From chart-topper to gold record: The effects of Billboard chart popularity on RIAA gold or platinum certification of #1 R&B/Hip-Hop singles in the Pre-SoundScan and SoundScan eras, 1977–2008

IF 2 2区 社会学 0 LITERATURE Poetics Pub Date : 2023-12-09 DOI:10.1016/j.poetic.2023.101858
Vincent M. Carter
{"title":"From chart-topper to gold record: The effects of Billboard chart popularity on RIAA gold or platinum certification of #1 R&B/Hip-Hop singles in the Pre-SoundScan and SoundScan eras, 1977–2008","authors":"Vincent M. Carter","doi":"10.1016/j.poetic.2023.101858","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>The purpose of this paper was to examine the effects of genre-specific and mainstream Billboard chart popularity on RIAA gold or platinum certification of #1 R&amp;B/Hip-Hop singles in the Pre-SoundScan (1977–1992) and SoundScan (1993–2008) eras. The first aim was to determine if there were any statistically significant differences in genre-specific and mainstream popularity between singles that achieved RIAA gold or platinum certification and those that did not reach that pinnacle in both eras. The second aim assessed the relative predictive power of genre-specific and mainstream popularity on RIAA gold or platinum certification of #1 R&amp;B/Hip-Hop singles in the Pre-SoundScan and SoundScan eras while controlling for established brand.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>In this comparative assessment of the relationships between Billboard chart data and RIAA gold/platinum certification data in the Pre-SoundScan and SoundScan eras, genre-specific popularity was measured by total weeks at #1 on Billboard's R&amp;B/Hip-Hop charts and total weeks on the charts regardless of position. Mainstream popularity was evaluated with peak position on Billboard's Pop charts. The established brand construct was assessed with the artist's total prior #1 R&amp;B/Hip-Hop singles and total prior #1s by the record label.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>A Mann–Whitney U test revealed statistically significant differences in mainstream popularity between gold or platinum singles and non-gold or platinum singles in both the Pre-SoundScan and SoundScan eras. Statistically significant differences in genre-specific popularity were also observed in both periods, but not in the hypothesized direction in the SoundScan era. A binary logistic regression model demonstrated that the two popularity constructs, while controlling for established brand, predicted RIAA gold or platinum certification of #1 R&amp;B/Hip-Hop singles in both the Pre-SoundScan and SoundScan eras. The model better predicted gold or platinum certification in the Pre-SoundScan era. The most powerful predictor was mainstream popularity in both eras.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Gold or platinum certified #1 R&amp;B/Hip-Hop singles had a significantly higher peak position on the mainstream Pop charts than those not certified gold or platinum in both the Pre-SoundScan and SoundScan eras. When observing genre-specific popularity, gold or platinum singles spent significantly more total weeks on the R&amp;B/Hip-Hop charts than non-gold or platinum singles in the Pre-SoundScan era. In contrast, the reverse was observed in the SoundScan era. Mainstream popularity, as measured by peak position on the Pop charts, and genre-specific popularity, as measured by total weeks on the R&amp;B/Hip-Hop charts, were good predictors of gold or platinum certification in both the Pre-SoundScan and SoundScan eras. The model was a better predictor of RIAA gold or platinum certification in the Pre-SoundScan era, suggesting that the Billboard chart methodology in the earlier era was more aligned with the RIAA auditing process than the SoundScan era methodology. Findings also raise questions about whether the initial exclusion of several African American independent retailers, who were generally the primary source for sales data in the Pre-SoundScan era, reduced the validity of SoundScan sales data. In other words, did the SoundScan data measure what it intended to measure, which was the popularity of R&amp;B/Hip-Hop singles among the target audience of that genre? Future research should examine how the transition to SoundScan may have contributed to redefining the target audience for R&amp;B/Hip-Hop music, impacted the quantity and quality of R&amp;B/Hip-Hop music available to the public, and the effects of those outcomes on the broader culture and society.</p></div><div><h3>Areas of Interest</h3><p>Recording industry, organizations, stratification, race and ethnic relations, medical sociology, political sociology, quantitative and qualitative methods.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":47900,"journal":{"name":"Poetics","volume":"102 ","pages":"Article 101858"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304422X23000980/pdfft?md5=342d9b885930f88849dcbfcae84bef5e&pid=1-s2.0-S0304422X23000980-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Poetics","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304422X23000980","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LITERATURE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

