Comparative study on the flame retardancy of CO2 and N2 during coal adiabatic oxidation process

IF 6.9 1区 工程技术 Q2 ENERGY & FUELS International Journal of Coal Science & Technology Pub Date : 2023-11-25 DOI:10.1007/s40789-023-00652-y
Xiyang Fang, Bo Tan, Haiyan Wang
{"title":"Comparative study on the flame retardancy of CO2 and N2 during coal adiabatic oxidation process","authors":"Xiyang Fang, Bo Tan, Haiyan Wang","doi":"10.1007/s40789-023-00652-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>To test the effectiveness of N<sub>2</sub> and CO<sub>2</sub> in preventing coal from spontaneously combusting, researchers used an adiabatic oxidation apparatus to conduct an experiment with different temperature starting points. Non-adsorbed helium (He) was used as a reference gas, and coal and oxygen concentration temperature variations were analyzed after inerting. The results showed that He had the best cooling effect, N<sub>2</sub> was second, and CO<sub>2</sub> was the worst. At 70℃ and 110℃, the impact of different gases on reducing oxygen concentration and the cooling effect was the same. However, at the starting temperature of 150℃, CO<sub>2</sub> was less effective in lowering oxygen concentration at the later stage than He and N<sub>2</sub>. N<sub>2</sub> and CO<sub>2</sub> can prolong the flame retardation time of inert gas and reduce oxygen displacement with an initial temperature increase. When the starting temperature is the same, N<sub>2</sub> injection cools coal samples and replaces oxygen more effectively than CO<sub>2</sub> injection. The flame retardancy of inert gas is the combined result of the cooling effect of inert gas and the replacement of oxygen. These findings are essential for using inert flame retardant technology in the goaf.</p>","PeriodicalId":53469,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Coal Science & Technology","volume":"191 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Coal Science & Technology","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40789-023-00652-y","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

To test the effectiveness of N2 and CO2 in preventing coal from spontaneously combusting, researchers used an adiabatic oxidation apparatus to conduct an experiment with different temperature starting points. Non-adsorbed helium (He) was used as a reference gas, and coal and oxygen concentration temperature variations were analyzed after inerting. The results showed that He had the best cooling effect, N2 was second, and CO2 was the worst. At 70℃ and 110℃, the impact of different gases on reducing oxygen concentration and the cooling effect was the same. However, at the starting temperature of 150℃, CO2 was less effective in lowering oxygen concentration at the later stage than He and N2. N2 and CO2 can prolong the flame retardation time of inert gas and reduce oxygen displacement with an initial temperature increase. When the starting temperature is the same, N2 injection cools coal samples and replaces oxygen more effectively than CO2 injection. The flame retardancy of inert gas is the combined result of the cooling effect of inert gas and the replacement of oxygen. These findings are essential for using inert flame retardant technology in the goaf.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
煤绝热氧化过程中CO2和N2的阻燃性比较研究
为了测试N2和CO2阻止煤自燃的有效性,研究人员使用绝热氧化装置进行了不同温度起点的实验。以未吸附的氦(He)为参比气体,分析惰化后煤和氧浓度温度的变化。结果表明,He的冷却效果最好,N2次之,CO2最差。在70℃和110℃时,不同气体对氧的还原浓度和冷却效果的影响是相同的。但在起始温度为150℃时,CO2对后期氧浓度的降低效果不如He和N2。N2和CO2可以延长惰性气体的阻燃时间,并随着初始温度的升高而减少氧的置换。在起始温度相同的情况下,注入N2比注入CO2更能有效地冷却煤样并替代氧气。惰性气体的阻燃性是惰性气体的冷却作用和氧气的替代作用共同作用的结果。这些发现对于在采空区应用惰性阻燃技术具有重要意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
11.40
自引率
8.40%
发文量
678
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Coal Science & Technology is a peer-reviewed open access journal that focuses on key topics of coal scientific research and mining development. It serves as a forum for scientists to present research findings and discuss challenging issues in the field. The journal covers a range of topics including coal geology, geochemistry, geophysics, mineralogy, and petrology. It also covers coal mining theory, technology, and engineering, as well as coal processing, utilization, and conversion. Additionally, the journal explores coal mining environment and reclamation, along with related aspects. The International Journal of Coal Science & Technology is published with China Coal Society, who also cover the publication costs. This means that authors do not need to pay an article-processing charge.
期刊最新文献
Coal ash resources and potential for rare earth element production in the United States Ecological environment quality assessment of coal mining cities based on GEE platform: A case study of Shuozhou, China Study on signal characteristics of burst tendency coal under different loading rates Image-based quantitative probing of 3D heterogeneous pore structure in CBM reservoir and permeability estimation with pore network modeling Spectral signatures of solvent-extracted macromolecules in Indian coals of different rank: Insights from fluorescence excitation-emission matrix
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1