An Information-Theoretic Analog of the Twin Paradox

Mladen Kovačević, Iosif Pinelis, Marios Kountouris
{"title":"An Information-Theoretic Analog of the Twin Paradox","authors":"Mladen Kovačević, Iosif Pinelis, Marios Kountouris","doi":"arxiv-2309.11862","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We revisit the familiar scenario involving two parties in relative motion, in\nwhich Alice stays at rest while Bob goes on a journey at speed $ \\beta c $\nalong an arbitrary trajectory and reunites with Alice after a certain period of\ntime. It is a well-known consequence of special relativity that the time that\npasses until they meet again is different for the two parties and is shorter in\nBob's frame by a factor of $ \\sqrt{1-\\beta^2} $. We investigate how this\nasymmetry manifests from an information-theoretic viewpoint. Assuming that\nAlice and Bob transmit signals of equal average power to each other during the\nwhole journey, and that additive white Gaussian noise is present on both sides,\nwe show that the maximum number of bits per second that Alice can transmit\nreliably to Bob is always higher than the one Bob can transmit to Alice.\nEquivalently, the energy per bit invested by Alice is lower than that invested\nby Bob, meaning that the traveler is less efficient from the communication\nperspective, as conjectured by Jarett and Cover.","PeriodicalId":501348,"journal":{"name":"arXiv - PHYS - Popular Physics","volume":"600 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"arXiv - PHYS - Popular Physics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/arxiv-2309.11862","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We revisit the familiar scenario involving two parties in relative motion, in which Alice stays at rest while Bob goes on a journey at speed $ \beta c $ along an arbitrary trajectory and reunites with Alice after a certain period of time. It is a well-known consequence of special relativity that the time that passes until they meet again is different for the two parties and is shorter in Bob's frame by a factor of $ \sqrt{1-\beta^2} $. We investigate how this asymmetry manifests from an information-theoretic viewpoint. Assuming that Alice and Bob transmit signals of equal average power to each other during the whole journey, and that additive white Gaussian noise is present on both sides, we show that the maximum number of bits per second that Alice can transmit reliably to Bob is always higher than the one Bob can transmit to Alice. Equivalently, the energy per bit invested by Alice is lower than that invested by Bob, meaning that the traveler is less efficient from the communication perspective, as conjectured by Jarett and Cover.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
双生悖论的信息论类比
我们重新审视熟悉的两方相对运动的场景,其中Alice保持静止,而Bob沿着任意轨迹以$ \beta c $的速度旅行,并在一段时间后与Alice重聚。狭义相对论的一个众所周知的结论是,在他们再次相遇之前经过的时间对双方来说是不同的,并且在鲍勃的框架中缩短了$ \sqrt{1-\beta^2} $倍。我们从信息论的角度研究这种不对称是如何表现的。假设Alice和Bob在整个旅程中以相等的平均功率相互传输信号,并且两边都存在加性高斯白噪声,我们证明了Alice可以可靠地传输给Bob的每秒最大比特数总是高于Bob可以传输给Alice的比特数。同样,正如贾勒特和盖伊推测的那样,爱丽丝每比特投入的能量比鲍勃投入的能量要低,这意味着从通信的角度来看,旅行者的效率更低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Did WISE detect Dyson Spheres/Structures around Gaia-2MASS-selected stars? The Ancient Egyptian Cosmological Vignette: First Visual Evidence of the Milky Way and Trends in Coffin Depictions of the Sky Goddess Nut The hardest-hit home run? Projections of Earth's technosphere. I. Scenario modeling, worldbuilding, and overview of remotely detectable technosignatures Quantum Technologies and AI -- Interview with Tommaso Calarco
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1