Biomechanical and taxonomic diversity in the Early Pleistocene in East Africa: Structural analysis of a recently discovered femur shaft from Olduvai Gorge (bed I)

IF 3.1 1区 地球科学 Q1 ANTHROPOLOGY Journal of Human Evolution Pub Date : 2023-12-09 DOI:10.1016/j.jhevol.2023.103469
Julia Aramendi , Audax Mabulla , Enrique Baquedano , Manuel Domínguez-Rodrigo
{"title":"Biomechanical and taxonomic diversity in the Early Pleistocene in East Africa: Structural analysis of a recently discovered femur shaft from Olduvai Gorge (bed I)","authors":"Julia Aramendi ,&nbsp;Audax Mabulla ,&nbsp;Enrique Baquedano ,&nbsp;Manuel Domínguez-Rodrigo","doi":"10.1016/j.jhevol.2023.103469","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Recent Plio-Pleistocene hominin findings have revealed the complexity of human evolutionary history and the difficulties involved in its interpretation. Moreover, the study of hominin long bone remains is particularly problematic, since it commonly depends on the analysis of fragmentary skeletal elements that in many cases are merely represented by small diaphyseal portions and appear in an isolated fashion in the fossil record. Nevertheless, the study of the postcranial skeleton is particularly important to ascertain locomotor patterns. Here we report on the discovery of a robust hominin femoral fragment (OH 84) at the site of Amin Mturi Korongo dated to 1.84 Ma (Olduvai Bed I). External anatomy and internal bone structure of OH 84 were analyzed and compared with previously published data for modern humans and chimpanzees, as well as for <em>Australopithecus</em>, <em>Paranthropus</em> and <em>Homo</em> specimens ranging from the Late Pliocene to Late Pleistocene. Biomechanical analyses based on transverse cross-sections and the comparison of OH 84 with another robust Olduvai specimen (OH 80) suggest that OH 84 might be tentatively allocated to <em>Paranthropus boisei</em>. More importantly, the identification of a unique combination of traits in OH 84 could indicate both terrestrial bipedalism and an arboreal component in the locomotor repertoire of this individual. If interpreted correctly, OH 84 could thus add to the already mounting evidence of substantial locomotor diversity among Early Pleistocene hominins. Likewise, our results also highlight the difficulties in accurately interpreting the link between form and function in the human fossil record based on fragmentary remains, and ultimately in distinguishing between coeval hominin groups due to the heterogeneous pattern of inter- and intraspecific morphological variability detected among fossil femora.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":54805,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Human Evolution","volume":"186 ","pages":"Article 103469"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0047248423001483/pdfft?md5=6c0d67c7d3490dbde4e144eb834e1b9c&pid=1-s2.0-S0047248423001483-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Human Evolution","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0047248423001483","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANTHROPOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Recent Plio-Pleistocene hominin findings have revealed the complexity of human evolutionary history and the difficulties involved in its interpretation. Moreover, the study of hominin long bone remains is particularly problematic, since it commonly depends on the analysis of fragmentary skeletal elements that in many cases are merely represented by small diaphyseal portions and appear in an isolated fashion in the fossil record. Nevertheless, the study of the postcranial skeleton is particularly important to ascertain locomotor patterns. Here we report on the discovery of a robust hominin femoral fragment (OH 84) at the site of Amin Mturi Korongo dated to 1.84 Ma (Olduvai Bed I). External anatomy and internal bone structure of OH 84 were analyzed and compared with previously published data for modern humans and chimpanzees, as well as for Australopithecus, Paranthropus and Homo specimens ranging from the Late Pliocene to Late Pleistocene. Biomechanical analyses based on transverse cross-sections and the comparison of OH 84 with another robust Olduvai specimen (OH 80) suggest that OH 84 might be tentatively allocated to Paranthropus boisei. More importantly, the identification of a unique combination of traits in OH 84 could indicate both terrestrial bipedalism and an arboreal component in the locomotor repertoire of this individual. If interpreted correctly, OH 84 could thus add to the already mounting evidence of substantial locomotor diversity among Early Pleistocene hominins. Likewise, our results also highlight the difficulties in accurately interpreting the link between form and function in the human fossil record based on fragmentary remains, and ultimately in distinguishing between coeval hominin groups due to the heterogeneous pattern of inter- and intraspecific morphological variability detected among fossil femora.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
东非早更新世的生物力学和分类多样性:对奥杜威峡谷(I 号床)最近发现的一根股骨柄的结构分析
最近对上新世-更新世类人猿的发现揭示了人类进化史的复杂性以及解释人类进化史所涉及的困难。此外,对人类长骨遗骸的研究尤其成问题,因为它通常依赖于对零碎骨骼元素的分析,而这些骨骼元素在许多情况下仅代表小的二骺部分,并以孤立的方式出现在化石记录中。然而,颅后骨骼的研究对于确定运动模式尤为重要。在此,我们报告了在阿明-姆图里-科龙戈(Amin Mturi Korongo)遗址发现的一块健壮的人科动物股骨碎片(OH 84),其年代为1.84Ma(奥杜威I号床)。研究人员对OH 84的外部解剖和内部骨骼结构进行了分析,并将其与之前公布的现代人和黑猩猩的数据,以及从上新世晚期到更新世晚期的澳大利亚人、古人类和智人标本进行了比较。根据横向截面进行的生物力学分析以及 OH 84 与另一个强壮的奥杜威标本(OH 80)的比较表明,OH 84 可暂时归属于古人类。更重要的是,在 OH 84 中发现的独特的特征组合可能表明,该个体的运动方式中既有陆地两足运动,也有树栖运动。如果解释正确的话,OH 84可能会增加早更新世人类运动多样性的证据。同样,我们的研究结果也凸显了在人类化石记录中根据零散遗骸准确解释形态与功能之间联系的困难,以及由于在化石股骨中发现的种间和种内形态变异的异质性模式而最终区分共生人类群的困难。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Human Evolution
Journal of Human Evolution 生物-进化生物学
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
15.60%
发文量
104
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Human Evolution concentrates on publishing the highest quality papers covering all aspects of human evolution. The central focus is aimed jointly at paleoanthropological work, covering human and primate fossils, and at comparative studies of living species, including both morphological and molecular evidence. These include descriptions of new discoveries, interpretative analyses of new and previously described material, and assessments of the phylogeny and paleobiology of primate species. Submissions should address issues and questions of broad interest in paleoanthropology.
期刊最新文献
A fresh look at an iconic human fossil: Virtual reconstruction of the KNM-WT 15000 cranium Ulnar morphology of Pliobates cataloniae (Pliopithecoidea: Crouzeliidae): Insights into catarrhine locomotor diversity and forelimb evolution JHE: The case for preserving a legacy journal and its community. Micro-computed tomography unveils anatomy of the oldest known plesiadapiform cranium Morphological variation of the Australopithecus afarensis maxilla
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1