Comparison of Runoff Components, Water Balance, and the Parameters of Conceptual Models HBV and GR4J: Case Study of the Upper Ussuri Basin (South of Primorsky Region, Pacific Russia)

IF 0.9 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q4 WATER RESOURCES Water Resources Pub Date : 2023-11-24 DOI:10.1134/s0097807823700136
S. Yu. Lupakov, A. N. Bugaets, L. V. Gonchukov, O. V. Sokolov, N. D. Bugaets
{"title":"Comparison of Runoff Components, Water Balance, and the Parameters of Conceptual Models HBV and GR4J: Case Study of the Upper Ussuri Basin (South of Primorsky Region, Pacific Russia)","authors":"S. Yu. Lupakov, A. N. Bugaets, L. V. Gonchukov, O. V. Sokolov, N. D. Bugaets","doi":"10.1134/s0097807823700136","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Abstract</h3><p>The efficiency of runoff simulation, the values of parameters, and the dynamics of the estimated runoff components were analyzed for two conceptual hydrological models GR4J and HBV for 17 watersheds in the Upper Ussuri River (Primorsky Krai, Russia) with areas from 138 to 24 400 km<sup>2</sup>. Both models demonstrate an increase in the simulation efficiency (based on NSE criterion) with an increase in the catchment area up to 1–2 thousand km<sup>2</sup>, after which they stabilize within the interval of 0.75–0.85 for the calibration period and 0.70–0.80 for the verification period. The estimates obtained for the HBV model were 5–10% higher than those for the GR4J model. Analysis of the measured and calculated annual runoff maximums over the warm season suggests the conclusion that GR4J model is on the average 5–6% more efficient than the HBV model in calculating the maximal values of rain flood discharges. At the same time, the obtained values of the relative error BIAS demonstrate a more accurate reproduction of the annual average runoff by the HBV model. The main distinctions determining the efficiency of simulation in the study region are as follows: the method of considering the precipitation height increments within altitude belts, the specific features of the calculation of model evapotranspiration, the method for calculating the outflow from conceptual runoff-forming storages in the GR4J and HBV models.</p>","PeriodicalId":49368,"journal":{"name":"Water Resources","volume":"62 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Water Resources","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1134/s0097807823700136","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"WATER RESOURCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The efficiency of runoff simulation, the values of parameters, and the dynamics of the estimated runoff components were analyzed for two conceptual hydrological models GR4J and HBV for 17 watersheds in the Upper Ussuri River (Primorsky Krai, Russia) with areas from 138 to 24 400 km2. Both models demonstrate an increase in the simulation efficiency (based on NSE criterion) with an increase in the catchment area up to 1–2 thousand km2, after which they stabilize within the interval of 0.75–0.85 for the calibration period and 0.70–0.80 for the verification period. The estimates obtained for the HBV model were 5–10% higher than those for the GR4J model. Analysis of the measured and calculated annual runoff maximums over the warm season suggests the conclusion that GR4J model is on the average 5–6% more efficient than the HBV model in calculating the maximal values of rain flood discharges. At the same time, the obtained values of the relative error BIAS demonstrate a more accurate reproduction of the annual average runoff by the HBV model. The main distinctions determining the efficiency of simulation in the study region are as follows: the method of considering the precipitation height increments within altitude belts, the specific features of the calculation of model evapotranspiration, the method for calculating the outflow from conceptual runoff-forming storages in the GR4J and HBV models.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
径流组分、水平衡及HBV和GR4J概念模型参数的比较——以上乌苏里河流域(俄罗斯太平洋沿岸地区南部)为例
摘要采用GR4J和HBV两种概念水文模型,对乌苏里江上游(Primorsky Krai, Russia)面积为138 ~ 24400 km2的17个流域的径流模拟效率、参数值和估算径流组分的动态进行了分析。两种模式的模拟效率(基于NSE准则)都随着流域面积的增加而增加,达到1-2千km2,之后在校准期和验证期分别稳定在0.75-0.85和0.70-0.80之间。HBV模型获得的估计值比GR4J模型高5-10%。对暖季实测和计算的年径流量最大值的分析表明,在计算雨洪流量最大值方面,GR4J模型的效率平均比HBV模型高5-6%。同时,获得的相对误差BIAS值表明HBV模型更准确地再现了年平均径流。决定研究区模拟效率的主要区别在于:考虑海拔带内降水高度增量的方法、模式蒸散发计算的具体特点、GR4J和HBV模式对概念径流形成库流出量的计算方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Water Resources
Water Resources 环境科学-水资源
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
20.00%
发文量
86
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Water Resources is a journal that publishes articles on the assessment of water resources, integrated water resource use, water quality, and environmental protection. The journal covers many areas of research, including prediction of variations in continental water resources and regime; hydrophysical, hydrodynamic, hydrochemical and hydrobiological processes, environmental aspects of water quality and protection; economic, social, and legal aspects of water-resource development; and experimental methods of studies.
期刊最新文献
Evaluating Operational Performance and Sustainability of Water Supply Reservoirs in the Yesilirmak Basin, Turkey Experimental Study on Venting of Lock Exchange Turbidity Current Long-Term Dynamics of Major Ion Concentrations in the Water of Lake Teletskoe Tributaries in the Context of Biogeochemical Conditions in Their Drainage Basins The Effect of the Physicochemical Properties and the Composition of Dubna River Water on the State of the Processes of Lipid Peroxidation in Biological Systems Ionic Composition of Different Types of Natural Water Sources in the River Basins of the Crimean Mountains
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1