Achievement at what cost? An intersectional approach to assessing race and gender differences in adolescent math motivation and achievement

IF 3.9 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL Contemporary Educational Psychology Pub Date : 2023-12-02 DOI:10.1016/j.cedpsych.2023.102253
Sarah E. McKellar , Channing J. Mathews , Allison M. Greene , Ming-Te Wang
{"title":"Achievement at what cost? An intersectional approach to assessing race and gender differences in adolescent math motivation and achievement","authors":"Sarah E. McKellar ,&nbsp;Channing J. Mathews ,&nbsp;Allison M. Greene ,&nbsp;Ming-Te Wang","doi":"10.1016/j.cedpsych.2023.102253","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Given math-related fields are still highly racialized and gendered (<span>NCSES, 2021</span><span>), this study assessed: 1) whether there were racial differences in adolescents’ perceived math cost alongside expectancies and values and 2) the extent to which perceived math cost alongside expectancies and values explained yearly changes in achievement differences by race and gender. This study assessed 2,338 Black (39.4 %) and White (60.6 %) adolescents, roughly half girls (47.8 %), in the 6th to 12th grades (M = 14.71 years old, SD = 1.93, 61.7 % qualifying for free or reduced priced lunch). The results indicated that Black adolescents perceived higher costs to learning math than their White peers but value math in similar ways. Perceived math cost was the only motivational belief to explain achievement differences between Black and White girls but not boys after adjusting for socioeconomic status and grade level. In contrast, perceptions of ability beliefs explained achievement differences between Black boys and girls. These findings point to the importance of employing intersectional approaches to understand the relationship between math motivation and achievement.</span></p></div>","PeriodicalId":10635,"journal":{"name":"Contemporary Educational Psychology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Contemporary Educational Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0361476X23001078","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Given math-related fields are still highly racialized and gendered (NCSES, 2021), this study assessed: 1) whether there were racial differences in adolescents’ perceived math cost alongside expectancies and values and 2) the extent to which perceived math cost alongside expectancies and values explained yearly changes in achievement differences by race and gender. This study assessed 2,338 Black (39.4 %) and White (60.6 %) adolescents, roughly half girls (47.8 %), in the 6th to 12th grades (M = 14.71 years old, SD = 1.93, 61.7 % qualifying for free or reduced priced lunch). The results indicated that Black adolescents perceived higher costs to learning math than their White peers but value math in similar ways. Perceived math cost was the only motivational belief to explain achievement differences between Black and White girls but not boys after adjusting for socioeconomic status and grade level. In contrast, perceptions of ability beliefs explained achievement differences between Black boys and girls. These findings point to the importance of employing intersectional approaches to understand the relationship between math motivation and achievement.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
成就的代价是什么?评估青少年数学动机和成绩的种族和性别差异的交叉方法
鉴于数学相关领域仍然高度种族化和性别化(NCSE, 2021),本研究评估了:1)青少年感知数学成本与期望和价值观之间是否存在种族差异;2)感知数学成本与期望和价值观之间的差异在多大程度上解释了种族和性别之间成就差异的年度变化。这项研究评估了2,338名6至12年级的黑人(39.4%)和白人(60.6%)青少年,大约一半是女孩(47.8%)(M = 14.71岁,SD = 1.93, 61.7%有资格享受免费或减价午餐)。结果表明,黑人青少年比白人同龄人认为学习数学的成本更高,但他们对数学的重视方式相似。在调整了社会经济地位和年级水平后,感知数学成本是解释黑人和白人女孩(而不是男孩)之间成绩差异的唯一动机信念。相反,对能力信念的认知解释了黑人男孩和女孩之间的成就差异。这些发现指出了采用交叉方法来理解数学动机和成绩之间关系的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Contemporary Educational Psychology
Contemporary Educational Psychology PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL-
CiteScore
16.50
自引率
3.90%
发文量
74
期刊介绍: Contemporary Educational Psychology is a scholarly journal that publishes empirical research from various parts of the world. The research aims to substantially advance, extend, or re-envision the ongoing discourse in educational psychology research and practice. To be considered for publication, manuscripts must be well-grounded in a comprehensive theoretical and empirical framework. This framework should raise critical and timely questions that educational psychology currently faces. Additionally, the questions asked should be closely related to the chosen methodological approach, and the authors should provide actionable implications for education research and practice. The journal seeks to publish manuscripts that offer cutting-edge theoretical and methodological perspectives on critical and timely education questions. The journal is abstracted and indexed in various databases, including Contents Pages in Education, Australian Educational Index, Current Contents, EBSCOhost, Education Index, ERA, PsycINFO, Sociology of Education Abstracts, PubMed/Medline, BIOSIS Previews, and others.
期刊最新文献
It’s not all about recognition and Influence: The role of communal and agentic goals and motives in science for diverse high school students Three applications of semantic network analysis to individual student think-aloud data An exploratory experiment investigating teachers’ attributional race and gender bias and the moderating effects of personal experience of racial discrimination How much active teaching should be incorporated into college course lectures to promote active learning? Self-efficacy inertia: The role of competency beliefs and academic burden in achievement
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1