Avoiding a lost decade—sovereign debt workouts in the post-Covid era

IF 0.9 Q2 LAW Capital Markets Law Journal Pub Date : 2020-12-16 DOI:10.1093/cmlj/kmaa028
Buchheit L, Gulati M.
{"title":"Avoiding a lost decade—sovereign debt workouts in the post-Covid era","authors":"Buchheit L, Gulati M.","doi":"10.1093/cmlj/kmaa028","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<span><div><div>Key points</div><ul><li>All sovereign debt restructurings risk undershooting (providing <span style=\"font-style:italic;\">less</span> debt relief than is needed to restore the country to long-term sustainability) or overshooting (extracting <span style=\"font-style:italic;\">more</span> debt relief from creditors than turns out to have actually been necessary).</li><li>Of these, undershooting will be the greater risk in sovereign debt workouts in the post-Covid era. Bondholders can be expected to prefer short and shallow debt restructurings that provide near-term debt relief (time enough to sell out of sticky positions). As for the future, creditors will endorse Doris Day’s assessment—<span style=\"font-style:italic;\">que será será.</span> For their part, politicians in the debtor country may also prefer a quick restructuring that provides abundant short-term debt relief even if it complicates the life of the next administration. </li><li>The last time a systemic emerging market sovereign debt crisis was handled through a series of short and shallow debt restructurings was in the 1980s. It bequeathed to the debtor countries what is still called the Lost Decade. Can a similar fate be avoided in the decade that has just begun?</li></ul></div></span>","PeriodicalId":43720,"journal":{"name":"Capital Markets Law Journal","volume":"90 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Capital Markets Law Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/cmlj/kmaa028","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Key points
  • All sovereign debt restructurings risk undershooting (providing less debt relief than is needed to restore the country to long-term sustainability) or overshooting (extracting more debt relief from creditors than turns out to have actually been necessary).
  • Of these, undershooting will be the greater risk in sovereign debt workouts in the post-Covid era. Bondholders can be expected to prefer short and shallow debt restructurings that provide near-term debt relief (time enough to sell out of sticky positions). As for the future, creditors will endorse Doris Day’s assessment—que será será. For their part, politicians in the debtor country may also prefer a quick restructuring that provides abundant short-term debt relief even if it complicates the life of the next administration.
  • The last time a systemic emerging market sovereign debt crisis was handled through a series of short and shallow debt restructurings was in the 1980s. It bequeathed to the debtor countries what is still called the Lost Decade. Can a similar fate be avoided in the decade that has just begun?
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
避免失去的十年——在后新冠时代的主权债务重组
所有主权债务重组都面临着力度不足(提供的债务减免比恢复国家长期可持续性所需的要少)或力度过大(从债权人那里获得的债务减免比实际需要的要多)的风险。其中,后疫情时代主权债务重组面临的更大风险将是表现不佳。可以预期债券持有人更倾向于短期和轻微的债务重组,以提供短期债务减免(有足够的时间抛售粘性头寸)。至于未来,债权人将支持多丽丝·戴(Doris Day)的评估式服务服务。对债务国的政客来说,他们可能也更喜欢快速重组,以提供大量的短期债务减免,即使这会使下届政府的生活变得复杂。上一次通过一系列短期和浅层债务重组来应对系统性新兴市场主权债务危机是在上世纪80年代。它留给债务国的是至今仍被称为“失去的十年”的时期。在刚刚开始的10年里,我们能避免类似的命运吗?
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
21
期刊介绍: This journal is essential for all serious capital markets practitioners and for academics with an interest in this growing field around the World. It is the first periodical to focus entirely on aspects related to capital markets for lawyers and covers all of the fields within this practice area: Debt; Derivatives; Equity; High Yield Products; Securitisation; and Repackaging. With an international perspective, each issue covers articles and news relevant to the financial centres in the US, Europe and Asia. The journal provides a mix of thoughtful and in-depth consideration of the law and practice of capital markets through analytical articles on topical issues written by leading practitioners and academics in the international arena. There are also articles on matters of best practice and opinion on legal and practice developments from around the world. In particular the journal offers: • Unique specialist coverage of international capital markets practice • High level of analysis for experienced lawyers and academics • Team of internationally respected editors from leading centres in the US, Europe and Asia • Quality of articles assured through peer review system.
期刊最新文献
A critical evaluation of Central Bank Digital Currencies (CBDCs): payments’ final frontier? Can GDP-linked debt be the answer to sovereign debt crises? Auditors report and the German Capital Markets Model Case Act (KapMuG)—legal consequences for EY in the Wirecard scandal Editors’ Note Do we really need a ‘perfectly reasonable investor’ within MAR?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1