Influence of aluminum powder content and powder-to-sand ratio on the physical and mechanical properties of aerated lightweight mortar

Ramesh Kumar Paikara , Tek Raj Gyawali
{"title":"Influence of aluminum powder content and powder-to-sand ratio on the physical and mechanical properties of aerated lightweight mortar","authors":"Ramesh Kumar Paikara ,&nbsp;Tek Raj Gyawali","doi":"10.1016/j.clema.2023.100213","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>After the 2015 Nepal earthquake, numerous human casualties resulted from the collapse of substantial brick walls. Concurrently, the proliferation of air pollution attributed to brick kilns has become a pressing concern in urban areas of Nepal. The dual challenge of fortifying building structures and safeguarding the urban environment necessitates innovative solutions. This paper outlines the development of aerated lightweight mortar, incorporating diverse proportions of aluminium powder and various powder-to-sand combinations, aiming to achieve a density below 1000 kg/m<sup>3</sup>. Three fundamental mixtures, characterized by water-powder ratios (W/P) of 63.3 %, 57.9 %, and 35.3 %, and total powder to sand ratios (P/S) of 0.344, 0.520, and 1.275 (by weight) were employed. The aluminium powder content ranged from 0 % to 1.2 % (by weight of cement). Standard-sized cubes and cylinders were prepared to evaluate the impact of aluminium powder on density, strength, and water absorption. From the test results, the most suitable mixture for aeration proved to be the mortar with a W/P of 35.3 % and P/S of 1.275. This formulation demonstrated a significant 50 % density reduction (&lt;1000 kg/m<sup>3</sup>) with 0.6 % aluminium powder, accompanied by a 58 % decrease in 28-day compressive strength, a 52 % drop in modulus of elasticity, and a 44 % reduction in splitting tensile strength. The study emphasized the critical role of both aluminium powder content and powder-to-sand ratio in mortar aeration. The developed aerated lightweight mortar not only enhances seismic resilience by reducing building weight but also serves as an eco-friendly alternative to traditional burnt clay bricks, mitigating environmental impact.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100254,"journal":{"name":"Cleaner Materials","volume":"10 ","pages":"Article 100213"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772397623000461/pdfft?md5=0465811a85b14b80d93d37014740faa1&pid=1-s2.0-S2772397623000461-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cleaner Materials","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772397623000461","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

After the 2015 Nepal earthquake, numerous human casualties resulted from the collapse of substantial brick walls. Concurrently, the proliferation of air pollution attributed to brick kilns has become a pressing concern in urban areas of Nepal. The dual challenge of fortifying building structures and safeguarding the urban environment necessitates innovative solutions. This paper outlines the development of aerated lightweight mortar, incorporating diverse proportions of aluminium powder and various powder-to-sand combinations, aiming to achieve a density below 1000 kg/m3. Three fundamental mixtures, characterized by water-powder ratios (W/P) of 63.3 %, 57.9 %, and 35.3 %, and total powder to sand ratios (P/S) of 0.344, 0.520, and 1.275 (by weight) were employed. The aluminium powder content ranged from 0 % to 1.2 % (by weight of cement). Standard-sized cubes and cylinders were prepared to evaluate the impact of aluminium powder on density, strength, and water absorption. From the test results, the most suitable mixture for aeration proved to be the mortar with a W/P of 35.3 % and P/S of 1.275. This formulation demonstrated a significant 50 % density reduction (<1000 kg/m3) with 0.6 % aluminium powder, accompanied by a 58 % decrease in 28-day compressive strength, a 52 % drop in modulus of elasticity, and a 44 % reduction in splitting tensile strength. The study emphasized the critical role of both aluminium powder content and powder-to-sand ratio in mortar aeration. The developed aerated lightweight mortar not only enhances seismic resilience by reducing building weight but also serves as an eco-friendly alternative to traditional burnt clay bricks, mitigating environmental impact.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
铝粉含量和粉砂比对加气轻质砂浆物理力学性能的影响
2015 年尼泊尔地震后,大量砖墙倒塌,造成大量人员伤亡。与此同时,砖窑造成的空气污染扩散也成为尼泊尔城市地区亟待解决的问题。面对加固建筑结构和保护城市环境的双重挑战,必须采取创新的解决方案。本文概述了加气轻质砂浆的开发,其中包含不同比例的铝粉和各种粉砂组合,旨在实现低于 1000 kg/m3 的密度。采用了三种基本混合物,水粉比(W/P)分别为 63.3%、57.9% 和 35.3%,总粉砂比(P/S)分别为 0.344、0.520 和 1.275(重量比)。铝粉含量范围为 0 % 至 1.2 %(按水泥重量计)。制备了标准尺寸的立方体和圆柱体,以评估铝粉对密度、强度和吸水性的影响。测试结果表明,最适合通气的混合物是 W/P 值为 35.3 %、P/S 值为 1.275 的砂浆。铝粉含量为 0.6 % 时,这种配方的密度(1000 kg/m3)明显降低了 50%,同时 28 天抗压强度降低了 58%,弹性模量下降了 52%,劈裂拉伸强度降低了 44%。该研究强调了铝粉含量和粉砂比在砂浆通气中的关键作用。所开发的加气轻质砂浆不仅能通过减轻建筑重量来增强抗震能力,还能作为传统烧制粘土砖的环保替代品,减轻对环境的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Development of biopolymer composites using lignin: A sustainable technology for fostering a green transition in the construction sector Sugarcane leaf-derived organosolv lignin as antibacterial and antioxidant agents of natural rubber composites Recirculation of construction and demolition Waste: A case study of Danish producers and demolishers Effects of the surface properties and particle size of hydrated lime on desulfurization Investigation of the influence of crushed sand on carbonation of Mortar: Physical and microstructural analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1