Expanding the scope of grammatical variation: towards a comprehensive account of genitive variation across registers

IF 0.9 2区 文学 0 LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS English Language & Linguistics Pub Date : 2023-12-07 DOI:10.1017/s1360674323000497
DOUGLAS BIBER, BENEDIKT SZMRECSANYI, RANDI REPPEN, TOVE LARSSON
{"title":"Expanding the scope of grammatical variation: towards a comprehensive account of genitive variation across registers","authors":"DOUGLAS BIBER, BENEDIKT SZMRECSANYI, RANDI REPPEN, TOVE LARSSON","doi":"10.1017/s1360674323000497","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Most studies of genitive variation in English have considered only the choice of two variants (<span>'s</span> versus <span>of</span>), based on analysis of only tokens that are judged to be interchangeable. We argue in the present article that research on genitive variation can be usefully extended in both respects: including premodifying nouns as a third variant; and attempting to account for <span>all</span> tokens of the genitive. In addition, we extend the scope of analysis to explore the possibility of contextual constraints having different importance in different registers.</p><p>First, we carry out a text-linguistic analysis comparing the rates of genitive variants in texts from three registers (conversation, newspaper reports, academic articles), showing that genitives overall are much more frequent in written registers, with the premodifying noun variant being especially frequent. Then, a variationist analysis is undertaken to account for the choice of genitive variant in particular contexts and registers. A total of 3,425 genitive tokens were coded for ten contextual characteristics (e.g. length of the Modifying NP, semantic category of the Modifying noun and the Head noun, final sibilancy of the Modifying noun). Statistical analyses with random forests and conditional inference trees are triangulated, showing how contextual factors interact in predicting the use of each genitive variant – and how patterns of variation differ across registers.</p>","PeriodicalId":45748,"journal":{"name":"English Language & Linguistics","volume":"18 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"English Language & Linguistics","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/s1360674323000497","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Most studies of genitive variation in English have considered only the choice of two variants ('s versus of), based on analysis of only tokens that are judged to be interchangeable. We argue in the present article that research on genitive variation can be usefully extended in both respects: including premodifying nouns as a third variant; and attempting to account for all tokens of the genitive. In addition, we extend the scope of analysis to explore the possibility of contextual constraints having different importance in different registers.

First, we carry out a text-linguistic analysis comparing the rates of genitive variants in texts from three registers (conversation, newspaper reports, academic articles), showing that genitives overall are much more frequent in written registers, with the premodifying noun variant being especially frequent. Then, a variationist analysis is undertaken to account for the choice of genitive variant in particular contexts and registers. A total of 3,425 genitive tokens were coded for ten contextual characteristics (e.g. length of the Modifying NP, semantic category of the Modifying noun and the Head noun, final sibilancy of the Modifying noun). Statistical analyses with random forests and conditional inference trees are triangulated, showing how contextual factors interact in predicting the use of each genitive variant – and how patterns of variation differ across registers.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
扩大语法变异的范围:实现对跨语域属词变异的全面说明
大多数关于英语属格变异的研究都只考虑了两种变体('s 与 of)的选择,而且只分析了被判定为可以互换的词素。本文认为,属格变异的研究可以在以下两个方面进行有益的扩展:将前置修饰名词作为第三种变体;尝试对属格的所有标记进行解释。首先,我们进行了文本语言学分析,比较了三种语域(对话、报纸报道、学术文章)文本中属格变体的出现率,结果表明属格变体在书面语域中的出现率要高得多,而前修饰名词变体的出现率尤其高。然后,我们进行了变体分析,以解释在特定语境和语域中选择属格变体的原因。共对 3,425 个属格标记进行了编码,涉及十个语境特征(如修饰 NP 的长度、修饰名词和头部名词的语义类别、修饰名词的末尾咝音)。使用随机森林和条件推理树进行三角统计分析,显示了语境因素在预测每个属格变体的使用时如何相互作用,以及不同语域的变异模式有何不同。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
10.00%
发文量
46
期刊介绍: English Language and Linguistics, published twice a year, is an international journal which focuses on the description of the English language within the framework of contemporary linguistics. The journal is concerned equally with the synchronic and the diachronic aspects of English language studies and publishes articles of the highest quality which make a substantial contribution to our understanding of the structure and development of the English language and which are informed by a knowledge and appreciation of linguistic theory. English Language and Linguistics carries articles and short discussion papers or squibs on all core aspects of English, from its beginnings to the present day, including syntax, morphology, phonology, semantics, pragmatics, corpus linguistics and lexis.
期刊最新文献
Loan verb accommodation: a comparison of Old Norse and French in Middle English ‘When intuitions (don't) fail’: combining syntax and sociolinguistics in the analysis of Scots Morphosyntactic agreement in English: does it help the listener in noise? An exploratory investigation of functional variation in South Asian online Englishes A topic which I want to know more about – preposition placement in finite WH-relative clauses in World Englishes
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1