The purpose of this paper was to examine the effects of genre-specific and mainstream Billboard chart popularity on RIAA gold or platinum certification of #1 R&B/Hip-Hop singles in the Pre-SoundScan (1977–1992) and SoundScan (1993–2008) eras. The first aim was to determine if there were any statistically significant differences in genre-specific and mainstream popularity between singles that achieved RIAA gold or platinum certification and those that did not reach that pinnacle in both eras. The second aim assessed the relative predictive power of genre-specific and mainstream popularity on RIAA gold or platinum certification of #1 R&B/Hip-Hop singles in the Pre-SoundScan and SoundScan eras while controlling for established brand.

Methods

In this comparative assessment of the relationships between Billboard chart data and RIAA gold/platinum certification data in the Pre-SoundScan and SoundScan eras, genre-specific popularity was measured by total weeks at #1 on Billboard's R&B/Hip-Hop charts and total weeks on the charts regardless of position. Mainstream popularity was evaluated with peak position on Billboard's Pop charts. The established brand construct was assessed with the artist's total prior #1 R&B/Hip-Hop singles and total prior #1s by the record label.

Results

A Mann–Whitney U test revealed statistically significant differences in mainstream popularity between gold or platinum singles and non-gold or platinum singles in both the Pre-SoundScan and SoundScan eras. Statistically significant differences in genre-specific popularity were also observed in both periods, but not in the hypothesized direction in the SoundScan era. A binary logistic regression model demonstrated that the two popularity constructs, while controlling for established brand, predicted RIAA gold or platinum certification of #1 R&B/Hip-Hop singles in both the Pre-SoundScan and SoundScan eras. The model better predicted gold or platinum certification in the Pre-SoundScan era. The most powerful predictor was mainstream popularity in both eras.

Conclusion

Gold or platinum certified #1 R&B/Hip-Hop singles had a significantly higher peak position on the mainstream Pop charts than those not certified gold or platinum in both the Pre-SoundScan and SoundScan eras. When observing genre-specific popularity, gold or platinum singles spent significantly more total weeks on the R&B/Hip-Hop charts than non-gold or platinum singles in the Pre-SoundScan era. In contrast, the reverse was observed in the SoundScan era. Mainstream popularity, as measured by peak position on the Pop charts, and genre-specific popularity, as measured by total weeks on the R&B/Hip-Hop charts, were good predictors of gold or platinum certification in both the Pre-SoundScan and SoundScan eras. The model was a better predictor of RIAA gold or platinum certification in the Pre-SoundScan era, suggesting that the Billboard chart methodology in the earlier era was more aligned with the RIAA auditing process than the SoundScan era methodology. Findings also raise questions about whether the initial exclusion of several African American independent retailers, who were generally the primary source for sales data in the Pre-SoundScan era, reduced the validity of SoundScan sales data. In other words, did the SoundScan data measure what it intended to measure, which was the popularity of R&B/Hip-Hop singles among the target audience of that genre? Future research should examine how the transition to SoundScan may have contributed to redefining the target audience for R&B/Hip-Hop music, impacted the quantity and quality of R&B/Hip-Hop music available to the public, and the effects of those outcomes on the broader culture and society.

