Why do young adults coreside with their parents?

IF 2 3区 经济学 Q2 BUSINESS, FINANCE Real Estate Economics Pub Date : 2023-11-27 DOI:10.1111/1540-6229.12467
Arthur Acolin, Desen Lin, Susan M. Wachter
{"title":"Why do young adults coreside with their parents?","authors":"Arthur Acolin, Desen Lin, Susan M. Wachter","doi":"10.1111/1540-6229.12467","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Nearly one in every two adults aged 18–29 currently lives with their parents, compared to slightly more than one in four in 1960. The literature focuses on changing labor market conditions and marriage–childbearing delays to account for this shift. Using a Blinder–Oaxaca procedure, we identify a role for housing affordability, measured by market-level median housing rent or price to median household income ratios, as an additional factor in the increase in coresidency since but not before 2000. We endogenize the marriage–childbearing decision with a Heckman selection model and attribute up to a quarter of the observed 9-percentage-point increase in the coresidence share between 2000 and 2021 to a decrease in housing affordability. We find a nonlinear relationship between affordability and coresidence with the relationship strongest in the least affordable metros where affordability constraints might be more binding. Overall, these results show changes in market-level housing affordability are associated with the increase in young adult coresidence over the first two decades of the 21st century.","PeriodicalId":47731,"journal":{"name":"Real Estate Economics","volume":"56 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Real Estate Economics","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-6229.12467","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Nearly one in every two adults aged 18–29 currently lives with their parents, compared to slightly more than one in four in 1960. The literature focuses on changing labor market conditions and marriage–childbearing delays to account for this shift. Using a Blinder–Oaxaca procedure, we identify a role for housing affordability, measured by market-level median housing rent or price to median household income ratios, as an additional factor in the increase in coresidency since but not before 2000. We endogenize the marriage–childbearing decision with a Heckman selection model and attribute up to a quarter of the observed 9-percentage-point increase in the coresidence share between 2000 and 2021 to a decrease in housing affordability. We find a nonlinear relationship between affordability and coresidence with the relationship strongest in the least affordable metros where affordability constraints might be more binding. Overall, these results show changes in market-level housing affordability are associated with the increase in young adult coresidence over the first two decades of the 21st century.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
为什么年轻人要和父母住在一起?
目前,在18至29岁的成年人中,几乎每两个人中就有一个与父母同住,而在1960年,这一比例略高于四分之一。文献着重于劳动力市场条件的变化和婚育延迟来解释这种转变。使用Blinder-Oaxaca程序,我们确定了住房负担能力的作用,通过市场水平住房租金中位数或价格与家庭收入中位数的比率来衡量,这是自2000年以来(但不是在2000年之前)同居人数增加的另一个因素。我们用赫克曼选择模型(Heckman selection model)将婚姻-生育决策内化,并将2000年至2021年间观察到的同居比例增长9个百分点的四分之一归因于住房负担能力的下降。我们发现,可负担性与同居之间存在非线性关系,在可负担性约束可能更具约束力的最难以负担的地铁中,这种关系最为强烈。总体而言,这些结果表明,在21世纪的前20年,市场住房负担能力的变化与年轻人共同居住的增加有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
13.60%
发文量
44
期刊介绍: As the official journal of the American Real Estate and Urban Economics Association, Real Estate Economics is the premier journal on real estate topics. Since 1973, Real Estate Economics has been facilitating communication among academic researchers and industry professionals and improving the analysis of real estate decisions. Articles span a wide range of issues, from tax rules to brokers" commissions to corporate real estate including housing and urban economics, and the financial economics of real estate development and investment.
期刊最新文献
Do immigrants equally benefit from rent control? Zero‐price effect and consumer welfare: Evidence from online classified real estate service Housing sales and construction responses to COVID‐19: Evidence from shelter‐in‐place and eviction moratoria in the United States Property management technology adoption in the short‐term housing rental market “Connect” me! Social networking in commercial real estate
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1