Consultations for HIV post-exposure prophylaxis before and after health insurance coverage of pre-exposure prophylaxis to a university-based emergency department in Germany
Lennert Böhm, Björn-Erik Ole Jensen, Hubert Schelzig, Tom Luedde, Michael Bernhard
{"title":"Consultations for HIV post-exposure prophylaxis before and after health insurance coverage of pre-exposure prophylaxis to a university-based emergency department in Germany","authors":"Lennert Böhm, Björn-Erik Ole Jensen, Hubert Schelzig, Tom Luedde, Michael Bernhard","doi":"10.1080/25787489.2023.2207977","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><b>Background:</b> Potential risk contacts for HIV transmission may lead to presentations to the emergency department (ED) for counseling and initiation of post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP).</p><p><b>Objective:</b> To examine the impact of German health insurance covering pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) following Sept 1<sup>st</sup> 2019 for certain risk groups on the frequency and reasons for PEP counseling in a university-based ED in Germany.</p><p><b>Methods:</b> In a before-after study design, all persons aged ≥18 years who presented for PEP counseling were analyzed retrospectively. We compared characteristics of presentations in the 18 months prior to PrEP coverage on Sept 1<sup>st</sup>, 2019, with those in the following 18 months.</p><p><b>Results:</b> 154 ED presentations occurred in the first study period, and 155 ED presentations in the second period. Regarding the reasons for ED visits, no statistically significant difference was found [occupational risk contact (18.2 vs. 26.5%, <i>p</i> = 0.081), sexual risk contact (74.7 vs. 69.0%, <i>p</i> = 0.266), other non-occupational risk contact (7.1 vs. 4.5%, <i>p</i> = 0.329)]. For men who have sex with men (MSM), no statistically significant differences were found [38.9 (<i>n</i> = 60) vs. 35.5% (<i>n</i> = 55), <i>p</i> = 0.537]. All persons presenting to the HIV outpatient clinic after ED PEP initiation (<i>n</i> = 60 vs. <i>n</i> = 52) tested negative for HIV 3 months later.</p><p><b>Conclusion:</b> In this study, reasons to present for PEP counseling to a university ED showed no change following the implementation of PrEP coverage by health insurances. Therefore, PEP remains an important prevention for HIV transmission and presentations to the ED for PEP counseling may provide an opportunity to educate persons at risk of HIV infection about PrEP, thereby helping to prevent new HIV infections.</p>","PeriodicalId":13165,"journal":{"name":"HIV Research & Clinical Practice","volume":"56 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"HIV Research & Clinical Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/25787489.2023.2207977","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Potential risk contacts for HIV transmission may lead to presentations to the emergency department (ED) for counseling and initiation of post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP).
Objective: To examine the impact of German health insurance covering pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) following Sept 1st 2019 for certain risk groups on the frequency and reasons for PEP counseling in a university-based ED in Germany.
Methods: In a before-after study design, all persons aged ≥18 years who presented for PEP counseling were analyzed retrospectively. We compared characteristics of presentations in the 18 months prior to PrEP coverage on Sept 1st, 2019, with those in the following 18 months.
Results: 154 ED presentations occurred in the first study period, and 155 ED presentations in the second period. Regarding the reasons for ED visits, no statistically significant difference was found [occupational risk contact (18.2 vs. 26.5%, p = 0.081), sexual risk contact (74.7 vs. 69.0%, p = 0.266), other non-occupational risk contact (7.1 vs. 4.5%, p = 0.329)]. For men who have sex with men (MSM), no statistically significant differences were found [38.9 (n = 60) vs. 35.5% (n = 55), p = 0.537]. All persons presenting to the HIV outpatient clinic after ED PEP initiation (n = 60 vs. n = 52) tested negative for HIV 3 months later.
Conclusion: In this study, reasons to present for PEP counseling to a university ED showed no change following the implementation of PrEP coverage by health insurances. Therefore, PEP remains an important prevention for HIV transmission and presentations to the ED for PEP counseling may provide an opportunity to educate persons at risk of HIV infection about PrEP, thereby helping to prevent new HIV infections.
背景:潜在的艾滋病毒传播风险接触可能导致到急诊科(ED)进行咨询和接触后预防(PEP)的开始。目的:研究2019年9月1日之后,针对特定风险人群的德国医疗保险覆盖暴露前预防(PrEP)对德国一所大学急诊科PEP咨询频率和原因的影响。方法:采用前后对照研究设计,回顾性分析所有年龄≥18岁接受PEP咨询的患者。我们比较了2019年9月1日PrEP覆盖前18个月的报告特征,以及随后18个月的报告特征。结果:第一个研究期间发生了154例ED,第二个研究期间发生了155例ED。在ED就诊原因方面,职业风险接触(18.2 vs. 26.5%, p = 0.081)、性风险接触(74.7 vs. 69.0%, p = 0.266)、其他非职业风险接触(7.1 vs. 4.5%, p = 0.329)差异无统计学意义。对于男男性行为者(MSM),差异无统计学意义[38.9% (n = 60)比35.5% (n = 55), p = 0.537]。所有在ED PEP开始后到HIV门诊就诊的人(n = 60 vs. n = 52)在3个月后HIV检测呈阴性。结论:在本研究中,在健康保险实施PrEP覆盖后,向大学ED提出PEP咨询的原因没有变化。因此,PEP仍然是HIV传播的重要预防措施,向ED介绍PEP咨询可能提供一个机会,向有HIV感染风险的人宣传PrEP,从而有助于预防新的HIV感染。