{"title":"Polymorphism of Iron. Part 2. Paradoxes of Metallic Bonding Models","authors":"S. V. Davydov","doi":"10.3103/s096709122309005x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Abstract</h3><p>This study considers the main stages of the evolution of ideas about the kind of bonding in metals. The paradigm of chemical bonding in metals is based on the metallic bonding model known as the rigid atomic ion frame immersed in electron gas of free electrons or the electron gas model (P. Drude, H.A. Lorentz, Ch. Kittel, W. Hume-Rothery, and others). As an alternative to the official Drude–Lorentz electron gas theory, V.K. Grigorovich has proposed a modernized model and the metallic bonding theory based on the concept of the “multiple overlapping of outer valence orbitals”. V.Yu. Gankin has recently proposed a revolutionary metallic bonding model on electrostatic principles of “electron nuclear isomerization and electrostatic dynamic resonant interaction of valence electrons” or the atom-ion model. The models developed by Grigorovich and Gankin have largely evolved and deepened the idea about the kind of particle interaction among structural components of crystal metal lattice but have not gone beyond the basic limitations of the Drude–Lorentz model in terms of the antiphysical notion of electron gas of free electrons. None of the considered metallic bonding models explains the ionization degree of metal atoms, formation and effect of metallic bonds, and generation of threshold shear stresses in the crystal lattice of iron which are responsible for diffusionless transformation at polymorphous transformation temperature. Similarly, the theory of rigid ion frame immersed in electron gas fails to explain the phenomenon of mercury properties.</p>","PeriodicalId":21903,"journal":{"name":"Steel in Translation","volume":"17 8","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Steel in Translation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3103/s096709122309005x","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Materials Science","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This study considers the main stages of the evolution of ideas about the kind of bonding in metals. The paradigm of chemical bonding in metals is based on the metallic bonding model known as the rigid atomic ion frame immersed in electron gas of free electrons or the electron gas model (P. Drude, H.A. Lorentz, Ch. Kittel, W. Hume-Rothery, and others). As an alternative to the official Drude–Lorentz electron gas theory, V.K. Grigorovich has proposed a modernized model and the metallic bonding theory based on the concept of the “multiple overlapping of outer valence orbitals”. V.Yu. Gankin has recently proposed a revolutionary metallic bonding model on electrostatic principles of “electron nuclear isomerization and electrostatic dynamic resonant interaction of valence electrons” or the atom-ion model. The models developed by Grigorovich and Gankin have largely evolved and deepened the idea about the kind of particle interaction among structural components of crystal metal lattice but have not gone beyond the basic limitations of the Drude–Lorentz model in terms of the antiphysical notion of electron gas of free electrons. None of the considered metallic bonding models explains the ionization degree of metal atoms, formation and effect of metallic bonds, and generation of threshold shear stresses in the crystal lattice of iron which are responsible for diffusionless transformation at polymorphous transformation temperature. Similarly, the theory of rigid ion frame immersed in electron gas fails to explain the phenomenon of mercury properties.
期刊介绍：
Steel in Translation is a journal that represents a selection of translated articles from two Russian metallurgical journals: Stal’ and Izvestiya Vysshikh Uchebnykh Zavedenii. Chernaya Metallurgiya . Steel in Translation covers new developments in blast furnaces, steelmaking, rolled products, tubes, and metal manufacturing as well as unconventional methods of metallurgy and conservation of resources. Papers in materials science and relevant commercial applications make up a considerable portion of the journal’s contents. There is an emphasis on metal quality and cost effectiveness of metal production and treatment.
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
分享
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
扫码关注我们
