Jagadis Bose’s panvitalism as intellectual history

IF 0.1 Q4 HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE INDIAN JOURNAL OF HISTORY OF SCIENCE Pub Date : 2022-02-18 DOI:10.1007/s43539-022-00032-6
Subrata Dasgupta
{"title":"Jagadis Bose’s panvitalism as intellectual history","authors":"Subrata Dasgupta","doi":"10.1007/s43539-022-00032-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>No aspect of Jagadis Chandra Bose’s science is more enigmatic than his concern with the relationship between the living and nonliving, explored from 1900 through 1902. Elsewhere this writer called this the ‘middle Bose’ period since it separated Bose the physicist (1894–1900) from Bose the plant physiologist (1903 and after). The essence of his insight developed in this brief period was formerly termed by this writer the ‘Boseian thesis’ and summarized as ‘There is no discontinuity between the living and nonliving’. However, a more nuanced examination of three key texts published by Bose in this period, along with supplemental archival documents reveals that his articulation of the relationship between the living and nonliving evolved in subtle and daring ways culminating in an expression of the doctrine of <i>panvitalism</i>. This doctrine—that life pervades all matter—is an <i>idea</i> about the natural world. Thus, examining Bose’s panvitalism takes us into the realm of <i>intellectual history</i>: the close study of the <i>meaning</i> of Bose’s <i>texts</i> in order to understand his <i>intention</i> in exploring the relationship of the living and nonliving, the <i>context</i> of his investigation and its relation to the texts, and <i>how</i> he arrived at his panvitalist doctrine. The intellectual history of Bose’s panvitalism is the subject of this paper.</p>","PeriodicalId":43899,"journal":{"name":"INDIAN JOURNAL OF HISTORY OF SCIENCE","volume":"202 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"INDIAN JOURNAL OF HISTORY OF SCIENCE","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s43539-022-00032-6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

No aspect of Jagadis Chandra Bose’s science is more enigmatic than his concern with the relationship between the living and nonliving, explored from 1900 through 1902. Elsewhere this writer called this the ‘middle Bose’ period since it separated Bose the physicist (1894–1900) from Bose the plant physiologist (1903 and after). The essence of his insight developed in this brief period was formerly termed by this writer the ‘Boseian thesis’ and summarized as ‘There is no discontinuity between the living and nonliving’. However, a more nuanced examination of three key texts published by Bose in this period, along with supplemental archival documents reveals that his articulation of the relationship between the living and nonliving evolved in subtle and daring ways culminating in an expression of the doctrine of panvitalism. This doctrine—that life pervades all matter—is an idea about the natural world. Thus, examining Bose’s panvitalism takes us into the realm of intellectual history: the close study of the meaning of Bose’s texts in order to understand his intention in exploring the relationship of the living and nonliving, the context of his investigation and its relation to the texts, and how he arrived at his panvitalist doctrine. The intellectual history of Bose’s panvitalism is the subject of this paper.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Jagadis Bose的泛生机论作为思想史
从1900年到1902年,贾加迪斯·钱德拉·玻色对生物和非生物之间关系的研究,是他科学研究中最神秘的部分。在其他地方,笔者称这一时期为“玻色中期”,因为它将玻色作为物理学家(1894-1900)与玻色作为植物生理学家(1903年及之后)分开了。他在这段短暂的时期内形成的洞察力的本质,曾被笔者称为“波色理论”,并总结为“生命与非生命之间没有不连续”。然而,对玻色在这一时期出版的三本关键文本以及补充的档案文件进行更细致入微的考察,就会发现他对生命与非生命之间关系的阐述以微妙而大胆的方式发展,最终达到了对泛生命论教义的表达。这一学说——生命遍及所有物质——是一种关于自然界的观点。因此,考察玻色的泛生命论将我们带入思想史的领域:深入研究玻色文本的意义,以理解他探索生命与非生命的关系的意图,他的研究背景及其与文本的关系,以及他是如何得出他的泛生命论学说的。本文的主题是玻色泛生机论的思想史。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
INDIAN JOURNAL OF HISTORY OF SCIENCE
INDIAN JOURNAL OF HISTORY OF SCIENCE HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
30
期刊最新文献
History of linguistic science of the Austroasiatic group of languages with special reference to the Mon-Khmer and Northern Munda languages of India: Retrospect and prospect Understanding the various scientific theories in the history of science Decision theory and probability theory: Pascal’s wager and pre-modern Indian lotteries On the calculation of the Moon’s latitude in Indian astronomy Historical perspectives of critical care in India and worldwide
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1