The interdependence between the choice of fixed-term professional workers and the control environment

IF 3.6 2区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS, FINANCE Accounting Organizations and Society Pub Date : 2023-12-01 DOI:10.1016/j.aos.2023.101525
Sujay Nair, Margaret A. Abernethy, Yile (Anson) Jiang, Anne M. Lillis
{"title":"The interdependence between the choice of fixed-term professional workers and the control environment","authors":"Sujay Nair, Margaret A. Abernethy, Yile (Anson) Jiang, Anne M. Lillis","doi":"10.1016/j.aos.2023.101525","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Many organizations have professional employees on fixed-term and ongoing employment contracts. While hiring employees on fixed-term contracts offers organizations operational flexibility and other benefits, it also brings about challenges in the form of relatively lower goal alignment and ability of these employees, thus creating the need for management controls. At the same time, given the costs and constraints of designing and implementing a control system, we expect that the planned use of fixed-term workers would be affected by the type of control environment that organizations are willing or able to create. Hence, this study investigates whether an organization's choice of its control environment and its use of fixed-term professional employees are interdependent (i.e., made jointly). Using surveys from different sources and archival data from the education sector, we find that some types of controls (i.e., action controls and organizational culture) and the organization's choice of using fixed-term employees are interdependent, while other controls (i.e., employee selection practices and results control) are independent of this choice. We also find that the interdependence between the choice of using fixed-term employees and the control environment is generally weaker when organizations use fixed-term contracts as an implicit screening mechanism for ongoing employment. Finally, in additional analysis, we find evidence that the interdependence between controls and the use of fixed-term employees is primarily due to concerns related to goal alignment rather than ability.</p>","PeriodicalId":48379,"journal":{"name":"Accounting Organizations and Society","volume":"11233 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accounting Organizations and Society","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2023.101525","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Many organizations have professional employees on fixed-term and ongoing employment contracts. While hiring employees on fixed-term contracts offers organizations operational flexibility and other benefits, it also brings about challenges in the form of relatively lower goal alignment and ability of these employees, thus creating the need for management controls. At the same time, given the costs and constraints of designing and implementing a control system, we expect that the planned use of fixed-term workers would be affected by the type of control environment that organizations are willing or able to create. Hence, this study investigates whether an organization's choice of its control environment and its use of fixed-term professional employees are interdependent (i.e., made jointly). Using surveys from different sources and archival data from the education sector, we find that some types of controls (i.e., action controls and organizational culture) and the organization's choice of using fixed-term employees are interdependent, while other controls (i.e., employee selection practices and results control) are independent of this choice. We also find that the interdependence between the choice of using fixed-term employees and the control environment is generally weaker when organizations use fixed-term contracts as an implicit screening mechanism for ongoing employment. Finally, in additional analysis, we find evidence that the interdependence between controls and the use of fixed-term employees is primarily due to concerns related to goal alignment rather than ability.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
固定期限专业工人的选择与控制环境之间的相互依存关系
许多组织都有定期和持续的雇佣合同的专业员工。虽然以固定期限合同雇佣员工为组织提供了运营灵活性和其他好处,但它也带来了挑战,这些员工的目标一致性和能力相对较低,因此需要管理控制。同时,考虑到设计和实施控制系统的成本和限制,我们预计计划使用固定期限工人将受到组织愿意或能够创建的控制环境类型的影响。因此,本研究考察组织对控制环境的选择与对固定期限专业员工的使用是否相互依赖(即共同做出)。利用来自不同来源的调查和教育部门的档案数据,我们发现某些类型的控制(即行动控制和组织文化)与组织使用固定期限员工的选择是相互依存的,而其他控制(即员工选择实践和结果控制)则独立于这种选择。我们还发现,当组织使用固定期限合同作为持续雇佣的隐性筛选机制时,使用固定期限员工的选择与控制环境之间的相互依存关系通常较弱。最后,在额外的分析中,我们发现证据表明,控制和使用固定期限员工之间的相互依赖主要是由于对目标一致性的关注,而不是能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
6.40%
发文量
38
期刊介绍: Accounting, Organizations & Society is a major international journal concerned with all aspects of the relationship between accounting and human behaviour, organizational structures and processes, and the changing social and political environment of the enterprise.
期刊最新文献
What you are versus what you do: The effect of noun-verb framing in earnings conference calls Seeking justice: Inequitable management compensation and employee whistleblowing The impact of descriptor identicalness on investors' judgements of managers’ opportunistic estimation choices Bringing morality back in: Accounting as moral interlocutor in reflective equilibrium processes Accounting and the shifting spheres: The economic, the public, the planet
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1