Do we listen to what we are told? An empirical study on human behaviour during the COVID-19 pandemic: neural networks vs. regression analysis

Yuxi Heluo, Kexin Wang, Charles W. Robson
{"title":"Do we listen to what we are told? An empirical study on human behaviour during the COVID-19 pandemic: neural networks vs. regression analysis","authors":"Yuxi Heluo, Kexin Wang, Charles W. Robson","doi":"arxiv-2311.13046","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this work, we contribute the first visual open-source empirical study on\nhuman behaviour during the COVID-19 pandemic, in order to investigate how\ncompliant a general population is to mask-wearing-related public-health policy.\nObject-detection-based convolutional neural networks, regression analysis and\nmultilayer perceptrons are combined to analyse visual data of the Viennese\npublic during 2020. We find that mask-wearing-related government regulations\nand public-transport announcements encouraged correct mask-wearing-behaviours\nduring the COVID-19 pandemic. Importantly, changes in announcement and\nregulation contents led to heterogeneous effects on people's behaviour.\nComparing the predictive power of regression analysis and neural networks, we\ndemonstrate that the latter produces more accurate predictions of population\nreactions during the COVID-19 pandemic. Our use of regression modelling also\nallows us to unearth possible causal pathways underlying societal behaviour.\nSince our findings highlight the importance of appropriate communication\ncontents, our results will facilitate more effective non-pharmaceutical\ninterventions to be developed in future. Adding to the literature, we\ndemonstrate that regression modelling and neural networks are not mutually\nexclusive but instead complement each other.","PeriodicalId":501487,"journal":{"name":"arXiv - QuantFin - Economics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"arXiv - QuantFin - Economics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/arxiv-2311.13046","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In this work, we contribute the first visual open-source empirical study on human behaviour during the COVID-19 pandemic, in order to investigate how compliant a general population is to mask-wearing-related public-health policy. Object-detection-based convolutional neural networks, regression analysis and multilayer perceptrons are combined to analyse visual data of the Viennese public during 2020. We find that mask-wearing-related government regulations and public-transport announcements encouraged correct mask-wearing-behaviours during the COVID-19 pandemic. Importantly, changes in announcement and regulation contents led to heterogeneous effects on people's behaviour. Comparing the predictive power of regression analysis and neural networks, we demonstrate that the latter produces more accurate predictions of population reactions during the COVID-19 pandemic. Our use of regression modelling also allows us to unearth possible causal pathways underlying societal behaviour. Since our findings highlight the importance of appropriate communication contents, our results will facilitate more effective non-pharmaceutical interventions to be developed in future. Adding to the literature, we demonstrate that regression modelling and neural networks are not mutually exclusive but instead complement each other.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
我们听别人说的话了吗?COVID-19大流行期间人类行为的实证研究:神经网络与回归分析
在这项工作中,我们首次对COVID-19大流行期间的人类行为进行了可视化的开源实证研究,以调查普通人群对佩戴口罩相关公共卫生政策的依从程度。结合基于目标检测的卷积神经网络、回归分析和多层感知器来分析2020年维也纳公众的视觉数据。我们发现,在COVID-19大流行期间,与戴口罩有关的政府法规和公共交通公告鼓励了正确的戴口罩行为。重要的是,公告和监管内容的变化导致了人们行为的异质性影响。比较回归分析和神经网络的预测能力,我们发现后者对COVID-19大流行期间的人群反应做出了更准确的预测。我们对回归模型的使用也使我们能够揭示潜在社会行为的可能因果途径。由于我们的发现强调了适当的传播内容的重要性,我们的结果将促进未来开发更有效的非药物干预措施。加上文献,我们证明回归建模和神经网络不是相互排斥的,而是相互补充的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Uncertainty of Supply Chains: Risk and Ambiguity Crypto Market Analysis & Real-Estate Business Protocol Proposal | Application of Ethereum Blockchain Monetary Policies on Green Financial Markets: Evidence from a Multi-Moment Connectedness Network Simulating the economic impact of rationality through reinforcement learning and agent-based modelling The Economy and Public Diplomacy: An Analysis of RT's Economic Content and Context on Facebook
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1