Switching to Dolutegravir/lamivudine or Bictegravir/Emtricitabine/Tenofovir alafenamide. A comparative real-world study

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 INFECTIOUS DISEASES HIV Research & Clinical Practice Pub Date : 2023-07-26 DOI:10.1080/25787489.2023.2239564
Hernando Knobel, Esperanza Cañas-Ruano, Ana Guelar, Pablo Knobel, Judit Villar-García, Alicia González-Mena, Ceclia Canepa, Itziar Arrieta-Aldea, Augustin Marcos, Agustí Abalat-Torrres, Roberto Güerri-Fernández
{"title":"Switching to Dolutegravir/lamivudine or Bictegravir/Emtricitabine/Tenofovir alafenamide. A comparative real-world study","authors":"Hernando Knobel, Esperanza Cañas-Ruano, Ana Guelar, Pablo Knobel, Judit Villar-García, Alicia González-Mena, Ceclia Canepa, Itziar Arrieta-Aldea, Augustin Marcos, Agustí Abalat-Torrres, Roberto Güerri-Fernández","doi":"10.1080/25787489.2023.2239564","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3>Background </h3><p>This real-world study compared the safety and effectiveness of Dolutegravir/lamivudine (D/L) and Bictegravir/Emtricitabine/Tenefovir alafenamide (B/F/T) switch therapy regimens for people living with HIV (PLWH)</p><h3>Methods </h3><p>The retrospective study conducted from April 2019 to November 2022, included PLWH with &lt; 50 copies/mL of HIV-RNA prior to recruitment who initiated either D/L or B/F/T switching therapy. The primary objective was to evaluate treatment discontinuation rates; safety and virologic outcomes were also evaluated.</p><h3>Results </h3><p>690 PLWH were included, 358 in the D/L and 332 in the B/F/T, and a median follow-up of 728 and 1013 days, respectively. The discontinuation proportions were 8.7% (31 participants, incidence rate of 4.44 per 100 PYFU in the D/L group and 15.3% (51 participants, incidence rate of 6.25 per 100 PYFU) in the B/F/T group. The adjusted hazard ratio for B/F/T discontinuation compared to D/L was 1.20 (95% CI: 0.71;2.0; <i>p</i> = 0.494). Virologic failure (VL &gt; 200 copies/mL in two consecutive measurements) occurred in 1.1% and 0.9% of patients in the D/L and B/F/T groups, respectively. Notably, one patient in D/L group with severe non-adherence and virologic failure developed resistance mutations.</p><h3>Conclusions </h3><p>Switching to either B/T/F or D/L treatment for PLWH was effective and well tolerated in this real-world study. Treatment discontinuation rates did not significantly differ between the two regimens.</p>","PeriodicalId":13165,"journal":{"name":"HIV Research & Clinical Practice","volume":"72 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"HIV Research & Clinical Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/25787489.2023.2239564","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

This real-world study compared the safety and effectiveness of Dolutegravir/lamivudine (D/L) and Bictegravir/Emtricitabine/Tenefovir alafenamide (B/F/T) switch therapy regimens for people living with HIV (PLWH)

Methods

The retrospective study conducted from April 2019 to November 2022, included PLWH with < 50 copies/mL of HIV-RNA prior to recruitment who initiated either D/L or B/F/T switching therapy. The primary objective was to evaluate treatment discontinuation rates; safety and virologic outcomes were also evaluated.

Results

690 PLWH were included, 358 in the D/L and 332 in the B/F/T, and a median follow-up of 728 and 1013 days, respectively. The discontinuation proportions were 8.7% (31 participants, incidence rate of 4.44 per 100 PYFU in the D/L group and 15.3% (51 participants, incidence rate of 6.25 per 100 PYFU) in the B/F/T group. The adjusted hazard ratio for B/F/T discontinuation compared to D/L was 1.20 (95% CI: 0.71;2.0; p = 0.494). Virologic failure (VL > 200 copies/mL in two consecutive measurements) occurred in 1.1% and 0.9% of patients in the D/L and B/F/T groups, respectively. Notably, one patient in D/L group with severe non-adherence and virologic failure developed resistance mutations.

Conclusions

Switching to either B/T/F or D/L treatment for PLWH was effective and well tolerated in this real-world study. Treatment discontinuation rates did not significantly differ between the two regimens.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
改用多替格拉韦/拉米夫定或比替格拉韦/恩曲他滨/替诺福韦阿拉芬胺。一个比较现实世界的研究
本研究比较了多替格拉韦/拉米夫定(D/L)和比替格拉韦/恩曲他滨/替奈福韦拉米夫定(B/F/T)切换治疗方案对HIV感染者(PLWH)的安全性和有效性。方法回顾性研究于2019年4月至2022年11月进行。在招募前进行D/L或B/F/T转换治疗的HIV-RNA为50拷贝/mL。主要目的是评估治疗中断率;安全性和病毒学结果也进行了评估。结果共纳入690例PLWH, D/L组358例,B/F/T组332例,中位随访时间分别为728天和1013天。D/L组停药比例为8.7%(31例,发病率为4.44 / 100 PYFU), B/F/T组为15.3%(51例,发病率为6.25 / 100 PYFU)。与D/L相比,B/F/T停药的调整风险比为1.20 (95% CI: 0.71;2.0;p = 0.494)。病毒学失败(VL >在D/L组和B/F/T组中,分别有1.1%和0.9%的患者出现200拷贝/mL(连续两次测量)。值得注意的是,D/L组中有1例严重不依从性和病毒学失败的患者发生了耐药性突变。在这项现实世界的研究中,切换到B/T/F或D/L治疗PLWH是有效的,并且耐受性良好。两种治疗方案的停药率没有显著差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
6.20%
发文量
15
期刊最新文献
Alcohol use disorder, antiretroviral therapyBivariate associations of AIDS risk (measured via CD4 count) and mean adherence, and oral health in Peruvian MSM living with HIV. Markers of gut permeability, systemic inflammation and insulin resistance in people living with HIV in rural South Africa. Acute kidney and liver injury requiring hemodialysis following cathinone use in a person with HIV. Impact of analytical treatment interruptions on sexual behaviors: a mixed-methods longitudinal study of women enrolled in an HIV cure-related trial in Durban, South Africa. Pilot outcomes of a telehealth model for youth PrEP (TelePrEP) among youth at risk for HIV in Colorado.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1