Consecutive decentralization: The effect of central bank independence on capital account liberalization

IF 1.5 4区 经济学 Q2 ECONOMICS Economics & Politics Pub Date : 2023-12-03 DOI:10.1111/ecpo.12271
Joon Hyeok Lee
{"title":"Consecutive decentralization: The effect of central bank independence on capital account liberalization","authors":"Joon Hyeok Lee","doi":"10.1111/ecpo.12271","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Central bank independence (CBI) has been widely advocated as a means to address the time-inconsistency problem of controlling inflation. Consequently, many countries have embraced central bank reforms since the 1990s. While extant research in political science has sought to unveil the consequences of CBI, there remains an unexplained variation in the response of countries with regard to capital account openness. Notably, a positive association exists between CBI and capital account openness due to the constraints CBI places on leaders' discretionary monetary and fiscal policies, thereby fostering reliance on financial policy to boost their economies. However, this relationship is contingent on the domestic political contexts of countries. CBI leads to capital account liberalization only when the rule of law is guaranteed, given that CBI is often stipulated by laws. Therefore, in countries where political leaders can easily override formal rules, CBI shows no discernible impact on capital account openness. Employing two-way fixed-effects and error-correction models, the study reveals that CBI increases capital account openness only in democracies, in the presence of multiple veto players, and a high level of transparency. The findings underscore the pivotal role of the domestic political environment in analyzing how CBI constrains political leaders.</p>","PeriodicalId":47220,"journal":{"name":"Economics & Politics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Economics & Politics","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ecpo.12271","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Central bank independence (CBI) has been widely advocated as a means to address the time-inconsistency problem of controlling inflation. Consequently, many countries have embraced central bank reforms since the 1990s. While extant research in political science has sought to unveil the consequences of CBI, there remains an unexplained variation in the response of countries with regard to capital account openness. Notably, a positive association exists between CBI and capital account openness due to the constraints CBI places on leaders' discretionary monetary and fiscal policies, thereby fostering reliance on financial policy to boost their economies. However, this relationship is contingent on the domestic political contexts of countries. CBI leads to capital account liberalization only when the rule of law is guaranteed, given that CBI is often stipulated by laws. Therefore, in countries where political leaders can easily override formal rules, CBI shows no discernible impact on capital account openness. Employing two-way fixed-effects and error-correction models, the study reveals that CBI increases capital account openness only in democracies, in the presence of multiple veto players, and a high level of transparency. The findings underscore the pivotal role of the domestic political environment in analyzing how CBI constrains political leaders.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
连续分权:中央银行独立性对资本项目自由化的影响
中央银行独立性(CBI)作为解决控制通货膨胀的时间不一致性问题的一种手段被广泛提倡。因此,自上世纪90年代以来,许多国家都接受了央行改革。虽然现有的政治学研究试图揭示CBI的后果,但各国对资本账户开放的反应仍然存在无法解释的差异。值得注意的是,CBI与资本账户开放之间存在正相关关系,因为CBI对领导人的自由裁量货币和财政政策施加了限制,从而促进了对金融政策的依赖,以促进其经济发展。然而,这种关系取决于各国的国内政治背景。CBI通常是由法律规定的,只有在法治得到保障的情况下,CBI才会导致资本账户自由化。因此,在政治领导人可以轻易推翻正式规则的国家,CBI对资本账户开放没有明显影响。采用双向固定效应和纠错模型,该研究表明,CBI只在民主国家,在存在多个否决权的参与者和高度透明度的情况下,才会增加资本账户的开放性。研究结果强调了国内政治环境在分析CBI如何约束政治领导人方面的关键作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
10.00%
发文量
32
期刊介绍: Economics & Politics focuses on analytical political economy, broadly defined as the study of economic and political phenomena and policy in models that include political processes, institutions and markets. The journal is the source for innovative theoretical and empirical work on the intersection of politics and economics, at both domestic and international levels, and aims to promote new approaches on how these forces interact to affect political outcomes and policy choices, economic performance and societal welfare. Economics & Politics is a vital source of information for economists, academics and students, providing: - Analytical political economics - International scholarship - Accessible & thought-provoking articles - Creative inter-disciplinary analysis
期刊最新文献
What causes polarized stagnation, corporate economy, or welfare state?: Insights from new development economics The effects of non‐trade non‐rent barriers on intra‐Africa trade Patriarchy, pandemics, and the gendered resource curse thesis: Evidence from petroleum geology How does oil policy uncertainty influence resource rents? New empirical evidence from Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries Appropriability, institutions, and welfare in a Tullock contest
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1