Learning the Ropes of Tatparya: Revival of the Mimansa Rules of Interpretation

IF 0.3 Q3 LAW Statute Law Review Pub Date : 2022-03-21 DOI:10.1093/slr/hmac002
Krishna Agarwal
{"title":"Learning the Ropes of Tatparya: Revival of the Mimansa Rules of Interpretation","authors":"Krishna Agarwal","doi":"10.1093/slr/hmac002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The primary task of the judiciary while interpreting the statute is to ascertain the true intention of the legislature. Maxwell on the interpretation of Statutes, setting out the principles evolved by the English Courts, is of immense help in the interpretation of statutes. An indigenous alternative that has been used by the Indian judiciary time and again is the Mimansa Rules which are the traditional rules of interpretation laid down by Jaimini to interpret Brahmanas. Despite dating back to the 5th century BC, these principles are considered scientific to an extent that they can be used to interpret the modern statutes and judgments. The Indian judiciary has adopted the principles of Mimansa to adjudicate several disputes about statutory interpretation. In light of these judgments, the researcher examines the scientific nature and application of the Mimansa Rules of Interpretation in contemporary times in parallel with the Maxwell’s Principles.","PeriodicalId":43737,"journal":{"name":"Statute Law Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Statute Law Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/slr/hmac002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract The primary task of the judiciary while interpreting the statute is to ascertain the true intention of the legislature. Maxwell on the interpretation of Statutes, setting out the principles evolved by the English Courts, is of immense help in the interpretation of statutes. An indigenous alternative that has been used by the Indian judiciary time and again is the Mimansa Rules which are the traditional rules of interpretation laid down by Jaimini to interpret Brahmanas. Despite dating back to the 5th century BC, these principles are considered scientific to an extent that they can be used to interpret the modern statutes and judgments. The Indian judiciary has adopted the principles of Mimansa to adjudicate several disputes about statutory interpretation. In light of these judgments, the researcher examines the scientific nature and application of the Mimansa Rules of Interpretation in contemporary times in parallel with the Maxwell’s Principles.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
学习Tatparya的绳索:米曼萨解释规则的复兴
司法部门在解释法规时的首要任务是确定立法机关的真实意图。麦克斯韦尔的《法规解释》阐述了英国法院演变的原则,对解释法规有很大的帮助。印度司法部门一次又一次使用的土著替代方案是米曼萨规则,这是斋弥尼制定的解释婆罗门的传统规则。尽管可以追溯到公元前5世纪,但这些原则在一定程度上被认为是科学的,它们可以用来解释现代的法规和判决。印度司法机构采用了米曼萨原则来裁决一些关于法律解释的纠纷。根据这些判断,研究人员考察了米曼萨解释规则在当代与麦克斯韦原理并行的科学性和应用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
10
期刊介绍: The principal objectives of the Review are to provide a vehicle for the consideration of the legislative process, the use of legislation as an instrument of public policy and of the drafting and interpretation of legislation. The Review, which was first established in 1980, is the only journal of its kind within the Commonwealth. It is of particular value to lawyers in both private practice and in public service, and to academics, both lawyers and political scientists, who write and teach within the field of legislation.
期刊最新文献
Revisiting Criminal Law Bills: An In-Depth Critical Analysis of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Bill and Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Bill Four Years of Anti-COVID-19 Regulations in Greece: Overview of the Legislative and Regulatory Process and of an Exemplary Administrative Codification Two Uses of Purpose in Statutory Interpretation Climate Volatility, Foundational Freedoms, and the Environment Act 2021: The Transformative Potential of the Principle of Legality Protection of Athletes’ Rights in International Sports Organizations
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1