An exploratory investigation of performance criteria in managing and controlling new product development projects: Canadian SMEs' perspectives

IF 4.6 Q2 MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS ACS Applied Bio Materials Pub Date : 2023-11-17 DOI:10.1108/ijmpb-02-2023-0041
Caroline Blais, Raymond K. Agbodoh-Falschau
{"title":"An exploratory investigation of performance criteria in managing and controlling new product development projects: Canadian SMEs' perspectives","authors":"Caroline Blais, Raymond K. Agbodoh-Falschau","doi":"10.1108/ijmpb-02-2023-0041","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3>Purpose</h3>\n<p>This paper aims to understand and document evaluation criteria used in the new product development (NPD) process of small- and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) to support the management and control of their NPD projects.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Design/methodology/approach</h3>\n<p>This study combines exploratory and explanatory methodology (case studies) involving five Canadian small and medium enterprises (SMEs) that are successful in NPD. The authors conducted semi-structured interviews with nine selected managers and project managers to explore the process and evaluation criteria used to manage and control NPD projects.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Findings</h3>\n<p>The results highlight that cost, time and quality are key evaluation criteria used by SMEs to make decisions relative to the NPD project's success. Profitability, return on investment, expected sales and customer satisfaction are additional criteria used to evaluate NPD project's success. It has been also found that the SMEs did not consider sustainability issues in the criteria used as their focus are on the needs of stakeholders, mainly customers.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Research limitations/implications</h3>\n<p>Limitations: The evaluation criteria are extracted from a limited number of SMEs that have successfully carried out NPD projects and may therefore be influenced by some contextual factors. The results cannot be generalized to all SMEs or to all projects, as their characteristics may differ. Implications: This study offers a novel outlook on NPD process in SMEs, by documenting criteria related to constraints in project management. The integration of theory of constraints contributes to increasing theoretical knowledge about the management and control of NPD projects in SMEs. It provides insight into how project managers (and other decision makers) can increase the chances of project success by managing project constraints and criteria.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Practical implications</h3>\n<p>The evaluation criteria identified in this study can therefore be of use to SMEs managers and project leaders seeking to improve the management and control of their NPD projects. These criteria can help them better manage their limited resources and skills and allocate them to the most promising projects. They can also help them conduct their NPD process more efficiently to achieve the intended objectives, including the desired project profitability targets.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Originality/value</h3>\n<p>This paper offers new insight and practical implications about evaluation criteria within the stages and activities of the NPD process that needed to be considered by SMEs' managers involved in NPD projects.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->","PeriodicalId":2,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/ijmpb-02-2023-0041","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

This paper aims to understand and document evaluation criteria used in the new product development (NPD) process of small- and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) to support the management and control of their NPD projects.

Design/methodology/approach

This study combines exploratory and explanatory methodology (case studies) involving five Canadian small and medium enterprises (SMEs) that are successful in NPD. The authors conducted semi-structured interviews with nine selected managers and project managers to explore the process and evaluation criteria used to manage and control NPD projects.

Findings

The results highlight that cost, time and quality are key evaluation criteria used by SMEs to make decisions relative to the NPD project's success. Profitability, return on investment, expected sales and customer satisfaction are additional criteria used to evaluate NPD project's success. It has been also found that the SMEs did not consider sustainability issues in the criteria used as their focus are on the needs of stakeholders, mainly customers.

Research limitations/implications

Limitations: The evaluation criteria are extracted from a limited number of SMEs that have successfully carried out NPD projects and may therefore be influenced by some contextual factors. The results cannot be generalized to all SMEs or to all projects, as their characteristics may differ. Implications: This study offers a novel outlook on NPD process in SMEs, by documenting criteria related to constraints in project management. The integration of theory of constraints contributes to increasing theoretical knowledge about the management and control of NPD projects in SMEs. It provides insight into how project managers (and other decision makers) can increase the chances of project success by managing project constraints and criteria.

Practical implications

The evaluation criteria identified in this study can therefore be of use to SMEs managers and project leaders seeking to improve the management and control of their NPD projects. These criteria can help them better manage their limited resources and skills and allocate them to the most promising projects. They can also help them conduct their NPD process more efficiently to achieve the intended objectives, including the desired project profitability targets.

Originality/value

This paper offers new insight and practical implications about evaluation criteria within the stages and activities of the NPD process that needed to be considered by SMEs' managers involved in NPD projects.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
管理和控制新产品开发项目的绩效标准的探索性调查:加拿大中小企业的观点
本文旨在了解并记录中小企业新产品开发(NPD)过程中使用的评价标准,以支持其新产品开发项目的管理和控制。设计/方法/方法本研究结合了探索性和解释性方法(案例研究),涉及五家在新产品开发方面取得成功的加拿大中小企业。作者对9位选定的经理和项目经理进行了半结构化访谈,以探讨用于管理和控制NPD项目的流程和评估标准。研究结果表明,成本、时间和质量是中小企业制定新产品开发项目成功与否的关键评估标准。盈利能力、投资回报率、预期销售额和客户满意度是评估新产品开发项目成功与否的附加标准。研究还发现,中小企业在使用的标准中没有考虑可持续性问题,因为他们关注的是利益相关者(主要是客户)的需求。研究局限性/启示局限性:评价标准是从少数成功实施新产品开发项目的中小企业中提取的,因此可能受到一些背景因素的影响。结果不能推广到所有中小企业或所有项目,因为它们的特点可能不同。启示:本研究通过记录与项目管理约束相关的标准,为中小企业的新产品开发过程提供了一个新的前景。约束理论的整合有助于增加中小企业新产品开发项目管理和控制的理论知识。它提供了洞察项目经理(和其他决策者)如何通过管理项目约束和标准来增加项目成功的机会。因此,本研究中确定的评估标准可以用于中小企业经理和项目负责人寻求改善其新产品开发项目的管理和控制。这些标准可以帮助他们更好地管理有限的资源和技能,并将其分配给最有前途的项目。他们还可以帮助他们更有效地进行新产品开发过程,以实现预期目标,包括期望的项目盈利目标。原创性/价值本文为参与新产品开发项目的中小企业管理者在新产品开发过程的阶段和活动中需要考虑的评估标准提供了新的见解和实践意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
ACS Applied Bio Materials
ACS Applied Bio Materials Chemistry-Chemistry (all)
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
2.10%
发文量
464
期刊最新文献
A Systematic Review of Sleep Disturbance in Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension. Advancing Patient Education in Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension: The Promise of Large Language Models. Anti-Myelin-Associated Glycoprotein Neuropathy: Recent Developments. Approach to Managing the Initial Presentation of Multiple Sclerosis: A Worldwide Practice Survey. Association Between LACE+ Index Risk Category and 90-Day Mortality After Stroke.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1