Security Analysis of the Consumer Remote SIM Provisioning Protocol

IF 3 4区 计算机科学 Q2 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS ACM Transactions on Privacy and Security Pub Date : 2024-05-06 DOI:10.1145/3663761
Abu Shohel Ahmed, Aleksi Peltonen, Mohit Sethi, Tuomas Aura
{"title":"Security Analysis of the Consumer Remote SIM Provisioning Protocol","authors":"Abu Shohel Ahmed, Aleksi Peltonen, Mohit Sethi, Tuomas Aura","doi":"10.1145/3663761","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Remote SIM provisioning (RSP) for consumer devices is the protocol specified by the GSM Association for downloading SIM profiles into a secure element in a mobile device. The process is commonly known as eSIM, and it is expected to replace removable SIM cards. The security of the protocol is critical because the profile includes the credentials with which the mobile device will authenticate to the mobile network. In this paper, we present a formal security analysis of the consumer RSP protocol. We model the multi-party protocol in applied pi calculus, define formal security goals, and verify them in ProVerif. The analysis shows that the consumer RSP protocol protects against a network adversary when all the intended participants are honest. However, we also model the protocol in realistic partial compromise scenarios where the adversary controls a legitimate participant or communication channel. The security failures in the partial compromise scenarios reveal weaknesses in the protocol design. The most important observation is that the security of RSP depends unnecessarily on it being encapsulated in a TLS tunnel. Also, the lack of pre-established identifiers means that a compromised download server anywhere in the world or a compromised secure element can be used for attacks against RSP between honest participants. Additionally, the lack of reliable methods for verifying user intent can lead to serious security failures. Based on the findings, we recommend practical improvements to RSP implementations, future versions of the specification, and mobile operator processes to increase the robustness of eSIM security.</p>","PeriodicalId":56050,"journal":{"name":"ACM Transactions on Privacy and Security","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACM Transactions on Privacy and Security","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3663761","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Remote SIM provisioning (RSP) for consumer devices is the protocol specified by the GSM Association for downloading SIM profiles into a secure element in a mobile device. The process is commonly known as eSIM, and it is expected to replace removable SIM cards. The security of the protocol is critical because the profile includes the credentials with which the mobile device will authenticate to the mobile network. In this paper, we present a formal security analysis of the consumer RSP protocol. We model the multi-party protocol in applied pi calculus, define formal security goals, and verify them in ProVerif. The analysis shows that the consumer RSP protocol protects against a network adversary when all the intended participants are honest. However, we also model the protocol in realistic partial compromise scenarios where the adversary controls a legitimate participant or communication channel. The security failures in the partial compromise scenarios reveal weaknesses in the protocol design. The most important observation is that the security of RSP depends unnecessarily on it being encapsulated in a TLS tunnel. Also, the lack of pre-established identifiers means that a compromised download server anywhere in the world or a compromised secure element can be used for attacks against RSP between honest participants. Additionally, the lack of reliable methods for verifying user intent can lead to serious security failures. Based on the findings, we recommend practical improvements to RSP implementations, future versions of the specification, and mobile operator processes to increase the robustness of eSIM security.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
消费者远程 SIM 卡供应协议的安全分析
消费类设备的远程 SIM 卡供应(RSP)是 GSM 协会指定的协议,用于将 SIM 卡配置文件下载到移动设备的安全元件中。这一过程通常被称为 eSIM,有望取代可移动 SIM 卡。该协议的安全性至关重要,因为配置文件包括移动设备验证移动网络的凭证。在本文中,我们对消费者 RSP 协议进行了正式的安全分析。我们用应用 pi 微积分为多方协议建模,定义了形式安全目标,并用 ProVerif 验证了这些目标。分析表明,当所有预期参与者都是诚实的时候,消费者 RSP 协议可以抵御网络对手。不过,我们也在现实的部分妥协场景中对该协议进行了建模,在这种场景中,对手控制了一个合法参与者或通信通道。部分妥协场景中的安全失效揭示了协议设计中的弱点。最重要的一点是,RSP 的安全性不必要地依赖于封装在 TLS 隧道中。而且,由于缺乏预先确定的标识符,世界上任何地方的被入侵下载服务器或被入侵的安全元件都可能被用来攻击诚实参与者之间的 RSP。此外,缺乏验证用户意图的可靠方法也会导致严重的安全故障。根据研究结果,我们建议对 RSP 实现、未来版本的规范和移动运营商流程进行实际改进,以提高 eSIM 安全的稳健性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
ACM Transactions on Privacy and Security
ACM Transactions on Privacy and Security Computer Science-General Computer Science
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
52
期刊介绍: ACM Transactions on Privacy and Security (TOPS) (formerly known as TISSEC) publishes high-quality research results in the fields of information and system security and privacy. Studies addressing all aspects of these fields are welcomed, ranging from technologies, to systems and applications, to the crafting of policies.
期刊最新文献
Flexichain: Flexible Payment Channel Network to Defend Against Channel Exhaustion Attack SPArch: A Hardware-oriented Sketch-based Architecture for High-speed Network Flow Measurements VeriBin: A Malware Authorship Verification Approach for APT Tracking through Explainable and Functionality-Debiasing Adversarial Representation Learning CBAs: Character-level Backdoor Attacks against Chinese Pre-trained Language Models PEBASI: A Privacy preserving, Efficient Biometric Authentication Scheme based on Irises
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1