Assessment Framework for the Identification and Evaluation of Main Features for Distributed Usage Control Solutions

IF 3 4区 计算机科学 Q2 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS ACM Transactions on Privacy and Security Pub Date : 2022-11-11 DOI:https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3561511
Gonzalo Gil, Aitor Arnaiz, Mariví Higuero, Francisco Javier Diez
{"title":"Assessment Framework for the Identification and Evaluation of Main Features for Distributed Usage Control Solutions","authors":"Gonzalo Gil, Aitor Arnaiz, Mariví Higuero, Francisco Javier Diez","doi":"https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3561511","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Data exchange between organizations is becoming an increasingly significant issue due to the great opportunities it presents. However, there is great reluctance to share if data sovereignty is not provided. Providing it calls for not only access control but also usage control implemented in distributed systems. Access control is a research field where there has been a great deal of work, but usage control, especially implemented in distributed systems as Distributed Usage Control (DUC), is a very new field of research that presents great challenges. Moreover, little is known about what challenges must really be faced and how they must be addressed. This is evidenced by the fact that existing research has focused non-specifically on different features of DUC, which are not formalized. Therefore, the path for the development of DUC solutions is unclear and it is difficult to analyze the scope of data sovereignty attained by the wide range of DUC solutions. In this context, this article is based on an initial in-depth analysis of DUC related work. In it, the challenges posed by DUC in terms of data sovereignty and the features that must be provided to address them are identified and analyzed for the first time. Based on these features, an initial DUC framework is proposed to assess in a practical and unified way the extent to which DUC solutions provide data sovereignty. Finally, the assessment framework is applied to compare the scopes of the most widespread DUC solutions and identify their limitations.</p>","PeriodicalId":56050,"journal":{"name":"ACM Transactions on Privacy and Security","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACM Transactions on Privacy and Security","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3561511","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Data exchange between organizations is becoming an increasingly significant issue due to the great opportunities it presents. However, there is great reluctance to share if data sovereignty is not provided. Providing it calls for not only access control but also usage control implemented in distributed systems. Access control is a research field where there has been a great deal of work, but usage control, especially implemented in distributed systems as Distributed Usage Control (DUC), is a very new field of research that presents great challenges. Moreover, little is known about what challenges must really be faced and how they must be addressed. This is evidenced by the fact that existing research has focused non-specifically on different features of DUC, which are not formalized. Therefore, the path for the development of DUC solutions is unclear and it is difficult to analyze the scope of data sovereignty attained by the wide range of DUC solutions. In this context, this article is based on an initial in-depth analysis of DUC related work. In it, the challenges posed by DUC in terms of data sovereignty and the features that must be provided to address them are identified and analyzed for the first time. Based on these features, an initial DUC framework is proposed to assess in a practical and unified way the extent to which DUC solutions provide data sovereignty. Finally, the assessment framework is applied to compare the scopes of the most widespread DUC solutions and identify their limitations.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
用于识别和评估分布式使用控制解决方案主要特性的评估框架
组织之间的数据交换正成为一个日益重要的问题,因为它提供了巨大的机会。然而,如果没有提供数据主权,人们就非常不愿意共享。提供它不仅需要访问控制,还需要在分布式系统中实现使用控制。访问控制是一个已经做了大量工作的研究领域,而使用控制,特别是在分布式系统中实现的分布式使用控制(DUC)是一个非常新的研究领域,提出了很大的挑战。此外,对于必须真正面对哪些挑战以及如何应对这些挑战,人们知之甚少。事实证明,现有的研究没有明确地关注DUC的不同特征,这些特征没有形式化。因此,DUC解决方案的发展路径是不明确的,并且很难分析广泛的DUC解决方案所获得的数据主权范围。在此背景下,本文在初步深入分析DUC相关工作的基础上。在其中,DUC在数据主权方面带来的挑战以及必须提供的功能首次被识别和分析。基于这些特征,提出了一个初始DUC框架,以实用和统一的方式评估DUC解决方案提供数据主权的程度。最后,应用评估框架来比较最广泛的DUC解决方案的范围,并确定其局限性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
ACM Transactions on Privacy and Security
ACM Transactions on Privacy and Security Computer Science-General Computer Science
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
52
期刊介绍: ACM Transactions on Privacy and Security (TOPS) (formerly known as TISSEC) publishes high-quality research results in the fields of information and system security and privacy. Studies addressing all aspects of these fields are welcomed, ranging from technologies, to systems and applications, to the crafting of policies.
期刊最新文献
Flexichain: Flexible Payment Channel Network to Defend Against Channel Exhaustion Attack SPArch: A Hardware-oriented Sketch-based Architecture for High-speed Network Flow Measurements VeriBin: A Malware Authorship Verification Approach for APT Tracking through Explainable and Functionality-Debiasing Adversarial Representation Learning CBAs: Character-level Backdoor Attacks against Chinese Pre-trained Language Models PEBASI: A Privacy preserving, Efficient Biometric Authentication Scheme based on Irises
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1