Optimal Investment and Fair Sharing Rules of the Incentives for Renewable Energy Communities

Almendra Awerkin, Paolo Falbo, Tiziano Vargiolu
{"title":"Optimal Investment and Fair Sharing Rules of the Incentives for Renewable Energy Communities","authors":"Almendra Awerkin, Paolo Falbo, Tiziano Vargiolu","doi":"arxiv-2311.12055","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The focus on Renewable Energy Communities (REC) is fastly growing after the\nEuropean Union (EU) has introduced a dedicated regulation in 2018. The idea of\ncreating local groups of citizens, small- and medium-sized companies, and\npublic institutions, which self-produce and self-consume energy from renewable\nsources is at the same time a way to save money for the participants, increase\nefficiency of the energy system, and reduce CO$_2$ emissions. Member states\ninside the EU are fixing more detailed regulations, which describe, how public\nincentives are measured. A natural objective for the incentive policies is of\ncourse to promote the self-consumption of a REC. A sophisticated incentive\npolicy is that based on the so called 'virtual framework'. Under this framework\nall the energy produced by a REC is sold to the market, and all the energy\nconsumed must be paid to retailers: self-consumption occurs only 'virtually',\nthanks a money compensation (paid by a central authority) for every MWh\nproduced and consumed by the REC in the same hour. In this context, two\nproblems have to be solved: the optimal investment in new technologies and a\nfair division of the incentive among the community members. We address these\nproblems by considering a particular type of REC, composed by a representative\nhousehold and a biogas producer, where the potential demand of the community is\ngiven by the household's demand, while both members produce renewable energy.\nWe set the problem as a leader-follower problem: the leader decide how to share\nthe incentive for the self-consumed energy, while the followers decide their\nown optimal installation strategy. We solve the leader's problem by searching\nfor a Nash bargaining solution for the incentive's fair division, while the\nfollower problem is solved by finding the Nash equilibria of a static\ncompetitive game between the members.","PeriodicalId":501487,"journal":{"name":"arXiv - QuantFin - Economics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"arXiv - QuantFin - Economics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/arxiv-2311.12055","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The focus on Renewable Energy Communities (REC) is fastly growing after the European Union (EU) has introduced a dedicated regulation in 2018. The idea of creating local groups of citizens, small- and medium-sized companies, and public institutions, which self-produce and self-consume energy from renewable sources is at the same time a way to save money for the participants, increase efficiency of the energy system, and reduce CO$_2$ emissions. Member states inside the EU are fixing more detailed regulations, which describe, how public incentives are measured. A natural objective for the incentive policies is of course to promote the self-consumption of a REC. A sophisticated incentive policy is that based on the so called 'virtual framework'. Under this framework all the energy produced by a REC is sold to the market, and all the energy consumed must be paid to retailers: self-consumption occurs only 'virtually', thanks a money compensation (paid by a central authority) for every MWh produced and consumed by the REC in the same hour. In this context, two problems have to be solved: the optimal investment in new technologies and a fair division of the incentive among the community members. We address these problems by considering a particular type of REC, composed by a representative household and a biogas producer, where the potential demand of the community is given by the household's demand, while both members produce renewable energy. We set the problem as a leader-follower problem: the leader decide how to share the incentive for the self-consumed energy, while the followers decide their own optimal installation strategy. We solve the leader's problem by searching for a Nash bargaining solution for the incentive's fair division, while the follower problem is solved by finding the Nash equilibria of a static competitive game between the members.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
可再生能源社区激励的最优投资与公平分担规则
在欧盟(EU)于2018年推出专门法规后,对可再生能源社区(REC)的关注正在迅速增长。建立由当地居民、中小企业和公共机构组成的团体,自行生产和使用可再生能源,同时为参与者节省资金,提高能源系统的效率,减少二氧化碳排放。欧盟成员国正在制定更详细的法规,描述如何衡量公共激励。激励政策的自然目标当然是促进REC的自我消费。一个复杂的激励政策是基于所谓的“虚拟框架”。在这个框架下,REC生产的所有能源都出售给市场,所有消耗的能源都必须支付给零售商:由于REC在同一小时内生产和消耗的每兆瓦电力都有货币补偿(由中央当局支付),因此自我消费只发生“虚拟”。在此背景下,必须解决两个问题:对新技术的最优投资和社区成员之间激励的公平分配。我们通过考虑一种特定类型的REC来解决这些问题,该REC由一个有代表性的家庭和一个沼气生产商组成,其中社区的潜在需求由家庭的需求给出,而双方成员都生产可再生能源。我们将问题设置为一个领导-追随者问题:领导者决定如何分享自己消耗的能量的激励,而追随者决定自己的最优安装策略。我们通过寻找激励公平分配的纳什议价解来解决领导者问题,而通过寻找成员之间静态竞争博弈的纳什均衡来解决追随者问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Uncertainty of Supply Chains: Risk and Ambiguity Crypto Market Analysis & Real-Estate Business Protocol Proposal | Application of Ethereum Blockchain Monetary Policies on Green Financial Markets: Evidence from a Multi-Moment Connectedness Network Simulating the economic impact of rationality through reinforcement learning and agent-based modelling The Economy and Public Diplomacy: An Analysis of RT's Economic Content and Context on Facebook
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1