{"title":"Inference of Sample Complier Average Causal Effects in Completely Randomized Experiments","authors":"Zhen Zhong, Per Johansson, Junni L. Zhang","doi":"arxiv-2311.17476","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In randomized experiments with non-compliance scholars have argued that the\ncomplier average causal effect (CACE) ought to be the main causal estimand. The\nliterature on inference of the complier average treatment effect (CACE) has\nfocused on inference about the population CACE. However, in general individuals\nin the experiments are volunteers. This means that there is a risk that\nindividuals partaking in a given experiment differ in important ways from a\npopulation of interest. It is thus of interest to focus on the sample at hand\nand have easy to use and correct procedures for inference about the sample\nCACE. We consider a more general setting than in the previous literature and\nconstruct a confidence interval based on the Wald estimator in the form of a\nfinite closed interval that is familiar to practitioners. Furthermore, with the\naccess of pre-treatment covariates, we propose a new regression adjustment\nestimator and associated methods for constructing confidence intervals. Finite\nsample performance of the methods is examined through a Monte Carlo simulation\nand the methods are used in an application to a job training experiment.","PeriodicalId":501330,"journal":{"name":"arXiv - MATH - Statistics Theory","volume":"82 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"arXiv - MATH - Statistics Theory","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/arxiv-2311.17476","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
In randomized experiments with non-compliance scholars have argued that the
complier average causal effect (CACE) ought to be the main causal estimand. The
literature on inference of the complier average treatment effect (CACE) has
focused on inference about the population CACE. However, in general individuals
in the experiments are volunteers. This means that there is a risk that
individuals partaking in a given experiment differ in important ways from a
population of interest. It is thus of interest to focus on the sample at hand
and have easy to use and correct procedures for inference about the sample
CACE. We consider a more general setting than in the previous literature and
construct a confidence interval based on the Wald estimator in the form of a
finite closed interval that is familiar to practitioners. Furthermore, with the
access of pre-treatment covariates, we propose a new regression adjustment
estimator and associated methods for constructing confidence intervals. Finite
sample performance of the methods is examined through a Monte Carlo simulation
and the methods are used in an application to a job training experiment.