EU Sanctions on Russia and Implications for a Small Open Economy: The Case of Cyprus

IF 1.5 4区 经济学 Q2 ECONOMICS Open Economies Review Pub Date : 2024-09-05 DOI:10.1007/s11079-024-09786-1
Konstantinos Mavrigiannakis, Stelios Sakkas
{"title":"EU Sanctions on Russia and Implications for a Small Open Economy: The Case of Cyprus","authors":"Konstantinos Mavrigiannakis, Stelios Sakkas","doi":"10.1007/s11079-024-09786-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This paper aims at assessing quantitatively the macroeconomic impact of EU sanctions against Russia for the economy of Cyprus. To this end, we use a medium-scale micro-founded DSGE model of a small open economy participating in a currency union like the euro area calibrated to the economy of Cyprus. The model features two sectors of production, namely the tradable and the non-tradable one. In this model, EU sanctions influence the sanctioning economy (i.e. Cyprus) through a mix of foreign shocks that hit in principle the tradable sector. In particular, to mimic the economic environment (namely, how all this started in 2022), we analyze first the effects of an energy-type shock modeled as a standard cost-push shock on imported goods. In turn, we add to this economic environment the impact of policy reactions like EU sanctions against Russia. In this context and given the strong trade ties of Cyprus with Russia, we model sanctions as two simultaneous negative exogenous shocks, that is, a temporary decrease in the exported goods, reflecting primarily reductions observed in tourism and financial services, and in inward foreign direct investment (FDI). Contrary to the mild impacts reported in the literature for the majority of EU countries we find non negligible negative effects for the economy of Cyprus which range from 1.24% to 3.13% in terms of average output loss in the short run. Given Cyprus’s vulnerable external position we show that the impact of sanctions depends crucially on the degree of tightening financing conditions which are likely to hit particularly more countries with high initial current account deficits and debt stocks.</p>","PeriodicalId":46980,"journal":{"name":"Open Economies Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Open Economies Review","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11079-024-09786-1","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper aims at assessing quantitatively the macroeconomic impact of EU sanctions against Russia for the economy of Cyprus. To this end, we use a medium-scale micro-founded DSGE model of a small open economy participating in a currency union like the euro area calibrated to the economy of Cyprus. The model features two sectors of production, namely the tradable and the non-tradable one. In this model, EU sanctions influence the sanctioning economy (i.e. Cyprus) through a mix of foreign shocks that hit in principle the tradable sector. In particular, to mimic the economic environment (namely, how all this started in 2022), we analyze first the effects of an energy-type shock modeled as a standard cost-push shock on imported goods. In turn, we add to this economic environment the impact of policy reactions like EU sanctions against Russia. In this context and given the strong trade ties of Cyprus with Russia, we model sanctions as two simultaneous negative exogenous shocks, that is, a temporary decrease in the exported goods, reflecting primarily reductions observed in tourism and financial services, and in inward foreign direct investment (FDI). Contrary to the mild impacts reported in the literature for the majority of EU countries we find non negligible negative effects for the economy of Cyprus which range from 1.24% to 3.13% in terms of average output loss in the short run. Given Cyprus’s vulnerable external position we show that the impact of sanctions depends crucially on the degree of tightening financing conditions which are likely to hit particularly more countries with high initial current account deficits and debt stocks.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
欧盟对俄罗斯的制裁及其对小型开放经济体的影响:塞浦路斯案例
本文旨在定量评估欧盟对俄罗斯的制裁对塞浦路斯经济的宏观经济影响。为此,我们使用了一个中等规模的微观 DSGE 模型,该模型是一个参与欧元区等货币联盟的小型开放经济体,以塞浦路斯经济为校准对象。该模型包含两个生产部门,即贸易部门和非贸易部门。在该模型中,欧盟制裁通过一系列外国冲击对制裁经济体(即塞浦路斯)产生影响,这些冲击原则上打击可贸易部门。特别是,为了模拟经济环境(即所有这一切是如何在 2022 年开始的),我们首先分析了能源类冲击的影响,该冲击被模拟为对进口商品的标准成本推动冲击。在此基础上,我们再分析欧盟制裁俄罗斯等政策反应对经济环境的影响。在此背景下,考虑到塞浦路斯与俄罗斯的紧密贸易关系,我们将制裁模拟为两个同时发生的负面外生冲击,即出口商品的暂时减少,这主要反映了旅游业和金融服务业以及外来直接投资(FDI)的减少。与文献报道的大多数欧盟国家受到的轻微影响相反,我们发现塞浦路斯经济受到的负面影响不容忽视,短期内平均产出损失从 1.24% 到 3.13% 不等。鉴于塞浦路斯脆弱的外部地位,我们发现制裁的影响主要取决于融资条件的收紧程度,而融资条件的收紧可能会对更多初始经常账户赤字和债务存量较高的国家造成冲击。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
16.70%
发文量
40
期刊介绍: The topics covered in Open Economies Review include, but are not limited to, models and applications of (1) trade flows, (2) commercial policy, (3) adjustment mechanism to external imbalances, (4) exchange rate movements, (5) alternative monetary regimes, (6) real and financial integration, (7) monetary union, (8) economic development and (9) external debt. Open Economies Review welcomes original manuscripts, both theoretical and empirical, dealing with international economic issues or national economic issues that have transnational relevance. Furthermore, Open Economies Review solicits contributions bearing on specific events on important branches of the literature. Open Economies Review is open to any and all contributions, without preferences for any particular viewpoint or school of thought. Open Economies Review encourages interdisciplinary communication and interaction among researchers in the vast area of international and transnational economics. Authors will be expected to meet the scientific standards prevailing in their respective fields, and empirical findings must be reproducible. Regardless of degree of complexity and specificity, authors are expected to write an introduction, setting forth the nature of their research and the significance of their findings, in a manner accessible to researchers in other disciplines. Officially cited as: Open Econ Rev
期刊最新文献
EU Sanctions on Russia and Implications for a Small Open Economy: The Case of Cyprus Responses of Foreign Exchange Market to External Shocks: What Makes Differences? Testing for Consumer Risk-Pooling in the Open Economy – further Results Stock Market Uncertainty and Business Optimism in Major Emerging Economies Assessing Digital Leadership: Is the EU Losing Out to the US?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1