全评估的)寿命不平等的一种方式的相对优点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
8.30%
发文量
29
期刊最新文献
Social security and retirement around the world: lessons from a long-term collaboration What drives the growth of an open pension fund? A building block approach to retirement income design The actuarial sources of the rise in unfunded liabilities in America's defined benefit plans in the 21st century Introduction to the 20th Anniversary Special Issue of the Journal of Pension Economics and Finance
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1