PARTICIPANT SELF-REFERENCE, UNDER-DETERMINATION, GENERALISATION, VAGUENESS, AND AMBIGUITY IN POLITICAL DISCOURSE: A CONTRASTIVE ANALYSIS OF PARLIAMENTARY DEBATE AND TWITTER USAGES*

IF 0.4 3区 文学 N/A LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS STUDIA LINGUISTICA Pub Date : 2023-12-07 DOI:10.1111/stul.12226
Neus Nogué-Serrano
{"title":"PARTICIPANT SELF-REFERENCE, UNDER-DETERMINATION, GENERALISATION, VAGUENESS, AND AMBIGUITY IN POLITICAL DISCOURSE: A CONTRASTIVE ANALYSIS OF PARLIAMENTARY DEBATE AND TWITTER USAGES*","authors":"Neus Nogué-Serrano","doi":"10.1111/stul.12226","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The main aim of this chapter is to analyse under-determination, generalisation, vagueness, and ambiguity in the speaker's self-reference strategies used in Catalan parliamentary debate and Twitter. Parliaments are one of the main arenas where politicians develop their activity. On the other hand, Twitter allows politicians to build their own public image and to be in touch with voters, and citizens in general, in a more direct way. The theoretical background of the analysis includes the classical studies on deixis and on person deixis in Catalan; Goffman (1981)'s participation frameworks; functional linguistics and the ethnography of communication, and Twitter communication analysis.","PeriodicalId":46179,"journal":{"name":"STUDIA LINGUISTICA","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"STUDIA LINGUISTICA","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/stul.12226","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"N/A","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The main aim of this chapter is to analyse under-determination, generalisation, vagueness, and ambiguity in the speaker's self-reference strategies used in Catalan parliamentary debate and Twitter. Parliaments are one of the main arenas where politicians develop their activity. On the other hand, Twitter allows politicians to build their own public image and to be in touch with voters, and citizens in general, in a more direct way. The theoretical background of the analysis includes the classical studies on deixis and on person deixis in Catalan; Goffman (1981)'s participation frameworks; functional linguistics and the ethnography of communication, and Twitter communication analysis.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
政治话语中的参与者自述、欠确定性、概括性、模糊性和模棱两可:对议会辩论和微博使用的对比分析*
本章的主要目的是分析加泰罗尼亚议会辩论和推特中发言者自我参照策略中的欠确定性、概括性、模糊性和含糊性。议会是政治家开展活动的主要舞台之一。另一方面,Twitter 使政治家们能够树立自己的公众形象,并以更直接的方式与选民和一般公民保持联系。分析的理论背景包括对加泰罗尼亚语中 deixis 和 person deixis 的经典研究、Goffman(1981 年)的参与框架、功能语言学和传播民族学以及 Twitter 传播分析。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
STUDIA LINGUISTICA
STUDIA LINGUISTICA LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS-
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
21
期刊介绍: Studia Linguistica is committed to the publication of high quality, original papers and provides an international forum for the discussion of theoretical linguistic research, primarily within the fields of grammar, cognitive semantics and language typology. The principal aim is to open a channel of communication between researchers operating in traditionally diverse fields while continuing to focus on natural language data.
期刊最新文献
THEORETICAL A‐GRAMMATISM: THE CASE FOR AN ELIMINATIVIST MINIMALISM Verb‐echo answers in Japanese do not call for syntactic head movement: Arguments for a pragmatic account* Bottom Copy Pronunciation in Japanese Passives Syntactic Variations in Referential Metonymy On the scalarity of nu‐V constructions in Taiwan Mandarin
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1