From Allies of “Conversion Therapy” to Accomplices of Justice: Invited Concluding Comment to the C&BP Special Series

IF 2.9 3区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL Cognitive and Behavioral Practice Pub Date : 2024-02-01 DOI:10.1016/j.cbpra.2023.09.004
Craig Rodriguez-Seijas, Lorenzo Lorenzo-Luaces
{"title":"From Allies of “Conversion Therapy” to Accomplices of Justice: Invited Concluding Comment to the C&BP Special Series","authors":"Craig Rodriguez-Seijas,&nbsp;Lorenzo Lorenzo-Luaces","doi":"10.1016/j.cbpra.2023.09.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This special feature of Cognitive and Behavioral Practice serves to remind psychological scientists and other mental health clinicians of the importance of understanding our responsibilities in the field with specific reference to sexual orientation and gender identity “conversion therapy” efforts: from considering our ethical responsibilities in our practice (Davison) to understanding the widespread iatrogenic impacts of “conversion therapy” practice in all its subtleties (Anderson et al.), from staying abreast of the contemporary anti-LGBTQ+ talking points (Haldeman) to understanding how this rhetoric targets specific subpopulations in the U.S. currently (Hope &amp; Puckett). We conclude this special series by reminding the reader that structures within our institutions and day-to-day functioning uphold and foster an unethical and iatrogenic practice. We point out the need to be alert. Clinical psychological science is not value-free. Pretending that it is serves the obfuscation of scientific findings and equips scholars who hold vested interests in seeing the dangerous practice of “conversion therapy” legitimized and disseminated in a larger scale.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":51511,"journal":{"name":"Cognitive and Behavioral Practice","volume":"31 1","pages":"Pages 26-30"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cognitive and Behavioral Practice","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1077722923000913","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This special feature of Cognitive and Behavioral Practice serves to remind psychological scientists and other mental health clinicians of the importance of understanding our responsibilities in the field with specific reference to sexual orientation and gender identity “conversion therapy” efforts: from considering our ethical responsibilities in our practice (Davison) to understanding the widespread iatrogenic impacts of “conversion therapy” practice in all its subtleties (Anderson et al.), from staying abreast of the contemporary anti-LGBTQ+ talking points (Haldeman) to understanding how this rhetoric targets specific subpopulations in the U.S. currently (Hope & Puckett). We conclude this special series by reminding the reader that structures within our institutions and day-to-day functioning uphold and foster an unethical and iatrogenic practice. We point out the need to be alert. Clinical psychological science is not value-free. Pretending that it is serves the obfuscation of scientific findings and equips scholars who hold vested interests in seeing the dangerous practice of “conversion therapy” legitimized and disseminated in a larger scale.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
从“转化治疗”的同盟者到正义的共犯:C&BP专题系列特邀结束语
《认知与行为实践》的这一特点提醒心理科学家和其他心理健康临床医生,了解我们在性取向和性别认同“转化治疗”方面的责任的重要性:从考虑我们在实践中的道德责任(戴维森)到理解“转化治疗”实践的所有微妙之处的广泛医源性影响(安德森等人),从与当代反lgbtq +谈话要点保持同步(霍尔德曼)到理解这种修辞如何针对美国目前的特定亚群体(霍普&安培;帕克特)。我们通过提醒读者,我们的机构和日常运作的结构维护和促进不道德和医源性的做法来结束这个特别系列。我们指出需要保持警惕。临床心理科学不是没有价值的。假装它是为了混淆科学发现,并使那些拥有既得利益的学者看到危险的“转化治疗”实践合法化并在更大范围内传播。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Cognitive and Behavioral Practice
Cognitive and Behavioral Practice PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL-
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
3.40%
发文量
118
审稿时长
84 days
期刊介绍: Cognitive and Behavioral Practice is a quarterly international journal that serves an enduring resource for empirically informed methods of clinical practice. Its mission is to bridge the gap between published research and the actual clinical practice of cognitive behavior therapy. Cognitive and Behavioral Practice publishes clinically rich accounts of innovative assessment and diagnostic and therapeutic procedures that are clearly grounded in empirical research. A focus on application and implementation of procedures is maintained.
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Mapping Dialectical Behavior Therapy Skills to Clinical Domains Implicated in Contemporary Addiction Research: A Conceptual Synthesis and Promise for Precision Medicine TEAM-CBT for Adolescents and Young Adults With Depression and Anxiety: Testing Short-Term Impact and Within-Session Change Narrative Exposure Therapy for a Traumatic Birth Experience With the Non-Birthing Parent: A Single Case Study Disorders in Disguise: Proposed Clinical Competencies in Eating Disorders for All Child and Adolescent Mental Health Providers
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1