Areas of Interest

Recording industry, organizations, stratification, race and ethnic relations, medical sociology, political sociology, quantitative and qualitative methods.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
从榜单冠军到金唱片:1977-2008年,公告牌榜单受欢迎程度对美国唱片业协会(RIAA)对1977-2008年音效扫描前和音效扫描时期排名第一的R&B/Hip-Hop单曲的金唱片或白金唱片认证的影响
引言本文旨在研究《公告牌》(Billboard)榜单的特定流派和主流流行度对美国唱片业协会(RIAA)金唱片或白金唱片认证的影响,包括前声音扫描(Pre-SoundScan)时代(1977-1992 年)和声音扫描(SoundScan)时代(1993-2008 年)排名第一的 R&B/Hip-Hop 单曲。第一个目的是确定在这两个时代中,获得 RIAA 黄金或白金认证的单曲与未达到这一巅峰的单曲在特定流派和主流流行度方面是否存在统计学上的显著差异。第二个目的是在控制既定品牌的情况下,评估特定流派和主流流行度对 Pre-SoundScan 和 SoundScan 时代排名第一的 R&B/Hip-Hop 单曲的 RIAA 金奖或白金奖认证的相对预测能力。方法在对 Billboard 图表数据与 Pre-SoundScan 和 SoundScan 时代 RIAA 金奖/白金奖认证数据之间的关系进行比较评估时,特定流派流行度是通过在 Billboard R&B/Hip-Hop 图表上排名第一的总周数来衡量的,而不考虑排名。主流流行度则根据其在公告牌流行音乐排行榜上的最高排名进行评估。结果Mann-Whitney U 检验显示,在前 SoundScan 时代和 SoundScan 时代,黄金或白金单曲与非黄金或白金单曲在主流流行度方面存在显著的统计学差异。在这两个时期,特定流派流行度的统计差异也非常明显,但在 SoundScan 时代,这种差异没有朝着假设的方向发展。二元逻辑回归模型表明,在控制既定品牌的情况下,这两种流行度结构在前 SoundScan 时代和 SoundScan 时代都能预测 RIAA 对排名第一的 R&B/Hip-Hop 单曲的金唱片或白金唱片认证。该模型能更好地预测前 SoundScan 时代的金唱片或白金唱片认证。结论在前 SoundScan 时代和 SoundScan 时代,获得金唱片或白金唱片认证的 R&B/Hip-Hop 第一单曲在主流流行音乐排行榜上的峰值位置明显高于未获得金唱片或白金唱片认证的单曲。在观察特定流派的受欢迎程度时,金唱片或白金唱片在R&B/Hip-Hop排行榜上的总周数远多于在前声音扫描时代未获得金唱片或白金唱片认证的单曲。相反,在 SoundScan 时代则出现了相反的情况。以流行音乐排行榜上的最高位置衡量的主流流行度,以及以 R&B/Hip-Hop 排行榜上的总周数来衡量的特定流派流行度,在前声音扫描时代和声音扫描时代都能很好地预测金唱片或白金唱片的认证。在前 SoundScan 时代,该模型对 RIAA 金奖或白金奖认证的预测效果更好,这表明与 SoundScan 时代的方法相比,早期的 Billboard 图表方法更符合 RIAA 的审核流程。研究结果还提出了一些问题,即在前 SoundScan 时代,一些非裔美国人独立零售商通常是销售数据的主要来源,最初将他们排除在外是否降低了 SoundScan 销售数据的有效性。换句话说,SoundScan 数据是否衡量了它想要衡量的东西,即 R&B/Hip-Hop 单曲在该流派目标受众中的受欢迎程度?未来的研究应探讨向SoundScan的过渡如何重新定义了R&B/Hip-Hop音乐的目标受众,如何影响了公众可获得的R&B/Hip-Hop音乐的数量和质量,以及这些结果对更广泛的文化和社会的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Poetics
Poetics Multiple-
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
16.00%
发文量
77
期刊介绍: Poetics is an interdisciplinary journal of theoretical and empirical research on culture, the media and the arts. Particularly welcome are papers that make an original contribution to the major disciplines - sociology, psychology, media and communication studies, and economics - within which promising lines of research on culture, media and the arts have been developed.
期刊最新文献
Age and cultural differences in the relationship between reading and theory of mind Who are social critics: The effects of directors’ status and reputation on the choice of social problem films in the Korean film industry Editorial Board The problem of socio-territorial inequality in cultural policies: Unveiling policy frames through Barcelona policies (2019–2023) The curious transformation of “Critical Race Theory” to “CRT”: The role of election campaigns in American culture wars
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1