Separating Vertical from Horizontal Differentiation

IF 0.8 4区 经济学 Q3 ECONOMICS Review of Industrial Organization Pub Date : 2023-11-17 DOI:10.1007/s11151-023-09924-y
Ricardo D. Brito, Eduardo Correia de Souza, Rodrigo Moita
{"title":"Separating Vertical from Horizontal Differentiation","authors":"Ricardo D. Brito, Eduardo Correia de Souza, Rodrigo Moita","doi":"10.1007/s11151-023-09924-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>We demonstrate that R&amp;D intensity is an appropriate measure of vertical differentiation, while the Rauch (J Int Econ 48:7–35, 1999) classification mainly captures horizontal differentiation. Product market characteristics vary considerably across R&amp;D intensity-based “technology levels” of the OECD-STI taxonomy, as well as across categories of the Rauch classification. Both high technology and differentiated products display lower price elasticity of demand and longer quality ladders than do low technology and homogeneous products. However, variety proliferation decreases with the technology level and increases with the Rauch category, while price dispersion increases with technology but not with the Rauch. Additionally, Rauch categories do not differ in factor intensities, while higher tech industries are more capital intensive than lower tech ones.</p>","PeriodicalId":47454,"journal":{"name":"Review of Industrial Organization","volume":"292 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Review of Industrial Organization","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11151-023-09924-y","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We demonstrate that R&D intensity is an appropriate measure of vertical differentiation, while the Rauch (J Int Econ 48:7–35, 1999) classification mainly captures horizontal differentiation. Product market characteristics vary considerably across R&D intensity-based “technology levels” of the OECD-STI taxonomy, as well as across categories of the Rauch classification. Both high technology and differentiated products display lower price elasticity of demand and longer quality ladders than do low technology and homogeneous products. However, variety proliferation decreases with the technology level and increases with the Rauch category, while price dispersion increases with technology but not with the Rauch. Additionally, Rauch categories do not differ in factor intensities, while higher tech industries are more capital intensive than lower tech ones.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
从水平分化中分离垂直分化
我们证明研发强度是垂直分化的适当衡量标准,而Rauch (J Int Econ 48:7-35, 1999)分类主要捕捉水平分化。产品市场特征在OECD-STI分类中基于研发强度的“技术水平”之间以及Rauch分类的不同类别之间差异很大。高技术和差异化产品都比低技术和同质化产品表现出更低的需求价格弹性和更长的质量阶梯。品种扩散随技术水平而降低,随劳赫类别而增加;价格分散随技术水平而增加,但不随劳赫类别而增加。此外,Rauch分类在要素强度上没有差异,而高技术产业比低技术产业的资本密集程度更高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
9.10%
发文量
35
期刊介绍: New Online Manuscript Submission System The Review of Industrial Organization publishes research papers on all aspects of industrial organization, broadly defined. A main focus is on competition and monopoly, in their many forms and processes and their effects on efficiency, innovation, and social conditions. Topics may range from the internal organization of enterprises to wide international comparisons. The Review is also increasing its interest in papers on public policies such as antitrust, regulation, deregulation, public enterprise, and privatization. Papers may deal with any economic sectors and any developed economies. The Review continues its primary interest in ideas that can be verified by econometric evidence, case studies, or other real conditions. But the Review also seeks papers that advance significant theories of industrial organization and policy. Papers using abstract techniques and econometric tests should present the methods and analysis in plain enough English so that non-specialist readers can evaluate the content. The Review welcomes submissions from any source, and the Editors will make every effort to have papers reviewed quickly and to give prompt decisions. The Editors will also seek to arrange symposia on specific topics, and they are open to proposals for grouped papers. They also welcome shorter notes and commentaries on topics of interest to the profession. Officially cited as: Rev Ind Organ
期刊最新文献
A Transactions Cost Analysis of the Welfare and Output Effects of Rebates and Non-Linear Pricing Cartel Damages Claims, Passing-On, and Passing-Back Location, Location, Quality:The Fixed Differentiation Principle The Coase Conjecture When the Monopolist and Customers have Different Discount Rates Heterogeneous Tax-Cut Pass-Through and Market Structure
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1