Teacher–Child Interactions During Toy Play and Book Sharing

IF 2.1 3区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Early Education and Development Pub Date : 2022-11-08 DOI:10.1080/10409289.2022.2142028
Hanne Røe-Indregård, Ellen Irén Brinchmann, Veslemøy Rydland, Meredith L. Rowe, Bente E. Hagtvet, Imac M. Zambrana
{"title":"Teacher–Child Interactions During Toy Play and Book Sharing","authors":"Hanne Røe-Indregård, Ellen Irén Brinchmann, Veslemøy Rydland, Meredith L. Rowe, Bente E. Hagtvet, Imac M. Zambrana","doi":"10.1080/10409289.2022.2142028","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><b>ABSTRACT</b></p><p><i>Research Findings:</i> Although it is well documented that toy play and book sharing shape communication between adults and children in different ways, relatively few studies have compared teacher – child interactions in the two activities. The aim of this observational study was to describe and compare the conversational functions of teachers’ and children’s interactional contributions during book sharing and toy play. Examining dyads of five- to six-year-old children (<i>N</i> = 38) and their preschool teachers in the two activities, we found that the teachers produced significantly higher proportions of questions during toy play and higher proportions of statements during book sharing and that their questions tended to be more advanced (i.e. inferential) during book sharing compared to toy play. Moreover, sequential analyses of the immediate dependencies between the teachers’ and children’s contributions revealed that the teachers’ statements were more likely to follow the children’s questions during toy play than during book sharing, which may suggest more “back-and-forth” communication during play. <i>Practice or Policy:</i> The study findings indicate that toy play and book sharing provide children with complementary communication experiences and that the choice of activity may shape their opportunities to engage in educational dialogs.</p>","PeriodicalId":11448,"journal":{"name":"Early Education and Development","volume":"39 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Early Education and Development","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10409289.2022.2142028","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT

Research Findings: Although it is well documented that toy play and book sharing shape communication between adults and children in different ways, relatively few studies have compared teacher – child interactions in the two activities. The aim of this observational study was to describe and compare the conversational functions of teachers’ and children’s interactional contributions during book sharing and toy play. Examining dyads of five- to six-year-old children (N = 38) and their preschool teachers in the two activities, we found that the teachers produced significantly higher proportions of questions during toy play and higher proportions of statements during book sharing and that their questions tended to be more advanced (i.e. inferential) during book sharing compared to toy play. Moreover, sequential analyses of the immediate dependencies between the teachers’ and children’s contributions revealed that the teachers’ statements were more likely to follow the children’s questions during toy play than during book sharing, which may suggest more “back-and-forth” communication during play. Practice or Policy: The study findings indicate that toy play and book sharing provide children with complementary communication experiences and that the choice of activity may shape their opportunities to engage in educational dialogs.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
玩具游戏与图书分享过程中的师生互动
摘要研究发现:虽然玩具游戏和分享书籍以不同的方式塑造了成人和儿童之间的交流,但相对较少的研究比较了这两种活动中教师与儿童的互动。本观察性研究的目的是描述和比较教师和儿童在分享书籍和玩玩具时的互动贡献的会话功能。通过对5 ~ 6岁幼儿(N = 38)和幼儿教师进行两种活动的调查,我们发现教师在玩玩具时提出的问题比例显著高于在分享书籍时提出的陈述比例,并且在分享书籍时提出的问题比玩玩具时提出的问题更高级(即推理)。此外,对教师和儿童的贡献之间的直接依赖关系的序列分析显示,教师的陈述更有可能遵循儿童在玩玩具时提出的问题,而不是在分享书籍时提出的问题,这可能表明在游戏过程中有更多的“来回”交流。实践还是政策:研究结果表明,玩玩具和分享书籍为儿童提供了互补的交流经验,活动的选择可能会影响他们参与教育对话的机会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
10.30%
发文量
78
期刊介绍: Early Education and Development (EE&D) is a professional journal for those involved in educational and preschool services and research related to children and their families: early education supervisors, school psychologists, daycare administrators, child development specialists, developmental and child clinical psychologists, and special education administrators. It is designed to emphasize the implications for practice of research and solid scientific information. The age range focused upon is preschool through the primary grades. EE&D is a connecting link between the research community in early education and child development and school district early education programs, daycare systems, and special needs preschool programs.
期刊最新文献
What Drives Early Childhood Providers to Increase Quality? Using Expectancy-Value Theory to Understand Providers’ Motivations and Challenges in Quality Rating and Improvement Systems Intergenerational Pathways Linking Mothers’ Childhood Traumatic Experiences and Preschoolers’ Prosocial Behaviors Empowered, Strained, or Stable: Teachers’ Experiences of Occupational Well-Being During the Two-Year Pre-Primary Education Trial in Finland Is Temperament Associated with Academic School Readiness in Children Born Very Preterm? Prosocial Behavior in Early Childhood Across Boys and Girls: Associations Among Parent- and Teacher-Report and Child Behavior on the Dictator Game
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1