We investigate whether corporate political activity (CPA) benefited organizations during the distribution of COVID-19 stimulus funds. Using data on three mechanisms of political influence—lobbying expenditures, PAC contributions, and trade association lobbying—we analyze their impact on the most extensive stimulus package in U.S. history. Our findings reveal that publicly listed firms engaging in CPA were significantly more likely to receive COVID-19 stimulus support. Compared to firms without political activity, the odds of receiving government assistance were 91.5 % higher for firms that lobbied directly, 148.9 % higher for those contributing to PACs, and 112.1 % higher for those lobbying through trade associations. Financial returns on political influence were $0.11 per dollar spent on lobbying, $7.26 per dollar for PAC contributions, and $2.40 per dollar spent on trade association lobbying. Notably, returns were two to four times greater when CPA targeted specific policymakers or agencies responsible for fund disbursement. We find some evidence of an association between CPA and reduced stimulus efficiency or effectiveness at the agency level. Our study highlights the financial impact of political influence during stimulus events in times of global uncertainty, emphasizing the need for further research into its implications for policymaking.
扫码关注我们
求助内容:
应助结果提醒方式:
