First, Do No Harm: Algorithms, AI, and Digital Product Liability

Marc J. Pfeiffer
{"title":"First, Do No Harm: Algorithms, AI, and Digital Product Liability","authors":"Marc J. Pfeiffer","doi":"arxiv-2311.10861","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The ethical imperative for technology should be first, do no harm. But\ndigital innovations like AI and social media increasingly enable societal\nharms, from bias to misinformation. As these technologies grow ubiquitous, we\nneed solutions to address unintended consequences. This report proposes a model\nto incentivize developers to prevent foreseeable algorithmic harms. It does\nthis by expanding negligence and product liability laws. Digital product\ndevelopers would be incentivized to mitigate potential algorithmic risks before\ndeployment to protect themselves and investors. Standards and penalties would\nbe set proportional to harm. Insurers would require harm mitigation during\ndevelopment in order to obtain coverage. This shifts tech ethics from move fast\nand break things to first, do no harm. Details would need careful refinement\nbetween stakeholders to enact reasonable guardrails without stifling\ninnovation. Policy and harm prevention frameworks would likely evolve over\ntime. Similar accountability schemes have helped address workplace,\nenvironmental, and product safety. Introducing algorithmic harm negligence\nliability would acknowledge the real societal costs of unethical tech. The\ntiming is right for reform. This proposal provides a model to steer the digital\nrevolution toward human rights and dignity. Harm prevention must be prioritized\nover reckless growth. Vigorous liability policies are essential to stop\ntechnologists from breaking things","PeriodicalId":501487,"journal":{"name":"arXiv - QuantFin - Economics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"arXiv - QuantFin - Economics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/arxiv-2311.10861","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The ethical imperative for technology should be first, do no harm. But digital innovations like AI and social media increasingly enable societal harms, from bias to misinformation. As these technologies grow ubiquitous, we need solutions to address unintended consequences. This report proposes a model to incentivize developers to prevent foreseeable algorithmic harms. It does this by expanding negligence and product liability laws. Digital product developers would be incentivized to mitigate potential algorithmic risks before deployment to protect themselves and investors. Standards and penalties would be set proportional to harm. Insurers would require harm mitigation during development in order to obtain coverage. This shifts tech ethics from move fast and break things to first, do no harm. Details would need careful refinement between stakeholders to enact reasonable guardrails without stifling innovation. Policy and harm prevention frameworks would likely evolve over time. Similar accountability schemes have helped address workplace, environmental, and product safety. Introducing algorithmic harm negligence liability would acknowledge the real societal costs of unethical tech. The timing is right for reform. This proposal provides a model to steer the digital revolution toward human rights and dignity. Harm prevention must be prioritized over reckless growth. Vigorous liability policies are essential to stop technologists from breaking things
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
第一,不伤害:算法、人工智能和数字产品责任
技术的伦理责任应该放在第一位,不要造成伤害。但人工智能和社交媒体等数字创新越来越多地造成社会危害,从偏见到错误信息。随着这些技术变得无处不在,我们需要解决方案来解决意想不到的后果。本报告提出了一个模型来激励开发人员防止可预见的算法危害。它通过扩大过失和产品责任法来做到这一点。数字产品开发人员将受到激励,在部署之前降低潜在的算法风险,以保护自己和投资者。标准和处罚将与损害成正比。保险公司将要求在开发过程中减少损害,以便获得保险。这将把技术伦理从快速行动和打破事物转变为首先,不伤害。细节需要在利益相关者之间进行仔细的完善,以便在不扼杀创新的情况下制定合理的保护措施。政策和预防伤害框架可能会随着时间的推移而演变。类似的问责制有助于解决工作场所、环境和产品安全问题。引入算法损害可忽略性将承认不道德技术的真正社会成本。这一提议提供了一个模式,引导数字革命走向人权和尊严。必须优先考虑危害预防,而不是不计后果的增长。强有力的责任政策对于阻止技术人员破坏东西至关重要
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Uncertainty of Supply Chains: Risk and Ambiguity Crypto Market Analysis & Real-Estate Business Protocol Proposal | Application of Ethereum Blockchain Monetary Policies on Green Financial Markets: Evidence from a Multi-Moment Connectedness Network Simulating the economic impact of rationality through reinforcement learning and agent-based modelling The Economy and Public Diplomacy: An Analysis of RT's Economic Content and Context on Facebook
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1