David J. Gregory, Feifei Han, Peng Li, Marina Gritsenko, Jennifer Kyle, Frank E. Riley, Deborah Chavez, Vania Yotova, Renata H.M. Sindeaux, Mohamed B. F. Hawash, Fengyun Xu, Li-Yuan Hung, Douglas L. Hayden, Ron G. Tompkins, Robert E. Lanford, Lester Kobzik, Judith Hellman, Jonathan M. Jacobs, Luis B. Barreiro, Wenzhong Xiao, H. Shaw Warren
{"title":"Multi-Omic blood analysis reveals differences in innate inflammatory sensitivity between species","authors":"David J. Gregory, Feifei Han, Peng Li, Marina Gritsenko, Jennifer Kyle, Frank E. Riley, Deborah Chavez, Vania Yotova, Renata H.M. Sindeaux, Mohamed B. F. Hawash, Fengyun Xu, Li-Yuan Hung, Douglas L. Hayden, Ron G. Tompkins, Robert E. Lanford, Lester Kobzik, Judith Hellman, Jonathan M. Jacobs, Luis B. Barreiro, Wenzhong Xiao, H. Shaw Warren","doi":"10.1101/2023.11.30.23299243","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Vertebrates differ greatly in responses to pro-inflammatory agonists such as bacterial lipopolysaccharide (LPS), complicating use of animal models to study human sepsis or inflammatory disorders. We compared transcriptomes of resting and LPS-exposed blood from six LPS-sensitive species (rabbit, pig, sheep, cow, chimpanzee, human) and four LPS-resilient species (mice, rats, baboon, rhesus), as well as plasma proteomes and lipidomes. Unexpectedly, at baseline, sensitive species already had enhanced expression of LPS-responsive genes relative to resilient species. After LPS stimulation, maximally different genes in resilient species included genes that detoxify LPS, diminish bacterial growth, discriminate sepsis from SIRS, and play roles in autophagy and apoptosis. The findings reveal the molecular landscape of species differences in inflammation, and may inform better selection of species for pre-clinical models.","PeriodicalId":501527,"journal":{"name":"medRxiv - Allergy and Immunology","volume":"12 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"medRxiv - Allergy and Immunology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.11.30.23299243","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Vertebrates differ greatly in responses to pro-inflammatory agonists such as bacterial lipopolysaccharide (LPS), complicating use of animal models to study human sepsis or inflammatory disorders. We compared transcriptomes of resting and LPS-exposed blood from six LPS-sensitive species (rabbit, pig, sheep, cow, chimpanzee, human) and four LPS-resilient species (mice, rats, baboon, rhesus), as well as plasma proteomes and lipidomes. Unexpectedly, at baseline, sensitive species already had enhanced expression of LPS-responsive genes relative to resilient species. After LPS stimulation, maximally different genes in resilient species included genes that detoxify LPS, diminish bacterial growth, discriminate sepsis from SIRS, and play roles in autophagy and apoptosis. The findings reveal the molecular landscape of species differences in inflammation, and may inform better selection of species for pre-clinical models.