A thematic analysis of code of ethics disclosures in SEC 8-K Item 5.05

IF 3.6 2区 哲学 Q2 BUSINESS Business Ethics the Environment & Responsibility Pub Date : 2023-11-30 DOI:10.1111/beer.12633
Charles P. Cullinan, Richard Holowczak, David Louton, Hakan Saraoglu
{"title":"A thematic analysis of code of ethics disclosures in SEC 8-K Item 5.05","authors":"Charles P. Cullinan,&nbsp;Richard Holowczak,&nbsp;David Louton,&nbsp;Hakan Saraoglu","doi":"10.1111/beer.12633","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The Securities and Exchange Commission requires the disclosure of changes to or waivers of corporate codes of ethics. Because the nature of amendments or waivers can vary, we expect the text of Item 5.05 to include different topics within different filings. We examine the population of these disclosures in Item 5.05 8-K filings from 2004 to 2020. While previous studies utilized small samples (fewer than 50 observations) to examine limited aspects of these filings, we use the population of these filings from 2004 to 2020 (2121 8-K filings) to elucidate the nature and details of the disclosures. We assess whether Latent Dirichlet Allocation—a computational linguistics technique—can help discern the underlying topics represented in filings. While the Securities and Exchange Commission identifies two topics—amendments and waivers—the Latent Dirichlet Allocation analysis reveals four topics (three related to amendments): (1) code updates and clarifications; (2) combining codes of conduct for all officers and employees, or splitting codes to include a code directly applicable to senior financial officers; (3) codes of ethics waivers; and (4) substantive code changes. The overall trend is for fewer 8-Ks to be filed in recent years, with updates and clarifications becoming the predominant filing type. Our results further indicate that Item 5.05s related to updates and clarifications, and those related to combined or split codes, use fewer words and are more easily readable than those disclosing waivers or material code changes. Although we find no significant price reaction to Item 5.05 8-K filings, we find significant trading volume and volatility reactions, suggesting that these disclosures could give rise to differences in opinion among investors, which is consistent with the US Senate's assertion that these disclosures are of interest to investors.</p>","PeriodicalId":29886,"journal":{"name":"Business Ethics the Environment & Responsibility","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Business Ethics the Environment & Responsibility","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/beer.12633","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The Securities and Exchange Commission requires the disclosure of changes to or waivers of corporate codes of ethics. Because the nature of amendments or waivers can vary, we expect the text of Item 5.05 to include different topics within different filings. We examine the population of these disclosures in Item 5.05 8-K filings from 2004 to 2020. While previous studies utilized small samples (fewer than 50 observations) to examine limited aspects of these filings, we use the population of these filings from 2004 to 2020 (2121 8-K filings) to elucidate the nature and details of the disclosures. We assess whether Latent Dirichlet Allocation—a computational linguistics technique—can help discern the underlying topics represented in filings. While the Securities and Exchange Commission identifies two topics—amendments and waivers—the Latent Dirichlet Allocation analysis reveals four topics (three related to amendments): (1) code updates and clarifications; (2) combining codes of conduct for all officers and employees, or splitting codes to include a code directly applicable to senior financial officers; (3) codes of ethics waivers; and (4) substantive code changes. The overall trend is for fewer 8-Ks to be filed in recent years, with updates and clarifications becoming the predominant filing type. Our results further indicate that Item 5.05s related to updates and clarifications, and those related to combined or split codes, use fewer words and are more easily readable than those disclosing waivers or material code changes. Although we find no significant price reaction to Item 5.05 8-K filings, we find significant trading volume and volatility reactions, suggesting that these disclosures could give rise to differences in opinion among investors, which is consistent with the US Senate's assertion that these disclosures are of interest to investors.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
SEC 8-K条款5.05中道德准则披露的专题分析
美国证券交易委员会(Securities and Exchange Commission)要求披露公司道德准则的变更或放弃。由于修改或放弃的性质可能有所不同,我们希望第5.05项的文本在不同的文件中包含不同的主题。我们研究了2004年至2020年8-K文件中5.05项中这些披露的数量。虽然以前的研究使用小样本(少于50个观察值)来检查这些文件的有限方面,但我们使用2004年至2020年这些文件的总体(2121份8-K文件)来阐明披露的性质和细节。我们评估潜在狄利克雷分配-一种计算语言学技术-是否可以帮助识别文件中所代表的潜在主题。虽然证券交易委员会确定了两个主题-修正案和豁免-潜在狄利克雷分配分析揭示了四个主题(其中三个与修正案相关):(1)代码更新和澄清;(2)合并适用于所有管理人员和员工的行为准则,或拆分准则,纳入直接适用于高级财务人员的准则;(3)道德准则豁免;(4)实质性代码变更。总体趋势是近年来提交的8- k较少,更新和澄清成为主要的文件类型。我们的研究结果进一步表明,与披露免责或重大代码更改的内容相比,与更新和澄清相关的5.05条款以及与合并或拆分代码相关的条款使用的单词更少,更易于阅读。虽然我们没有发现项目5.05 8-K文件有显著的价格反应,但我们发现显著的交易量和波动性反应,这表明这些披露可能会引起投资者之间的意见分歧,这与美国参议院的断言一致,即这些披露是投资者感兴趣的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
19.00%
发文量
86
期刊最新文献
Issue Information Issue Information Issue Information Reimagining the sustainable consumer: Why social representations of sustainable consumption matter Consultants as discreet corporate change agents for sustainability: Transforming organizations from the outside-in
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1