The Controversy over European Inflation in 1500–1700: Precious Metals or Population? The English Evidence

IF 1.5 4区 经济学 Q2 ECONOMICS Open Economies Review Pub Date : 2023-12-06 DOI:10.1007/s11079-023-09743-4
Anthony Edo, Jacques Melitz
{"title":"The Controversy over European Inflation in 1500–1700: Precious Metals or Population? The English Evidence","authors":"Anthony Edo, Jacques Melitz","doi":"10.1007/s11079-023-09743-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Economists and some economic historians dismiss the populationist hypothesis about responsibility of population growth for the European <i>“Price Revolution”</i>. They attribute the inflation instead to inflow of silver following discovery of the Americas. Based on English evidence in 1500–1700, we show that this dismissal of the populationist position flies in the face of the evidence. Further, whatever the weaknesses of past defenses of the populationist stand, it can be easily framed on a sound economic basis. We also examine critically the monetarist explanation of the Price Revolution. Both theses are jointly important and compatible.</p>","PeriodicalId":46980,"journal":{"name":"Open Economies Review","volume":"42 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Open Economies Review","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11079-023-09743-4","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Economists and some economic historians dismiss the populationist hypothesis about responsibility of population growth for the European “Price Revolution”. They attribute the inflation instead to inflow of silver following discovery of the Americas. Based on English evidence in 1500–1700, we show that this dismissal of the populationist position flies in the face of the evidence. Further, whatever the weaknesses of past defenses of the populationist stand, it can be easily framed on a sound economic basis. We also examine critically the monetarist explanation of the Price Revolution. Both theses are jointly important and compatible.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
1500-1700 年欧洲通货膨胀之争:贵金属还是人口?英国的证据
经济学家和一些经济史学家否定了人口主义关于人口增长对欧洲 "价格革命 "负有责任的假设。他们将通货膨胀归咎于美洲发现后白银的流入。根据 1500-1700 年英国的证据,我们表明这种对人口主义立场的否定是不符合证据的。此外,无论过去对人口论立场的辩护有什么弱点,它都可以很容易地建立在合理的经济基础之上。我们还批判性地研究了货币主义对价格革命的解释。这两个论点都很重要,而且相互兼容。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
16.70%
发文量
40
期刊介绍: The topics covered in Open Economies Review include, but are not limited to, models and applications of (1) trade flows, (2) commercial policy, (3) adjustment mechanism to external imbalances, (4) exchange rate movements, (5) alternative monetary regimes, (6) real and financial integration, (7) monetary union, (8) economic development and (9) external debt. Open Economies Review welcomes original manuscripts, both theoretical and empirical, dealing with international economic issues or national economic issues that have transnational relevance. Furthermore, Open Economies Review solicits contributions bearing on specific events on important branches of the literature. Open Economies Review is open to any and all contributions, without preferences for any particular viewpoint or school of thought. Open Economies Review encourages interdisciplinary communication and interaction among researchers in the vast area of international and transnational economics. Authors will be expected to meet the scientific standards prevailing in their respective fields, and empirical findings must be reproducible. Regardless of degree of complexity and specificity, authors are expected to write an introduction, setting forth the nature of their research and the significance of their findings, in a manner accessible to researchers in other disciplines. Officially cited as: Open Econ Rev
期刊最新文献
EU Sanctions on Russia and Implications for a Small Open Economy: The Case of Cyprus Responses of Foreign Exchange Market to External Shocks: What Makes Differences? Testing for Consumer Risk-Pooling in the Open Economy – further Results Assessing Digital Leadership: Is the EU Losing Out to the US? Macroprudential Policies and Global Banking
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1