Disclosure in Civil Proceedings in the UK and Kazakhstan: Comparative Analysis

IF 0.3 Q3 LAW Statute Law Review Pub Date : 2023-11-28 DOI:10.1093/slr/hmad010
Aizhan Satayeva
{"title":"Disclosure in Civil Proceedings in the UK and Kazakhstan: Comparative Analysis","authors":"Aizhan Satayeva","doi":"10.1093/slr/hmad010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The relevance of the chosen problem is conditioned by the need to develop theoretical ideas about the institution of disclosure of documents in the civil procedural legislation of the Republic of Kazakhstan, considering the experience of the UK, which will emphasize the potential of this measure to improve procedural discipline and ensure legal certainty in making court decisions and increase the level of legal culture in Kazakhstan, which may affect the effectiveness of this procedure or this institution in practice. The purpose of this study was to characterize the institute of disclosure of documents in civil proceedings using methods of comparative legal analysis of English contract law and the current legislation of the Republic of Kazakhstan. The methodological basis of the study consists of dialectical method, comparative legal analysis, analysis and synthesis, formal and logical, formal and legal, classification and grouping, and questionnaire methods. There is an urgent need to develop theoretical ideas about the disclosure of documents in the Republic of Kazakhstan, especially in light of the introduction of new elements of disclosure such as pre-trial protocol in the civil process.","PeriodicalId":43737,"journal":{"name":"Statute Law Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Statute Law Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/slr/hmad010","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The relevance of the chosen problem is conditioned by the need to develop theoretical ideas about the institution of disclosure of documents in the civil procedural legislation of the Republic of Kazakhstan, considering the experience of the UK, which will emphasize the potential of this measure to improve procedural discipline and ensure legal certainty in making court decisions and increase the level of legal culture in Kazakhstan, which may affect the effectiveness of this procedure or this institution in practice. The purpose of this study was to characterize the institute of disclosure of documents in civil proceedings using methods of comparative legal analysis of English contract law and the current legislation of the Republic of Kazakhstan. The methodological basis of the study consists of dialectical method, comparative legal analysis, analysis and synthesis, formal and logical, formal and legal, classification and grouping, and questionnaire methods. There is an urgent need to develop theoretical ideas about the disclosure of documents in the Republic of Kazakhstan, especially in light of the introduction of new elements of disclosure such as pre-trial protocol in the civil process.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
英国和哈萨克斯坦民事诉讼中的信息披露:比较分析
所选问题的相关性取决于需要发展关于哈萨克斯坦共和国民事诉讼立法中文件披露制度的理论思想,考虑到联合王国的经验,联合王国将强调这一措施的潜力,以改善程序纪律,确保作出法院判决的法律确定性,并提高哈萨克斯坦的法律文化水平。这可能会影响本程序或本机构在实践中的有效性。本研究的目的是利用对英国合同法和哈萨克斯坦共和国现行立法的比较法律分析方法,描述民事诉讼中文件披露制度的特点。研究的方法论基础包括辨证法、比较法、分析与综合、形式与逻辑、形式与法律、分类与分组、问卷调查法。迫切需要发展关于哈萨克斯坦共和国文件公开的理论构想,特别是考虑到在民事诉讼程序中引入了诸如审前议定书等新的公开要素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
10
期刊介绍: The principal objectives of the Review are to provide a vehicle for the consideration of the legislative process, the use of legislation as an instrument of public policy and of the drafting and interpretation of legislation. The Review, which was first established in 1980, is the only journal of its kind within the Commonwealth. It is of particular value to lawyers in both private practice and in public service, and to academics, both lawyers and political scientists, who write and teach within the field of legislation.
期刊最新文献
Revisiting Criminal Law Bills: An In-Depth Critical Analysis of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Bill and Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Bill Four Years of Anti-COVID-19 Regulations in Greece: Overview of the Legislative and Regulatory Process and of an Exemplary Administrative Codification Two Uses of Purpose in Statutory Interpretation Climate Volatility, Foundational Freedoms, and the Environment Act 2021: The Transformative Potential of the Principle of Legality Protection of Athletes’ Rights in International Sports Organizations
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1